Technical Review by
Laura Iannini
Privileged access is the highest-value target in your environment. Every credential with elevated rights is an entry point, and attackers know it. Standing access, weak rotation practices, and shared admin accounts are not edge cases; they are the conditions that turn a phishing email into a full network compromise.
We evaluated eight privileged access management platforms for session control depth, credential vaulting, just-in-time access, compliance reporting, and whether the deployment reality matches the marketing. What we found: the gap between “PAM platform” and “PAM that your team will actually run” is significant. Some platforms deliver enterprise-grade session analytics but require months of cross-departmental coordination before they protect anything. Others deploy fast and cover most environments well, but fall short when compliance auditors need granular evidence.
This guide cuts through the feature lists to show you which platforms deliver when a privileged account is compromised, and which ones reward the deployment investment with controls that hold up at scale.
Privileged access management (PAM) controls the most powerful accounts in your organization: admin credentials, root accounts, service accounts, and API keys that give users elevated access to critical systems. PAM platforms store these credentials in encrypted vaults, enforce approval workflows before granting access, record what users do during privileged sessions, and automatically rotate passwords after use. The goal is ensuring that privileged access is granted only when needed, monitored while active, and revoked when complete.
PAM platforms operate across four layers: credential vaulting (storing privileged credentials in encrypted, access-controlled vaults with automated rotation), session management (brokering, recording, and monitoring privileged sessions with keystroke capture and real-time termination), just-in-time access (granting time-bound elevated privileges through approval workflows that eliminate standing access), and threat detection (behavioral analytics and machine learning to detect anomalous privileged activity). BeyondTrust covers PAM, endpoint privilege control, and remote access in a broad suite. Organizations evaluating alternatives typically seek simpler deployment, more competitive pricing, or stronger capabilities in a specific sub-category such as credential vaulting, session analytics, or endpoint privilege elevation.
Here is a comparison of the top BeyondTrust alternatives across key privileged access capabilities.
| Product | Best For | Credential Vault | Session Recording | JIT Access | Endpoint Privilege |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Keeper Security
|
Cloud PAM with zero-knowledge encryption
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
|
ARCON PAM
|
Large regulated enterprises in banking/finance
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
CyberArk PAM
|
Enterprise benchmark for hybrid PAM
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Delinea Secret Server
|
Fine-grained in-session authorization
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
JumpCloud
|
Unified identity, PAM, and device management
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Okta Privileged Access
|
Okta shops consolidating IAM and PAM
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
One Identity Safeguard
|
Session recording and behavioral analytics
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Segura
|
SMBs needing fast deployment and usable PAM
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
We evaluated eight privileged access management platforms for session control depth, credential vaulting, just-in-time access, compliance reporting, and deployment complexity. Each platform was assessed for how effectively it replaces or improves upon BeyondTrust’s capabilities across PAM, endpoint privilege control, and remote access. We reviewed customer feedback from regulated industries, enterprise IT, and mid-market deployments to understand where these platforms deliver real value and where complexity becomes the enemy of security. This article was researched and written by Mirren McDade, with technical review by Laura Iannini. Read our full methodology
Keeper Security is a cloud-native PAM platform built on an enterprise password manager that many security teams already use. KeeperPAM, launched in February 2025, adds privileged session management, browser isolation, and automated credential rotation without on-premises appliances. We think it’s a strong BeyondTrust alternative for mid-sized to large organizations that want PAM without legacy deployment complexity.
We were impressed by how quickly KeeperPAM deploys compared to traditional PAM platforms. In our testing, the whole setup process was smooth and took place in the web app with no client installation required. The remote browser isolation is a strong differentiator; browsing sessions run in a virtualized Chromium instance that streams through the vault, eliminating credential theft risk. Keeper supports 70,000 business customers and has never suffered a breach. KeeperPAM is $85 per user per month, which includes Secrets Manager and Connection Manager. With that said, advanced reporting and dark web monitoring are separate paid add-ons. If you want PAM with session recording, browser isolation, and zero-knowledge security without on-premises infrastructure, Keeper is well worth considering.
Best for Large regulated enterprises where audit compliance drives the PAM decision
ARCON PAM manages the full lifecycle of privileged accounts, from credential vaulting to session tracking. We think it’s best suited for large regulated enterprises, particularly in banking and financial services, where audit compliance and standing access risk are primary concerns.
The banking sector is where ARCON PAM shows up most consistently. Large enterprise customers managing thousands of privileged accounts say the centralized control framework and audit reporting deliver real operational value. According to customer feedback, technical support resolutions run slow on complex issues, and initial setup requires significant time investment in large environments.
We think ARCON PAM fits large regulated enterprises where audit compliance and standing access risk are primary concerns. If your environment runs thousands of privileged accounts across regulated infrastructure, the centralized framework handles that scale. If you need fast support turnaround or a quick deployment, validate those expectations upfront with the vendor.
Best for Large enterprises with hybrid infrastructure and zero tolerance for credential risk
CyberArk PAM is the enterprise standard for privileged access management, built for organizations with complex hybrid infrastructure and zero tolerance for credential risk. CyberArk was acquired by Palo Alto Networks in February 2026 for approximately $25 billion, positioning CyberArk’s PAM capabilities as a core identity security pillar within Palo Alto’s broader security platform. We found the automated response loop, where suspicious sessions are terminated and credentials rotated without manual intervention, sets CyberArk apart from platforms that alert without acting.
Customers consistently call CyberArk the gold standard in PAM, and audit readiness is where that reputation holds up. The vault, session recording, and compliance reporting combination delivers real value at enterprise scale. Based on customer reviews, password rotation reliability drops in non-standard configurations, and check-in/check-out functionality can be unreliable, requiring admins to unlock accounts manually.
We think CyberArk fits large enterprises that can dedicate the resources to deploy and maintain it. If audit compliance and hybrid infrastructure are your primary drivers, this is built for that environment. If your team is smaller or needs rapid deployment, the operational overhead is real. Go in with your deployment plan and dedicated technical resources in place.
Best for Enterprises that prioritize authorization depth over rapid deployment
Delinea Secret Server is a PAM platform that focuses on what happens after users authenticate, giving organizations precise control over what privileged accounts can actually do. We think this distinction matters: most PAM platforms focus on getting users in securely, but Secret Server’s fine-grained access policies set clear limits on user actions within privileged sessions, reinforcing least privilege without relying on blanket restrictions.
Ease of administration stands out in customer feedback. Users say managing access and auditing privileged accounts from a single console simplifies daily operations considerably. Security teams consistently credit the detailed audit visibility as a key operational advantage. Some users report that automated password rotation failures triggered account lockouts in certain configurations.
We think Delinea Secret Server fits enterprises that prioritize authorization depth over rapid deployment. If your security model requires precise control over what privileged users can do inside sessions, not just who gets in, this platform addresses that directly. If your team needs a fast implementation or simple credential storage, factor the setup complexity into your evaluation.
Best for Growing organizations consolidating identity and access tools
JumpCloud is an all-in-one identity and access platform that handles MFA, SSO, PAM, and device management from a single console. We think it’s a strong alternative to BeyondTrust for growing organizations that want to consolidate identity and access tools without enterprise-grade PAM complexity.
We think JumpCloud fits growing organizations that want to consolidate identity and access tools without enterprise-grade PAM complexity. The unified console is a real advantage if you’re managing identity, MFA, and device policies across a mixed-OS fleet. JumpCloud offers a 10-day free trial with full premium access, and a la carte pricing starts at $2 per user per month on annual billing. Set bundles start at $13 per user per month for the Core Directory package. With that said, the platform can conflict with macOS, and bundled pricing can feel expensive for teams needing only a single capability. If you want PAM alongside identity and device management in one platform, JumpCloud is well worth considering.
Best for Organizations already running Okta wanting to eliminate separate PAM tooling
Okta Privileged Access eliminates standing credentials and unifies privileged access with IAM and IGA controls, all within the Okta Workforce Identity Cloud. We think the strongest case for this product is consolidation: if your organization already runs Okta for identity, extending into Privileged Access avoids introducing another vendor and another management console. Okta recently acquired Axiom Security to expand privileged access controls to more resources.
Customer feedback specific to Okta Privileged Access is limited. Available reviews speak to the broader Okta platform, with users praising SSO reliability, timely service updates, and the depth of available integrations. Feedback on PAM-specific capabilities like session recording, secrets vaulting, and non-human identity management is sparse in current customer data.
We think Okta Privileged Access is the strongest option for organizations already running Okta for identity. If your team wants to consolidate IAM, IGA, and PAM, this eliminates the overhead of running three separate tools. If your environment runs on a different identity platform, evaluate the integration scope first. The value grows significantly for organizations deeper in the Okta ecosystem.
Best for Large enterprises needing session recording and behavioral analytics
One Identity Safeguard is a Privileged Access Management (PAM) suite offering modules for password management, session monitoring, and threat detection. The platform enables organizations to secure, control, and audit access to critical resources throughout the session. Safeguard is part of the One Identity suite, which covers identity governance, access management, privileged access, and Active Directory management through the One Identity Fabric.
We think One Identity Safeguard is a strong alternative for large enterprises needing powerful tools to control and monitor privileged access across multiple platforms with minimal user friction. We liked the session recording and analysis capabilities in particular. For SMBs, One Identity PAM Essentials is also available as a SaaS-based solution that delivers streamlined, cost-effective protection without heavy infrastructure.
Best for SMBs and mid-market teams needing fast deployment and usable PAM
Segura (formerly senhasegura) is a PAM platform built for fast deployment and ease of use, covering both human and machine identities. We think it’s a strong option for SMBs and mid-market organizations that need strong privileged access controls without the complexity of larger enterprise PAM deployments.
The feedback is unusually consistent. Users across multiple industries praise the interface as one of the most intuitive in the PAM category, and administrators say onboarding credentials and managing access runs faster than comparable platforms. Vendor responsiveness earns consistent credit, with customers describing fast resolutions and an attentive support relationship. No significant criticisms surfaced in the available customer data.
We think Segura suits SMBs and mid-market teams that need a deployable, usable PAM platform without heavy infrastructure investment. If your team needs to cover both human and machine identities across a mixed environment, the versatility is there. If your organization requires deep enterprise-grade session analytics or has unusually complex legacy infrastructure, validate the fit before committing. For organizations that value usability and deployment speed, Segura punches above its weight.
During our research for this guide, we evaluated numerous PAM solutions. The following tools are also worth considering:
A scalable PAM solution with cloud-based LDAP, RADIUS, and SSH key management.
Password randomization and encryption, one-time access, and credential rotation to protect shared accounts.
Password management and PEDM to secure privileged access for both internal and remote users.
PAM pricing varies significantly by platform, deployment model, and scope. Most enterprise PAM solutions are quote-based. The table below reflects publicly available starting prices where possible.
| Product | Starting Price | Billing | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Keeper Security
|
$85/user/mo (plus base license)
|
Annual
|
|
|
ARCON PAM
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
CyberArk PAM
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
Delinea Secret Server
|
Contact for quote (per privileged account)
|
Annual
|
|
|
JumpCloud
|
From $2/user/mo (a la carte)
|
Monthly or Annual
|
|
|
Okta Privileged Access
|
$1,500 annual minimum (Okta platform)
|
Annual
|
|
|
One Identity Safeguard
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
Segura
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
These are the evaluation steps we recommend when selecting a BeyondTrust alternative for privileged access management.
BeyondTrust covers PAM, endpoint privilege control, and remote access; most alternatives excel in one or two of these areas rather than all three, so clarify your priorities before evaluating.
Manual credential management is the gap most breaches exploit; centralizing credentials in an encrypted vault with policy-driven rotation eliminates static passwords that attackers reuse.
Auditors need proof of who accessed what, when, and why; tamper-proof recordings with searchable replay and keystroke capture are non-negotiable for regulated environments.
Standing privileges are standing risk; time-bound, approval-based access that expires automatically limits the blast radius when credentials are compromised.
Enterprise PAM platforms can take months to deploy; if your team is lean, prioritize platforms with fast deployment models that protect accounts before the next audit cycle.
Third-party access is a primary attack vector; evaluate how each platform controls, monitors, and time-limits external privileged sessions.
Base licensing may look affordable, but session recording, advanced reporting, and secrets management are often sold as separate modules that increase per-user costs significantly.
When a privileged account is compromised, support responsiveness matters; check third-party reviews for consistency because support quality varies significantly across PAM vendors.
No single BeyondTrust alternative fits every organization. Your choice depends on your infrastructure complexity, compliance requirements, and team capacity.
If you need the enterprise benchmark for privileged access security, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager delivers automated session termination and credential rotation. Plan for significant implementation effort.
For mid-sized teams that want PAM without legacy deployment complexity, KeeperPAM builds directly on an existing Keeper vault with session recording, browser isolation, and zero-knowledge security.
If your organization wants to consolidate IAM and PAM under one vendor, Okta Privileged Access eliminates separate tooling for organizations already in the Okta ecosystem.
For large regulated enterprises where audit compliance drives the decision, ARCON PAM and Delinea Secret Server both deliver deep session analytics and JIT access. ARCON excels in banking and financial services; Delinea excels in fine-grained in-session authorization.
For SMBs and mid-market teams that need fast deployment and usable PAM, Segura delivers strong privileged access controls without enterprise complexity.
Read the individual reviews above to understand credential vaulting depth, session monitoring capabilities, and the deployment trade-offs that matter for your environment.
“Privileged access” describes the elevated permissions granted to user accounts—typically by IT or security administrators—that provide administrative-level access to critical systems and applications.
Many organizations classify their systems into tiers based on the potential impact of a breach or misuse—the higher the tier, the greater the potential damage. Privileged accounts, such as domain admin or local administrator accounts, are assigned higher permissions than standard user accounts, giving them administrative access to high-tier systems.
If a cybercriminal were to compromise a privileged account by stealing or cracking its credentials, they could:
“Standing privileges” are elevated access rights that remain active at all times. When a user has standing privileges, those permissions are always assigned to their account, even if they aren’t actively using them. In some cases, users may not even realize they have these privileges.
A common example is the default “admin” account that comes pre-configured on a new laptop or desktop, or when a new cloud application is installed.
The Problem: If an attacker compromises a privileged account by stealing or hacking login credentials, they can repeatedly use that account to access critical business resources.
The Solution: The most effective way to reduce risk from standing privileges is to implement a “Just-In-Time” (JIT) approach to elevated access, also known as the “principle of least privilege.”
This principle recommends that IT, security, and compliance teams grant elevated permissions only when necessary and only for the duration required. Once the user logs out, the elevated permissions are revoked. In other words, users always have just enough access to perform their job functions.
With just-in-time privileges, if an attacker compromises an account, they can only use the elevated permissions once—significantly limiting the potential damage.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) is the practice of identifying privileged users and ensuring they are granted only the appropriate level of access, while removing any unnecessary permissions.
By limiting access and controlling the duration for which credentials are valid, PAM reduces the window of opportunity for cybercriminals to compromise privileged accounts.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) software allows IT and security teams to assign, monitor, and protect privileged access to high-tier business systems and applications. This typically involves:
PAM tools generally operate in one of two ways:
The most advanced PAM tools also let administrators monitor a user’s actions during a privileged session. This helps detect malicious behavior and supports regulatory compliance and auditing. Monitoring capabilities vary by solution, ranging from activity logs to full video recordings and keystroke tracking.
Implementing a PAM solution offers several advantages:
Identity and Access Management (IAM) and privileged access management (also called privileged identity management) are related but distinct concepts.
IAM consists of tools and processes—such as multi-factor authentication and single sign-on—that verify and authorize users across the entire organization. This allows IT and security teams to control who can access which resources, from where, when, and under what conditions. In IAM, verification typically happens when a user signs into their account, using credentials and additional authentication factors to confirm identity.
PAM is a specialized branch of IAM that focuses exclusively on privileged users who need to access sensitive resources. With PAM, verification occurs when a user attempts to access a specific system or application. While MFA is often part of PAM, the solution ultimately validates access based on attributes rather than just credentials.
In short: IAM ensures that users can log in, while PAM ensures they only have the precise level of access they need.
Further reading on identity and access management from Expert Insights — buyers' guides, comparison articles, and platform-specific shortlists.
Mirren McDade is a senior writer and journalist at Expert Insights, spending each day researching, writing, editing and publishing content, covering a variety of topics and solutions, and interviewing industry experts.
She is an experienced copywriter with a background in a range of industries, including cloud business technologies, cloud security, information security and cyber security, and has conducted interviews with several industry experts.
Mirren holds a First Class Honors degree in English from Edinburgh Napier University.
Laura Iannini is a Cybersecurity Analyst at Expert Insights. With deep cybersecurity knowledge and strong research skills, she leads Expert Insights’ product testing team, conducting thorough tests of product features and in-depth industry analysis to ensure that Expert Insights’ product reviews are definitive and insightful.
Laura also carries out wider analysis of vendor landscapes and industry trends to inform Expert Insights’ enterprise cybersecurity buyers’ guides, covering topics such as security awareness training, cloud backup and recovery, email security, and network monitoring. Prior to working at Expert Insights, Laura worked as a Senior Information Security Engineer at Constant Edge, where she tested cybersecurity solutions, carried out product demos, and provided high-quality ongoing technical support.
Laura holds a Bachelor’s degree in Cybersecurity from the University of West Florida.