Technical Review by
Laura Iannini
Our list of the top SOAR solutions, assessing features like automated workflows, threat intelligence integration, and no-code playbooks. We evaluated each platform for scalability, usability, and effectiveness to help SOC teams streamline incident response.
Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) tools help organizations coordinate and automate their event analysis and incident response processes.
The Challenge: Between an IT skills shortage, an overwhelming number of IT and security solutions to manage, and an increasing attack surface, IT and security teams have a lot of plates to juggle. Unfortunately, it can be easy to let one slip.
SOAR tools alleviate some of this pressure by automating and aligning already-established processes for threat detection and automating repetitive response processes for common security challenges.
How SOAR Works: A SOAR tool aggregates security and event data from across the network. It then analyzes that data using machine learning to identify cyberthreats, notifying your SOC team of any high-risk activity it discovers via triaged, prioritized alerts.
Most SOAR tools offer two remediation options: they can guide your SOC team through remediation workflows, or automatically remediate more simple threats using response playbooks configured by the SOC team.
In this article, we’ll highlight:
We handpicked these SOAR solutions by evaluating their ability to streamline threat detection and response, focusing on automation, integration, and usability. We conducted hands-on testing and analyzed user feedback from online sources, ensuring they suit businesses from startups to enterprises. Here are the five key features we examined:
With these features in focus, we’ve selected the top Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response solutions for 2026 to empower your SOC and combat cyber threats effectively. Let’s dive in!
Cyware SOAR targets enterprise security teams that need to automate threat response at scale. It connects detection, investigation, and response across your security stack from one platform. The platform is particularly strong for phishing analysis, malware management, and incident response.
The platform ships with over 100 pre-built playbook templates and a drag-and-drop builder for custom automation. We found the 300+ App Marketplace integrations particularly useful for teams running mixed-vendor environments where manual handoffs slow everything down.
Automated case and threat management run from a single interface. A lightweight agent covers both cloud and on-premises deployments, so your team keeps the same workflows regardless of where workloads sit.
Customers say the no-code automation approach lowers the barrier for building workflows without writing custom scripts. Users have flagged the MITRE ATT&CK framework alignment as a practical benefit for teams that want structure around their detection and response logic.
Some available customer feedback covers related Cyware products rather than SOAR directly. Where it overlaps, customers highlight support for custom integrations in multiple programming languages when native options fall short.
We think Cyware SOAR suits organizations with established SOC processes and the headcount to build and maintain playbooks over time. If your team handles high alert volumes across phishing, malware, vulnerability management, and threat hunting, the platform covers those workflows well.
Leaner teams or early-stage security programs get less value from the platform’s depth without dedicated SOC resources. For mature enterprise operations, we think the investment pays off.
Devo SOAR is an intelligence-driven platform built for enterprise SOC teams looking to automate the full threat management lifecycle. The differentiator is HyperStream, its real-time analytics engine, which handles large data volumes without the performance degradation common in high-volume environments.
Devo SOAR connects with over 300 preconfigured integrations, covering the core of a modern security stack. We found the no-code playbook builder a practical advantage for SOC teams that need to move fast without pulling in engineering resources every time a workflow changes.
Alert triaging and case management run through the same interface, keeping investigation workflows tight. HyperStream drives real-time analytics across high data volumes, which matters when your SOC is handling concurrent incidents at scale.
The available customer feedback covers Devo’s broader platform rather than SOAR specifically. That limits what we can validate on SOAR directly, so treat this section as partial.
Where feedback does cross over, customers say the platform is straightforward to learn. Users have flagged support quality and training resources as areas needing improvement, particularly for teams without prior Devo experience.
We think Devo SOAR works best for enterprise teams running high-volume environments where real-time analytics is a priority. If your SOC is scaling and alert volume is the core operational problem, the HyperStream architecture directly addresses that.
For smaller teams or those without SOC maturity, the platform’s depth requires meaningful investment to unlock. Based on our review, we think Devo is worth evaluating for enterprise-scale operations.
FortiSOAR targets global enterprises and MSSPs that need to orchestrate security operations across complex, multi-tenant environments. The FortiGuard threat intelligence integration gives it a native intelligence layer that standalone SOAR platforms lack.
FortiSOAR ships with over 350 integrations and 3,000 automated workflow actions across 160 customizable playbooks. We found the combination of scale and customization particularly strong for MSSPs managing multiple client environments simultaneously.
The role-based dashboard tracks metrics and performance data across tenants, and mobile app alerts keep your team informed when they’re away from a workstation. Multi-tenant and shared-tenant deployment options give enterprise and MSSP teams real architecture flexibility.
Customers say FortiSOAR delivers measurable improvements to incident response speed, with faster mean time to detect consistently cited. Users have flagged the multi-tenant architecture as a standout for environments requiring cross-platform automation at scale.
Dashboard functionality draws some criticism. Users have flagged that SOC and NOC visibility features need improvement. One customer also noted limited third-party integration coverage, which sits in tension with the platform’s 350+ listed integrations.
We think FortiSOAR makes the most sense for organizations already operating within the Fortinet ecosystem, or MSSPs managing security operations across multiple clients. The FortiGuard intelligence layer and multi-tenant architecture are genuine differentiators in those environments.
If your organization runs a lean, single-tenant SOC, the platform’s depth adds cost without proportional return. Based on our review, we think it is a strong platform for the audience it is built for.
Google Security Operations SOAR runs on Google Cloud infrastructure and serves 960,000 businesses globally. It covers detection, investigation, and response with no-code playbook automation and unified case management, built for MSPs and enterprise teams managing large data volumes.
Case management handles alert ingestion, grouping, prioritization, assignment, and investigation from a single interface. We found the no-code playbook builder particularly strong for teams that need consistent automation without building engineering dependencies into every workflow.
Root cause analysis sits at the center of the investigation workflow, backed by integrated threat intelligence. That focus keeps your analysts on causation, not just working through alert queues.
Customers say the platform delivers fast search and analysis across massive data volumes, with scalability consistently cited as a core strength. Users have flagged that centralized detection and investigation noticeably speeds up incident response.
Cost and support draw the most criticism. Customers say pricing is high and slower support responses create frustration when urgent issues need resolution. Users have also flagged a learning curve for teams new to Google Cloud services.
We think Google Security Operations SOAR works best for organizations already invested in the Google Cloud ecosystem, or MSPs managing large, complex client environments. The platform’s data handling and automation depth reward teams with the maturity to use them.
If your team is still building out its security operations, the pricing and learning curve are factors your leadership needs to weigh carefully. Based on our review, we think this is a strong platform for teams ready to operate at scale.
IBM QRadar SOAR is an enterprise incident response platform for organizations running QRadar SIEM. It centralizes alerts, walks analysts through response workflows with in-app guidance, and integrates tightly with the wider IBM security stack.
The platform ships with pre-packaged playbooks and in-app guidance that speed up analyst decisions during active incidents. We found the artifact extraction feature practical: it pulls IP addresses and URLs from QRadar offenses directly into case files, cutting manual data entry during triage.
The dashboard consolidates alerts with key metrics visible across incident types. Hundreds of integrations are available free through the IBM Security App Exchange, and the incident categorization system lets your team configure response steps specific to each threat type.
Customers say the platform works well as a central hub for incident management, with automation reducing repetitive workload for analysts. Users have flagged the multi-team collaboration features and intuitive dashboard as real operational wins.
Customization draws consistent criticism. Customers say playbook and workflow customization is challenging, and sub-playbook functionality feels limited compared to other platforms. Users have also flagged documentation gaps, support quality issues, and compatibility problems with some external tool integrations.
We think QRadar SOAR makes the most sense if your organization already runs QRadar SIEM. The native integration creates a streamlined workflow from offense detection to resolution that standalone alternatives struggle to replicate.
If you need advanced customization or operate outside the IBM security ecosystem, those limitations add friction. Based on our review, we think it is a strong choice for IBM-native environments that prioritize guided, consistent response over highly custom workflows.
Cortex XSOAR is an enterprise SOAR platform built around a marketplace of 750 tool integrations and 680 content packs. The “war room” feature sets it apart: a collaborative investigation space where your analysts work incidents together in real time.
The marketplace gives enterprise SOCs broad coverage without building custom connections for every tool. We found the Threat Intelligence Management module a strong differentiator: it adds context to alerts using live threat intelligence, helping analysts separate high-impact threats from background noise.
Automated workflows handle alert triage and prioritization, reducing manual overhead at scale. The war room keeps collaborative investigation structured and documented throughout the incident lifecycle.
Customers running large environments report strong performance at scale, with validated deployments at 65,000+ endpoints. Users have flagged the customization depth and playbook flexibility as standout capabilities for complex incident response workflows.
Reporting and configuration draw the most criticism. Customers say reporting customization feels limited relative to the platform’s overall depth. Users have also flagged that initial configuration carries a steep learning curve and that on-premises deployments require meaningful ongoing maintenance.
We think Cortex XSOAR suits enterprise SOC teams with the headcount and maturity to configure and maintain it properly. If your environment already runs Palo Alto tooling, the native integrations and Unit 42 threat intelligence create a tight picture across detection and response.
Smaller teams or those without dedicated SOAR engineers get less return from the platform’s depth. Based on our review, we think it is one of the stronger enterprise SOAR options for teams ready to invest in configuration.
Rapid7 InsightConnect is a SOAR platform built for large organizations looking to automate security operations across a wide toolset. It focuses on practical automation for common threat scenarios, including phishing and ransomware, while supporting proactive vulnerability management workflows.
InsightConnect connects with over 200 plugins and integrates with ITSM tools including ServiceNow and Jira, keeping security workflows linked to your ticketing and change management processes. We found the options to keep human decision-making inside automated workflows a practical design choice for teams that want speed without removing analyst oversight entirely.
Automated responses target high-frequency threats like phishing and ransomware directly. The proactive vulnerability management workflows extend SOAR beyond reactive incident response into earlier detection stages.
The available customer feedback covers the broader Rapid7 platform rather than InsightConnect specifically, so we’ve used it selectively where signals are likely to cross over.
Where feedback does apply, customers say initial setup is straightforward and the interface is easy to navigate. Users have flagged configuration challenges during onboarding, particularly around network parameters and discovery scan setup, which can slow initial deployment.
We think InsightConnect works best for large organizations with diverse toolsets that need to connect security, IT, and operations workflows in one automation layer. The ITSM integrations are particularly strong if your team runs incident response alongside ServiceNow or Jira change management.
For smaller teams without existing Rapid7 investment, the platform’s depth adds cost without proportional return. Based on our review, we think InsightConnect is a strong option for organizations ready to standardize workflows at scale.
Splunk SOAR is an enterprise platform combining playbook automation, infrastructure orchestration, case management, and threat intelligence. Formerly known as Splunk Phantom, it serves teams that need to automate repetitive security tasks at machine speed across a diverse toolset.
The platform ships with over 350 tool integrations and 100 ready-to-use playbooks, with a code-free visual editor for building custom automation. We found the visual playbook editor the most frequently praised capability: analysts can build and deploy complex workflows without scripting knowledge.
Case management and a mobile app keep incident handling accessible across your team, whether analysts are at a workstation or not. Pre-built playbooks provide a starting point that lets teams reach operational automation without building from scratch.
Customers say the platform integrates smoothly with existing tools and becomes part of daily security workflow once teams move past initial setup. Users have flagged the visual playbook editor and machine-speed automation as real productivity advantages during active incidents.
Cost and learning curve draw consistent criticism. Customers say the platform is expensive, particularly for smaller organizations, and documentation falls short of what a complex platform requires. Users have also flagged that the UI needs improvement and initial configuration takes time to master.
We think Splunk SOAR suits enterprise SOC teams already running Splunk infrastructure or with the resources to invest in onboarding properly. If your team handles high volumes of repetitive tasks, the playbook depth and integration coverage pay off over time.
For smaller organizations and teams sensitive to cost, the pricing is harder to justify. Based on our review, we think Splunk SOAR is a strong platform for enterprise operations ready to commit to it fully.
Swimlane SOAR is a low-code hyperautomation platform built for enterprise SOCs, MSSPs, and regulated sectors including financial services and federal government. The Turbine platform, powered by Hero AI, executes 25 million actions daily, suited to teams managing high-volume security operations at scale.
The Canvas builder reduces playbook creation time by up to three times, letting analysts build remediation workflows without deep coding skills. We found Hero AI particularly strong: it provides AI-driven insights that actively improve workflows in real time, not just after incidents close.
The Infinite Integrations Fabric connects hundreds of pre-built tools, and dynamic case management covers over 72 customizable fields. Business intelligence dashboards track ROI directly, useful for security leaders who need to justify automation investment to stakeholders.
Users have flagged platform reliability as a standout, with cloud deployments reporting consistent uptime over extended periods. Customers say setup speed is a real advantage, with basic automations running quickly after initial configuration.
Customer service draws consistent praise across government, enterprise, and SMB segments. Users describe support as fast, helpful, and reliable. The platform’s customization depth does carry a learning investment, with customers noting a high ceiling that takes time to reach.
We think Swimlane SOAR works best for enterprise SOCs and MSSPs scaling security operations without growing headcount proportionally. The AI-driven workflow optimization and ROI tracking suit security leaders accountable to business outcomes.
If your team is in the early stages of security automation, the platform’s depth delivers more over time. Based on our review, we think Swimlane is one of the more mature low-code SOAR options for enterprise and regulated sector operations.
Torq is an autonomous SOC platform built around AI-driven threat intelligence and automated remediation. It targets organizations that need to detect, prioritize, and respond to threats without scaling analyst headcount to match alert volume.
Torq uses AI to integrate threat intelligence feeds, blocking malicious domains, email accounts, and IP addresses autonomously. We found the orchestration approach well-suited to organizations looking to reduce analyst decision fatigue on common, repetitive threats.
The platform provides visibility into complex attack scope and impact, with customizable access control to match your team structure. Incident management centralizes all related activity, discussions, and alerts in one location, keeping investigations from fragmenting across tools.
Customers say the platform integrates with multiple tools and displays workflows visually, cutting errors in complex automation builds. Users have flagged licensing complexity and that advanced features benefit from prior development knowledge.
We think Torq works best for organizations that want to reduce analyst workload through autonomous threat response. If your team handles high volumes of threat intelligence and needs consistent, automated action on known indicators, the platform’s AI-driven approach directly addresses that.
The limited SOAR-specific customer evidence is worth noting for buyers who rely on peer validation. Based on our review, we think Torq is worth evaluating for teams prioritizing autonomous threat response at scale.
No-code next-gen SOAR alternative designed for automating security workflows at scale.
Built-in automation and response features integrated with Logpoint SIEM.
Scalable SOAR with codeless playbooks and deep integration support.
This article was written by Alex Zawalnyski, the Copy Manager at Expert Insights, who works alongside software experts to research, write, fact-check, and edit articles relating to B2B cyber security and technology solutions. This article has been technically reviewed by our technical researcher, Laura Iannini, who has experience with a range of cybersecurity platforms and conducts thorough product tests to ensure that Expert Insights’ reviews are definitive and insightful.
Research for this guide included:
This guide is updated at least every 3 months to review the vendors included and ensure that the features listed are up to date.
Who is this Shortlist for?
SOAR solutions are best suited to large enterprises or MSSPs that have a dedicated, experienced, in-house security team. As such, we’ve written this Shortlist for larger organizations looking to streamline already-established processes for event analysis and incident response.
How was the Shortlist picked?
When considering SOAR solutions, we evaluated providers based on the following criterion:
Features: Based on conversations with vendors, end customers, and our own testing, we selected the following key features:
Based on our experience in the SecOps and broader cybersecurity market, we have also considered several other factors, such as the benefit of consolidating multiple features into a single platform, the quality of the admin interface, the customer support on offer, and other use cases.
This list is designed to be a selection of the best SOAR providers. Many leading solutions have not been included in this list, with no criticism intended.
Selecting the right Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) solution involves aligning the platform with your organization’s security operations, tool ecosystem, and resource constraints. Consider these key steps to make an informed choice:
Assess Your Security Environment: Evaluate your existing tools (e.g., SIEM, EDR, firewalls), alert volume, and incident response needs to ensure the SOAR integrates seamlessly and addresses key pain points like alert fatigue or manual workflows.
Define Operational and Compliance Goals: Identify priorities such as reducing mean time to respond (MTTR), automating repetitive tasks, or meeting compliance standards (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) to guide feature requirements and playbook customization.
Prioritize Scalability and Flexibility: Choose a solution that scales with your network growth, supports multi-vendor integrations, and adapts to evolving threats or hybrid environments without requiring extensive reconfiguration.
Focus on critical features to ensure efficient incident management and automation:
Broad Integration Ecosystem: Look for platforms with extensive pre-built integrations (e.g., Splunk SOAR’s 350+ tools, FortiSOAR’s 3,000+ actions) to connect SIEMs, EDRs, and threat intelligence feeds for unified workflows.
Customizable Playbooks and Automation: Prioritize solutions with no-code or low-code playbook editors (e.g., ServiceNow SIR’s Azure Logic Apps, Swimlane’s low-code automation) to automate tasks like alert triage or malware containment.
AI-Driven Threat Intelligence: Ensure AI and machine learning for alert enrichment, anomaly detection, and playbook optimization (e.g., Cortex XSOAR’s ML-based suggestions, Splunk SOAR’s MITRE ATT&CK mapping) to enhance response accuracy.
Collaboration and Case Management: Verify real-time collaboration tools, war rooms, and centralized dashboards (e.g., IBM QRadar SOAR’s case management, Devo SOAR’s intuitive workflows) to streamline SOC teamwork and reporting.
Balance functionality with usability to maximize adoption and efficiency:
User-Friendly Interface: Avoid complex platforms that overwhelm analysts, opting for intuitive interfaces and visual editors (e.g., Rapid7 InsightConnect’s plugin-based UI) to simplify playbook creation and incident tracking.
Vendor Support Quality: Select providers with 24/7 support, detailed documentation, and resources like training or communities (e.g., Splunk SOAR’s guided tours) to assist with onboarding and optimization.
Testing and Trials: Use demos, free trials (e.g., offered by Splunk SOAR or FortiSOAR), or independent user reviews to validate integration ease, automation effectiveness, and performance before committing.
Our guide to the leading Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response solutions provides a comprehensive overview of platforms designed to streamline security operations, automate repetitive tasks, and accelerate incident response. The article evaluates tools based on features like broad integrations, customizable playbooks, AI-driven threat intelligence, and robust case management, catering to organizations of all sizes. It emphasizes balancing automation, scalability, and collaboration to reduce alert fatigue, enhance SOC efficiency, and strengthen security posture in cloud, on-premises, or hybrid environments facing sophisticated cyber threats.
Key Takeaways:
Unified Security Operations: Top SOAR solutions integrate disparate tools, providing centralized visibility and automated workflows to reduce manual effort and response times.
Intelligent Automation: Choose platforms with AI-driven playbooks and low-code editors to prioritize high-risk alerts and streamline tasks like phishing response or endpoint quarantine.
Scalable and Collaborative: Prioritize solutions with flexible deployments and real-time collaboration features to support growing SOCs and ensure compliance with standards like GDPR or HIPAA.
We’ve explored the leading SOAR solutions, highlighting how these tools empower organizations to automate security workflows, enhance collaboration, and respond to threats faster. Now, we’d love to hear your perspective—what’s your experience with SOAR platforms? Are features like no-code automation, AI-driven threat intelligence, or seamless integrations critical for your organization’s SOC strategy?
Selecting the right SOAR solution can transform how you manage cyber incidents, but challenges like integration complexity or playbook customization can arise. Have you found a standout platform that’s optimized your security operations, or encountered hurdles with scalability or usability? Share your insights to help other organizations navigate the SOAR landscape and choose the best tool for their needs.
Let us know which solution you recommend to help us improve our list!
SOAR solutions collect and analyze information from all the tools in your cybersecurity stack. By centralizing this data, they make it easier to identify threats and understand their potential impact, so your SOC team can remediate them more efficiently.
SOAR tools typically follow three stages:
SIEM stands for Security Information and Event Management. These tools collect and log cybersecurity event data from across your network, including your servers, applications, and databases. If it detects anything suspicious or anomalous, the SIEM solution sends an alert to the SOC team.
SOAR solutions work in a similar way – they start by monitoring and detecting networks events. However, rather than just sending a notification, SOAR tools can automatically respond to and remediate the issue.
Some issues are too complex for SOAR solutions to automatically remediate. In these instances, the tool will triage the threat, then notify the SOC team and guide them through the remediation process.
SOAR solutions require ongoing effort, engagement, and support—as well as analysts that can handle setting up playbooks, automating workflows, and following best practices.
Because of this, SOAR solutions tend to be best suited to large organizations or Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) with an experienced security team, and which want to streamline their already-established incident analysis and response processes.
Implementing SOAR provides organizations with several key advantages:
A comprehensive SOAR platform typically includes the following essential components:
Alex is an experienced journalist and content editor. He researches, writes, factchecks and edits articles relating to B2B cyber security and technology solutions, working alongside software experts.
Alex was awarded a First Class MA (Hons) in English and Scottish Literature by the University of Edinburgh.
Laura Iannini is a Cybersecurity Analyst at Expert Insights. With deep cybersecurity knowledge and strong research skills, she leads Expert Insights’ product testing team, conducting thorough tests of product features and in-depth industry analysis to ensure that Expert Insights’ product reviews are definitive and insightful.
Laura also carries out wider analysis of vendor landscapes and industry trends to inform Expert Insights’ enterprise cybersecurity buyers’ guides, covering topics such as security awareness training, cloud backup and recovery, email security, and network monitoring. Prior to working at Expert Insights, Laura worked as a Senior Information Security Engineer at Constant Edge, where she tested cybersecurity solutions, carried out product demos, and provided high-quality ongoing technical support.
Laura holds a Bachelor’s degree in Cybersecurity from the University of West Florida.