Craig MacAlpine is CEO and Founder of Expert Insights. Before founding Expert Insights in August 2018, Craig spent 10 years as CEO of EPA Cloud, an email security provider that rebranded as VIPRE Email Security following its acquisition by Ziff Davis, formerly J2Global (NASDAQ: ZD) in 2013.
Craig is a passionate security innovator with over 20 years of experience helping organizations to stay secure with cutting-edge information security and cybersecurity solutions.
Using his extensive experience in the email security industry, he founded Expert Insights with the singular goal of helping IT professionals and CISOs to cut through the noise and find the right cybersecurity solutions they need to protect their organizations.
We reviewed the leading Salesforce backup platforms on granularity of object-level recovery, backup frequency, and how they handle metadata alongside standard CRM records.
The best all-in-one RMM and PSA software for MSPs, compared by Expert Insights.
We reviewed the leading CyberArk alternatives on privileged access controls, session monitoring depth, and implementation overhead. Some are simpler; some are comparably capable at lower cost.
We reviewed the leading SharePoint Online backup solutions on site, library, and item-level recovery granularity, how well each handles versioned content, and the restoration speed that determines how long SharePoint is unavailable after a loss event.
We reviewed the leading server backup platforms on backup window efficiency, restoration speed under realistic conditions, and encryption depth. Here's what we think is worth running in production.
We reviewed DMARC platforms built for MSP deployments on tenant management depth, white-label reporting quality, and the automation that reduces the manual effort of moving client domains toward full enforcement.
We reviewed the leading DevSecOps tools on how well they integrate into CI/CD pipelines, the depth of automated security checks at each pipeline stage, and whether developer-facing output drives faster fixes or just longer review queues.
We reviewed the leading endpoint backup solutions on backup automation, the speed and granularity of recovery, and how well each manages protection across organizations with endpoints in multiple locations.
We compared the leading Veeam alternatives for M365 backup on workload coverage, restore granularity, and total cost of ownership. Some deliver comparable capability at lower complexity; others offer features Veeam does not.
We reviewed 12 Secure Web Gateway platforms on filtering accuracy, HTTPS inspection depth, and the application controls that prevent employees from moving data to unauthorized destinations.
We reviewed the leading Dynamics 365 backup solutions on the breadth of data covered, recovery granularity, and how well each handles the complex entity relationships in Dynamics environments that make selective restoration challenging.
We reviewed leading VM backup platforms on backup frequency, deduplication efficiency, and recovery speed under realistic conditions. Here's what the testing showed.
We reviewed the leading DR software solutions on replication performance, the accuracy of automated recovery testing, and how well each surfaces gaps between documented recovery objectives and actual recovery capability.
We reviewed the leading Active Directory recovery tools on the granularity of object-level restoration, how quickly each can perform a full forest recovery, and whether the backup architecture protects against the ransomware attacks that most commonly take AD offline.
We reviewed the leading Google Workspace backup solutions on recovery granularity, eDiscovery depth, and how they handle retention policy enforcement. The differences matter when you need to restore.
We reviewed leading SaaS backup platforms on the breadth of application coverage, recovery granularity, and how well they handle point-in-time restoration. The gaps in coverage were eye-opening.
We reviewed 11 cloud orchestration platforms on workflow flexibility, integration breadth, and how much manual effort they actually eliminate. The gap between the most and least capable was significant.
We reviewed 10 CIAM platforms on authentication option depth, how well each handles consent management at scale, and the developer experience that determines how quickly customer identity can be integrated into your applications.
We reviewed the leading Azure Active Directory alternatives on directory service depth, federation support, and how well each handles the hybrid environments where on-premises and cloud identity management must coexist.
We reviewed 11 remote desktop platforms on connection performance, session recording, and the collaboration features that make remote support faster. Reliability under real-world network conditions separated the field.
We reviewed on-premises endpoint security platforms on detection accuracy, management console depth, and how they perform without cloud connectivity. Here's what we found for organizations that need full local control.
We reviewed the leading ZTNA platforms on identity-aware access enforcement, the granularity of application segmentation, and how well each handles policy enforcement for unmanaged devices accessing corporate resources.
We reviewed the leading M365 email archiving solutions on how well they extend native retention capabilities, the speed and granularity of eDiscovery search, and the compliance reporting that audit teams need beyond what Microsoft provides.
We compared the leading Kaspersky alternatives on protection depth, management console quality, and the migration support that determines how disruptive the transition will be. Here's what we found.
by Joel Witts
We compared 10 Mimecast alternatives on threat detection accuracy, Microsoft 365 integration, and total cost of ownership. Here's what we think is worth your time to evaluate.
We reviewed the leading browser isolation platforms on the fidelity of the isolation environment, how well DLP policies hold up for downloads and uploads, and the performance trade-offs that determine whether employees will actually use the solution.
We reviewed the leading XDR platforms on the breadth of data sources they ingest, the quality of cross-layer correlation, and how well automated response handles threats that span endpoint, identity, and network.
We reviewed the leading threat detection and response platforms on detection logic depth, automated response capabilities, and how well each supports analyst-led investigation when automated response is not appropriate.
by Craig MacAlpine
We reviewed the leading anti-impersonation and spoofing solutions on DMARC enforcement depth, display name spoofing detection, and how well each identifies the lookalike domains that attackers use to conduct convincing phishing campaigns.
We reviewed the leading KnowBe4 alternatives on training content freshness, the sophistication of phishing simulation templates, and the behavioral reporting that shows whether training is translating into lower click rates.
We reviewed the leading secret management platforms on vault architecture, secrets rotation automation, and how well they integrate with CI/CD pipelines where credentials are most often exposed.
We reviewed the leading IGA platforms on access certification workflow accuracy, the depth of lifecycle management automation, and how well each enforces least privilege across the identity environment.