Laura Iannini is a Cybersecurity Analyst at Expert Insights. With deep cybersecurity knowledge and strong research skills, she leads Expert Insights’ product testing team, conducting thorough tests of product features and in-depth industry analysis to ensure that Expert Insights’ product reviews are definitive and insightful.
Laura also carries out wider analysis of vendor landscapes and industry trends to inform Expert Insights’ enterprise cybersecurity buyers’ guides, covering topics such as security awareness training, cloud backup and recovery, email security, and network monitoring. Prior to working at Expert Insights, Laura worked as a Senior Information Security Engineer at Constant Edge, where she tested cybersecurity solutions, carried out product demos, and provided high-quality ongoing technical support.
Laura holds a Bachelor’s degree in Cybersecurity from the University of West Florida.
We reviewed the leading API security testing tools on the depth of endpoint discovery, how accurately each identifies OWASP API Top 10 vulnerabilities, and the developer-facing output that determines whether findings get fixed or ignored.
We reviewed 8 ISPM platforms on the depth of identity risk discovery, how accurately each identifies misconfigured permissions and risky access paths, and the integration quality with the IAM and directory tools security teams already use.
We reviewed 8 secure file-sharing and storage services on how well each enforces security policies when files are shared externally, the granularity of access controls, and the compliance certifications that matter for regulated industries.
We reviewed 5 privacy-focused email and productivity suites on encryption architecture, data residency options, and how well each supports the compliance obligations of organizations that cannot accept standard cloud data processing terms.
We reviewed 10 secure document-editing platforms on how well each maintains security controls throughout the collaboration lifecycle, from initial creation through external sharing and final archiving.
We reviewed 11 secure collaboration tools on encryption depth, how well DLP policies hold up during real collaboration workflows, and whether admin controls give security teams the visibility and enforcement they need at organizational scale.
We reviewed 10 cloud collaboration platforms on the granularity of admin controls, how well each enforces security policy for external collaboration, and the encryption architecture that determines what happens to your data if the vendor is compromised.
We reviewed 11 human risk management platforms on the sophistication of individual risk scoring, how well training is adapted based on measured behavior, and the reporting that gives security teams evidence of real risk reduction over time.
We reviewed 10 cybersecurity intelligence and telemetry feeds on threat coverage breadth, update frequency, and how well each integrates with SIEM and SOAR platforms to drive automated response.
We reviewed 8 cybersecurity professional services providers on the range of disciplines covered, engagement model flexibility, and the evidence of real-world outcomes. Here's what we think is worth considering.
We reviewed 8 customizable cybersecurity service providers on engagement model range, technical depth at each tier, and the evidence of genuine flexibility when client requirements change.
We reviewed the leading managed cybersecurity service providers on the breadth of protection they deliver, analyst quality, and the compliance support that matters for organizations in regulated industries.
We reviewed 9 platforms against CMMC 2.0 requirements across Levels 1, 2, and 3. Here's what we found for defense contractors working toward certification.
We reviewed the leading AI compliance platforms on how well they map to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and emerging sector-specific requirements, and whether the governance workflows they provide are operational or just documentation.
We reviewed 10 compliance training platforms on content library depth, completion tracking, and how well they map to specific regulatory frameworks. Engagement quality varied considerably.
We reviewed the leading secure data management platforms on classification accuracy, policy enforcement depth, and how well they support audit and compliance workflows across enterprise data environments.
We reviewed the leading business continuity and alerting solutions on how quickly they surface disruption events, the reliability of alert delivery across communication channels, and how well each integrates with incident response workflows.
We reviewed the leading EUC risk management tools on the accuracy of end-user computing asset discovery, the depth of version and change controls, and how well each supports the audit evidence that regulators require.
We reviewed the leading compliance tracking solutions on framework breadth, control mapping quality, and how well each surfaces gaps before they become findings during an audit.
Our list of the top alternatives to NinjaOne for RMM, MDM, UEM, device control, and patch management. We looked at each platform based on its ability to address the same use cases as NinjaOne, as well as testing its performance, ease of use, and scalability.
We reviewed the leading Rippling IT alternatives on core IT management capabilities, how well they handle device lifecycle management independently of HR workflows, and the pricing models available at different scales.
We reviewed the top BeyondTrust alternatives on privileged access management, endpoint privilege control, and vendor support quality. Here's what we think is worth a serious look.
We reviewed 9 Microsoft Entra ID alternatives on identity lifecycle management, SSO and MFA capabilities, and how well each supports environments that extend beyond Microsoft's ecosystem. Some offer capabilities Entra ID does not.
We compared the leading Datto RMM alternatives on automation breadth, security monitoring integration, and pricing at different client volume levels. Here's what we think is worth trialing before you commit to a switch.
by Caitlin Harris
We compared the leading Atera RMM alternatives on automation capabilities, monitoring depth, and how the pricing models compare for practices managing different volumes of endpoints and clients.
by Mirren McDade
We reviewed 8 Entra ID backup solutions on granular object recovery, retention depth, and security controls. Native Microsoft tooling does not cover what these platforms protect.
We reviewed 9 Azure VM backup solutions on recovery granularity, backup policy depth, and how well each handles cross-region recovery scenarios when Azure infrastructure itself is affected.
Discover the best patch management solutions for Windows devices. Explore features such as update scanning, automated patch deployment, and reporting.
We reviewed the leading macOS MDM solutions on Apple Business Manager integration, application lifecycle management, and the device health reporting that tells IT teams about problems before users notice them.
We reviewed 9 Windows MDM platforms on Intune compatibility, security configuration depth, and the remote troubleshooting capabilities that reduce how often technicians need physical device access.
We reviewed 9 Proofpoint email security alternatives on detection accuracy, the quality of threat intelligence, and how well each integrates into Microsoft 365 environments where most organizations have now consolidated their productivity infrastructure.
We reviewed 7 IT asset management solutions on discovery accuracy, the depth of software license tracking, and how well each connects asset data to the security and compliance workflows that depend on knowing exactly what is in your environment.