Technical Review by
Craig MacAlpine
For unlimited retention without storage limits, TitanHQ Email Archiving stores emails indefinitely for departed employees at no additional cost while fast search retrieves specific emails from years of data in seconds. Mass deploying the Outlook add-in across large organizations challenges administrators.
If you need multi-channel compliance archiving, Intradyn captures email, Teams, SMS, and social media in one platform with eDiscovery supporting 100+ languages and proximity search. Social media content archives in email format rather than native page layouts.
When you want vendor lock-in protection, Barracuda Cloud Archiving integrates with its email security products while unlimited per-user storage removes capacity planning overhead. Interface feels dated compared to newer archiving solutions.
Email archiving feels like it should be straightforward. You need to keep emails, find them later, and prove you did it right when auditors ask. Yet the market floats between expensive enterprise platforms and simple solutions that feel like they’ll crumble under regulatory scrutiny.
The real problem isn’t finding a tool that stores emails. The problem is finding one that stores them compliantly, retrieves them quickly, and doesn’t require a second mortgage to implement. Get it wrong and you face months of botched e-Discovery requests, compliance failures that regulators catch, or bills that climb faster than your organizational needs.
We evaluated multiple email archiving solutions across cloud and hybrid deployments, evaluating each for storage flexibility, search performance, e-Discovery capabilities, compliance coverage, and operational complexity. We examined how vendors handle multi-tenant environments, their approach to retention policies, and how well they integrate with modern communication platforms like Teams. We also reviewed customer feedback to identify where implementations stumble.
Your ideal choice depends on retention scope, multi-channel needs, and regulatory requirements for your industry.
TitanHQ Email Archiving (also known as ArcTitan) is a cloud-based archiving solution focused on compliance and long-term retention. We think it’s one of the stronger options for mid-sized organizations and MSPs that want affordable, compliant archiving without managing on-premises hardware. The unlimited storage model is a standout; departed employees don’t require ongoing licenses, which keeps long-term costs predictable.
ArcTitan captures messages automatically and stores them in encrypted, tamper-proof format. Search speeds are strong, pulling specific emails from years of data in seconds rather than minutes. The Outlook integration lets users access archived mail without leaving their inbox, and retention policies handle GDPR, HIPAA, and industry-specific requirements out of the box. The admin console scales well for environments with thousands of mailboxes, and the per-mailbox pricing model keeps costs aligned to actual usage.
Customers mention competitive pricing and straightforward setup. Support teams get positive marks for responsiveness during onboarding. The per-mailbox model gets praise specifically because departed employees don’t generate ongoing costs. With that said, some users flag the Outlook add-in as tricky to mass deploy across large environments. If you’re rolling this out to hundreds of desktops, plan extra time for that piece.
We think TitanHQ works well for mid-sized organizations and MSPs managing multiple tenants who need affordable, compliant archiving. If you’re in a regulated industry or facing frequent eDiscovery requests, the search capabilities and compliance coverage justify evaluation. The unlimited storage with no departed-employee fees is a genuine cost advantage over many alternatives in this category.
Intradyn is an archiving and eDiscovery platform that captures email, Teams chats, SMS, and social media from a single interface. We think it’s one of the stronger options for compliance-heavy North American organizations that need to archive beyond just email. The standalone architecture is a plus; it’s not bundled with spam filtering, so you can swap security vendors without touching your archive.
Intradyn captures messages in real time via standard protocols while also grabbing Teams conversations and social media content. Everything lands in the same searchable archive with unlimited AWS storage. The eDiscovery tools handle searches across 100+ languages with proximity and keyword matching, and legal hold automation with built-in redaction speeds up litigation response. Retention policies offer granular control down to individual users, departments, or domains. A free crawler tool handles historical data ingestion, which simplifies onboarding from legacy systems.
Customers praise the straightforward interface and responsive support team. The standalone architecture gets positive mentions since you can change security vendors without migration headaches. Some customers report running the platform successfully for over a decade without data loss. Something to be aware of is that social media content archives in email format rather than native page layouts, which may matter if visual context is important for your compliance needs.
We think Intradyn works well if your compliance requirements extend beyond email into Teams and social channels. The unified search across content types saves time during investigations and legal requests, and the 100+ language support makes it a strong option for multinational organizations. The free crawler tool for historical migration is a nice touch that reduces onboarding costs.
Barracuda Cloud Archiving Service is a cloud-native archiving platform bundled into Barracuda’s broader Email Protection suite. We think it’s a strong fit for organizations already invested in Barracuda’s security stack who want archiving without adding another vendor. Unlimited per-user storage removes capacity planning entirely, and the cloud deployment eliminates server management overhead.
Automatic archiving captures every message with customizable retention policies. The fully indexed archive supports eDiscovery with filtering, tagging, and legal hold. End users access their own archives through an M365 plugin on any device, and role-based access controls who searches what. The Outlook Add-In with local cache stands out for remote and hybrid teams, providing offline access to archived emails. Barracuda has recently updated the end-user interface with a more modern look and sidebar navigation.
Customers praise fast retrieval and straightforward setup. Support gets high marks, particularly for legal teams running frequent searches. Law firms and compliance-heavy organizations appreciate how quickly staff get productive with the search interface. However, users consistently flag the admin interface as dated. Search syntax has quirks that trip people up; you need to structure OR conditions before AND conditions, which isn’t immediately obvious.
We think Barracuda makes sense if you’re already running Barracuda for email security or backup. The unified management reduces complexity, and the offline access capability via the Outlook Add-In addresses a real gap that other archiving tools miss. For M365 environments wanting consolidated protection and archiving under one vendor, the integration works smoothly.
Global Relay Archive targets heavily regulated industries needing to archive communications across 50+ platforms. The vendor serves 22 of the top 25 global banks, which tells you exactly who this is built for. We think it’s one of the strongest options for financial services, healthcare, and government organizations where compliance failures carry serious consequences.
Global Relay covers an impressive range of regulatory frameworks: SEC, FINRA, HIPAA, GDPR, and MiFID II. The platform archives email, instant messaging from platforms like Bloomberg and Teams, mobile messaging, SMS, and social media including LinkedIn. Each archived item gets unique AES encryption, and immutable storage with contextual metadata makes audit responses straightforward. The AI-driven eDiscovery reconstructs conversations with full context, which speeds up investigations. Corporate directory integration tracks organizational changes automatically, so when someone moves departments or leaves, access rights follow.
Customers praise the search and analytics capabilities. Support teams get strong marks for hands-on help during migrations. Government and financial services users appreciate how the interface works for non-technical staff running compliance searches. Something to be aware of is that customers flag a steep learning curve during initial onboarding. Cost comes up frequently, with smaller organizations finding it expensive for their needs. You also cannot self-service data purges, even court-ordered ones.
We think Global Relay fits organizations where compliance failures carry serious consequences. If you’re in financial services, healthcare, or government with strict retention mandates, the regulatory coverage and AI-driven eDiscovery justify the investment and complexity. The 50+ channel coverage is among the broadest in this category, which is good to see for organizations with diverse communication environments.
Libraesva Email Archiver offers both cloud and on-premises deployment with flexible storage options including local disks, network shares, and S3-compatible object storage. We think it’s a strong fit for MSPs needing multi-tenant management and organizations with specific data residency or infrastructure requirements. The deployment flexibility is a genuine differentiator in a category where most solutions are cloud-only.
AES 256-bit encryption with certified time-stamping handles GDPR compliance requirements. The Outlook Add-In lets users access archived mail without switching to a separate portal, and integration covers all major mail servers including Office 365, Exchange, and Gmail. Multi-tenant architecture makes this practical for MSPs managing multiple clients, with a full API for automation. The platform offers over 80 distinct access permissions and a dedicated Privacy Officer role, which is good to see for organizations with strict data governance needs.
Customers highlight the fast interface and powerful search capabilities. Organizations handling high email volumes appreciate the quick integration with existing mail platforms. The learning curve stays manageable even for teams without deep technical expertise. With that said, the platform lacks the name recognition of larger competitors, and customers report the search functionality takes some time to master fully.
We think Libraesva works well for organizations already in the Libraesva ecosystem or MSPs building a multi-tenant archiving practice. The storage flexibility suits environments with specific data residency requirements, and the certified time-stamping for GDPR is a differentiator. If you need on-premises archiving or operate as an MSP managing multiple tenants, it’s well worth considering.
Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving is the native archiving solution built into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. We think it’s the path of least resistance for M365 organizations with straightforward email retention needs. It’s included in many M365 plans, which eliminates separate licensing costs entirely, and the Outlook integration means users access their archive without learning a new tool.
Users access their archive mailbox directly within Outlook and can search or restore deleted emails without IT involvement. Customizable retention policies work at folder, conversation, or message level, and legal hold capabilities support indefinite retention for litigation. The eDiscovery tools search emails, attachments, contacts, and calendar items with keyword and filter options. Microsoft is rolling out an auto-archiving feature that automatically moves the oldest emails to the archive once a mailbox reaches 96% of its storage quota. Archive mailboxes with auto-expanding archive are included in M365 E3 and E5 plans.
Customers praise how easily the archive reduces primary mailbox load while maintaining availability. Users create subfolders and categorize archived mail without training. The single-license approach eliminates third-party software complexity. However, organizations needing advanced eDiscovery or multi-channel archiving will hit limitations. The platform handles email well but doesn’t extend to Teams, social media, or SMS like dedicated solutions.
We think Exchange Online Archiving works well for M365 environments with straightforward email archiving needs. If you’re managing mailbox sizes and basic compliance without complex regulatory requirements, the native integration and included licensing are hard to beat on value. But if you need multi-channel coverage, advanced eDiscovery, or supervision features, you’ll need to look at dedicated archiving platforms.
Mimecast Cloud Archive provides cloud archiving for email and Microsoft Teams as part of its broader security platform. We think it’s best suited for enterprises already invested in, or planning to adopt, Mimecast’s email security who want unified retention and compliance. The Teams archiving coverage is thorough, which is a strong selling point for organizations standardizing on Microsoft collaboration tools.
Mimecast captures one-to-one, group, and channel Teams conversations alongside traditional email, archiving metadata like send time, device, and location. Unlimited storage removes capacity planning headaches. Near real-time search speeds up eDiscovery, and proactive compliance scanning via Microsoft Supervision flags potential risks automatically. The platform covers SEC, FINRA, and HIPAA requirements with audit logging throughout. Recent updates added unified search across additional collaboration platforms including Slack, along with AI-driven insights for sentiment analysis.
Customers praise the automatic archiving that runs without ongoing effort. End users search their own archives via Outlook plugin or web portal, reducing IT support tickets. Government and healthcare organizations appreciate meeting retention requirements without complexity. Something to be aware of is that customers consistently flag the admin console as clunky and slow. Initial migration of historical archives can also require significant effort.
We think Mimecast works best for enterprises already using Mimecast’s email security. The tight integration reduces vendor sprawl, and the Teams archiving coverage is one of the more thorough implementations we’ve seen. If you need to archive both email and Teams under one roof with proactive compliance scanning, it covers that well.
Proofpoint Archive is an enterprise-scale archiving platform for email, social media, SMS, and collaboration data. We think it’s a strong fit for large organizations in regulated industries that need multi-channel coverage and geography-specific retention policies. This is the enterprise product, distinct from Proofpoint Essentials, and it’s built for organizations with more than 1,500 users and complex policy requirements.
The data type coverage is extensive. Email, social media, SMS, and collaboration tools all feed into a single searchable archive. Geography-specific retention policies handle multinational compliance requirements, which is valuable for global organizations. The intelligent search functionality comes included without per-query fees, which is a cost advantage over some alternatives. The modern dashboard presents compliance data through graphs and visualizations, and automated legal hold maintains full audit trails. End users get self-service access to their own archives.
Customers praise the search speed and user-friendly interface for day-to-day operations. Compliance officers appreciate the reporting capabilities, and integration with hybrid Exchange environments works smoothly. Regular product updates add useful features over time. With that said, users flag the role management process as complex, particularly when using Active Directory groups. Auditing permissions across AD groups frustrates internal audit teams, and shared mailbox licensing adds cost at scale.
We think Proofpoint Archive fits large enterprises with complex, multi-channel compliance requirements. If you’re archiving beyond just email and need geography-specific policies with a modern reporting dashboard, it handles that scope well. The managed service option reduces the operational burden for stretched IT teams. If you’re a smaller organization, Proofpoint Essentials may be a better fit.
Smarsh Archive captures communications across 100+ digital channels for regulated organizations, serving top banks across North America, Europe, and Asia. We think it’s one of the strongest options for financial services firms that need to archive email, mobile, voice, instant messaging, and web data from a single platform. The channel coverage is among the broadest we’ve seen in this category.
Smarsh provides native capture across email, mobile, voice, IM, and web data, preserving content in native formats and categorizing messages by direction and internal versus external. Integration with major email platforms works through journaling. The search engine returns granular results quickly with exports to multiple formats for compliance teams. Supervision policies flag potential risks automatically, and a built-in policy library accelerates setup for surveillance workflows. The platform supports SEC Rule 17a-4 WORM storage and FINRA Rules 4511 and 3110 for defensible recordkeeping. End users access historical emails through the Personal Archive feature without IT involvement.
Customers praise the smooth onboarding and implementation process. The policy library gets positive mentions for surveillance workflows, and search accuracy during audits is reliable. Integration rarely disrupts normal operations. However, users consistently flag the interface as dated and less intuitive than expected. Some report the platform occasionally hangs when loading alerts, which impacts daily compliance review workflows.
We think Smarsh works well for regulated financial services firms needing broad channel coverage with active supervision. If your compliance team monitors communications across email, mobile, and messaging platforms daily, the unified archive with configurable alerts and policy enforcement reduces complexity. The 100+ channel coverage with API extensibility is good to see for organizations with diverse communication environments.
Trustifi Cloud Email Archive bundles archiving with AI-powered email security, including threat protection and Data Loss Prevention. We think it’s a strong option for Microsoft 365 organizations that want both capabilities from a single vendor without managing multiple tools. The AI-driven features extend beyond passive archiving into active protection, which sets it apart from standalone archiving platforms.
Trustifi archives emails with 256-bit AES encryption and redundancy across multiple data centers. Customizable retention policies and real-time access monitoring handle compliance requirements. The AI-powered threat detection identifies phishing attempts and can disable compromised accounts automatically. DLP rules protect sensitive data in transit and at rest. Deployment integrates smoothly with M365 without disrupting existing workflows, and the vendor releases features frequently.
Customers consistently rate support as exceptional, comparing it favorably to enterprise-level vendors. When issues arise requiring patches, the team responds and ships fixes quickly. Feature requests get taken seriously and often make it into the product, which is good to see. With that said, customers note the admin interface has many advanced options that can overwhelm new administrators. Some users also report that aggressive quarantine settings increase the review workload for admins.
We think Trustifi fits organizations wanting email security and archiving from one vendor. If you’re evaluating both capabilities simultaneously, the integrated platform simplifies procurement and management. The support team’s responsiveness and willingness to act on feature requests suggests a vendor that’s actively investing in the product.
On-premises and cloud archiving with simple management and eDiscovery.
Google Workspace integrated archiving with retention and legal hold.
Email archiving with granular search and retention policy controls.
Scalable email archiving with advanced analytics and compliance.
Evaluating email archiving solutions requires careful attention to how they handle your specific compliance and operational needs. Here are the essential criteria:
Weight these based on your environment. Heavily regulated industries should prioritize regulatory framework coverage and legal hold capabilities. Multi-tenant MSPs need flexible retention policies and strong per-client isolation. Small organizations may prioritize cost-effectiveness and ease of management.
Expert Insights is an independent editorial team that evaluates email archiving solutions. We do not accept payment for favorable reviews. Our scores reflect product quality only.
We evaluated 10 email archiving platforms across Microsoft 365, hybrid, and on premises environments. We evaluated storage flexibility, search performance, e-Discovery capabilities, regulatory framework coverage, and deployment complexity. Each solution was deployed in enterprise-scale conditions simulating real-world compliance and operational requirements.
Beyond hands on testing, we conducted vendor interviews and reviewed customer feedback to understand where implementations stumble. We examined how well vendors support multi-tenant environments, handle complex retention policies, and respond to urgent compliance requests. We mapped the full archiving vendor market to identify market leaders, alongside strong alternatives and emerging challengers.
This guide is updated quarterly. For complete details on our methodology, visit our How We Test & Review Products.
Email archiving isn’t one-size-fits-all.
If you run a mid-market environment, balancing compliance and cost, TitanHQ Email Archiving delivers unlimited storage, fast search, and predictable per-mailbox pricing. The straightforward M365 integration suits most deployments.
For enterprises needing multi-channel coverage, Proofpoint Archive handles email, Teams, social media, and SMS in one platform. Geography-specific policies support global deployments.
If you operate in financial services, healthcare, or government with strict compliance mandates, Global Relay Archive covers SEC, FINRA, HIPAA, and GDPR frameworks. AI-driven e-Discovery reconstructs conversations with context. Choose this when compliance failures carry serious consequences.
For Teams environments, Mimecast Cloud Archive thoroughly archives both email and Teams conversations with proactive compliance scanning.
If you’re already in Microsoft 365 with straightforward retention needs, Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving requires no additional vendor or cost. Users access archives directly in Outlook.
Read the individual reviews above for deployment specifics, pricing details, and the trade-offs that matter for your environment.
Email archiving is the system of storing your email communication so they can later be retrieved, typically for legal and auditing purposes.
Email archiving solutions allow you to store tamper-proof, immutable copies of each and every email your organization sends and receives. Most email archiving solutions capture email content directly from the email client itself, or during transport, so the entire process occurs without any added work for IT teams or end users. These emails are stored separately to your main email client so that if you change company email systems, delete every email in your inbox, or your company network is wiped, you’ll still have copies of all your original emails.
Many email archives today are cloud-based, allowing you to access your stored emails from any device, at any time. They often also include e-discovery features, which allow you to search the archive for specific emails by attributes such as recipient, sender, time, attachment type, and subject.
Once you have found the emails you are looking for, or even if you need to bulk export every email from a particular month for example, archiving solutions make it easy to restore past emails and attachments.
Typically, third-party email archiving solutions work via the process journaling. Email journaling records all communications within the email archiving solution. The journaling system creates copies of all email messages and stores them in a secure, searchable database. This process can be customized based on your organization’s specific journaling and retention policies.
When deploying an email archiving solution to your email environment, for example Microsoft 365, you need to add a journaling rule in the admin center, which tells your email provider (e.g., Microsoft) to send emails to your chosen archiving database. Most email archiving solutions provide an in-depth guide to deployment based on specific steps required.
However, there are many different approaches to email archiving, and the specifics of how email archiving works can differ based on the approach used. Many users will be familiar with the email archiving functionality offered natively within Microsoft Outlook or Google Mail, in which archived emails are sent to a separate Archive folder. But this use case is meant for end-users to manage their emails more effectively, not for IT departments or compliance use cases.
When an end-user archives an email in Outlook or Google Mail, it is removed from their inbox and placed in a separate folder. From there, archived emails can be deleted or moved back to the inbox. Without an additional third-party email archiving solution, this does not ensure archived messages are kept secure and immutable.
When using an enterprise email archiving solution, a copy of every single inbound, outbound, or internal email is stored in a secure repository, where emails can be searched, placed on legal hold, and recovered. Meta-data and attachments can also be viewed.
This repository is usually cloud-based and accessible by admins, auditors, and legal compliance teams. Sometimes the cloud-archive can also be accessed by end-users, who can use the service to search through their own archive and view messages that have been lost or accidentally deleted.
There are several reasons that organizations should archive emails, particularly those in heavily regulated industries such as legal services, healthcare, government, and finance.
Common reasons for implementing email archiving tools include:
Email archiving solutions should be optimized for easy deployment, hands-off management, and fast search and retrieval when required. Key features to look for in an email archiving solution include:
The most common use case for email archiving solutions is to ensure compliance with auditing and data regulation requirements. As such, ensuring the solution you choose enables full legal compliance should be the first and most important feature that you consider.
This should include ensuring that all emails are automatically archived, along with attachments and meta-data that outlines where the email was sent, at what time, and to whom. It should also include details on replies, email chains and forwarding.
Archived emails should also be fully immutable. Nobody should be able to edit or tamper with archived data; this is an important stipulation in many legal regulations.
Compliance also means auditing who has access to the email archive. The best archiving solutions will provide granular permissions management with auditing over when the archive has been accessed.
Another important part of ensuring legal compliance is ensuring the archived data itself has tight security controls. Archived emails should be fully encrypted to ensure malicious threat actors are not able to compromise any sensitive information that may be held in email records.
We recommend looking for a system that protects archived emails when in transit and at rest. Proofpoint recommends that any data centers used to house cloud archived emails should be SSAE-16 SOC 2 Type II certified.
In addition, there should also be strong security controls to govern who has access to the archive. As previously mentioned, look for a solution with granular permissions management for accessing the archive, with comprehensive auditing. We also recommend that any access to the archive is reinforced with comprehensive multi-factor authentication.
Finally, we also recommend looking for a solution that has multiple layers of backup in different file formats. When storing backups of any type of data, you should follow the rule of “3 2 1”: store at least three copies of your data in two different locations, and at least one copy should be in a different format or medium to the others.
This means if one archive is corrupted or lost, you can easily recover data by switching to another backup method. Each one of these should again be secured with high levels of data security.
Arguably the most important feature on this list is the ability for auditors, admins or even end-users to be able to easily search the email archive to find data when needed. It’s great to have a legally compliant platform with excellent data security, but if the platform is impossible to use to actually find and export data when needed, the platform has failed.
So, a key feature to look out for is a well-designed user interface that should be simple to navigate and quick to return search results. A system that takes hours to search through an archive is not scalable for organizations that need to retain data over a period of years.
But as well as being simple to use, a good archiving platform will have comprehensive e-discovery functionality to return the results you actually want to see. You should be able to search on granular pre-defined filters, such as sender, recipient, date, and subject line. You should also be able to easily export particular emails and chains when needed, without having to go through a costly or time-consuming process.
This in and of itself is important also to the compliance use case. If auditors are unable to use an archiving system to find any emails related to a litigation case, for example, then it’s possible you could breach compliance regulations.
In addition, the e-discovery archive should also be available even when your email network is down. This is important in ensuring business continuity, giving users access to their inbox at all times.
There are many ways that email archiving can be deployed across an organization, but for most businesses we recommend looking for a cloud-based email archiving solution.
Most organizations today use cloud-based email platforms such as Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace; cloud-based email archiving solutions can integrate natively with these platforms, speeding up the deployment process and saving businesses valuable time.
In addition, cloud-based archiving can also be more cost effective and reliable, with fewer outages and downtime than legacy on-premises alternatives. Storage costs can also be lower with cloud-based solutions, and cloud-storage is often more scalable.
However, some organizations may be already using an on-premises email archiving solution but looking to move to the cloud. In this case, we recommend looking for a cloud-based provider with low costs for important legacy data, or using a hybrid email archiving approach, choosing a provider that offers both an on-premises and cloud-based solution.
Some organizations may also need file archiving alongside email archiving; in this instance, we recommend looking for an email archiving solution that also offers file and data archiving.
Legal hold is an important factor to consider when choosing an email archiving provider. This is the process of storing emails in anticipation of them being used in a litigation event or audit. It’s important that whichever email archiving solution you choose offers legal hold, covering the period of time you need.
Flexibility more broadly is an important aspect of email archiving. It’s important to choose a flexible service that stores emails for as long as you need them––we recommend a minimum of ten years––but many businesses will need to archive important emails for far longer.
However, over such a period of time, storage costs can become expensive, especially for organizations heavily reliant on email. For this reason, it’s a good idea to look for a service that only stores certain important emails long term, rather than spam messages like newsletters. Less important, external emails may only need to be archived for short periods of time, perhaps 12 months.
The best recommendation we can give for this particular point is to consider all the storage costs associated, along with your organizations’ particular use cases and compliance requirements, and look for a service flexible enough to meet your needs.
The final thing to look for in any archiving solution is the cost of importing and exporting data, and the archiving format. For many organizations email archiving represents a long-term commitment––this is not a solution you are likely to swap out on a regular basis.
For this reason, it’s a good idea to ensure that costs associated for migrating data into the archive, exporting data from the archive, and long-term storage costs are within your organization’s budget.
It’s also a good idea to check that the archiving provider you choose offers an open archiving format, so if for whatever reason you do need to export data into a different system, it’s not locked to a proprietary archiving system or data type.
Exporting data to a competitor’s archiving system can also have hidden costs, so it’s a good idea to thoroughly check the small print on any archiving solution you are considering.
When looking to implement an email archiving solution, organizations must build out a comprehensive strategy, outlining specific requirements such as retention policies and key data compliance regulations to follow. Combining this with the above features will help teams to ensure a successful email archiving deployment.
Joel is the Director of Content and a co-founder at Expert Insights; a rapidly growing media company focussed on covering cybersecurity solutions.
He’s an experienced journalist and editor with 8 years’ experience covering the cybersecurity space. He’s reviewed hundreds of cybersecurity solutions, interviewed hundreds of industry experts and produced dozens of industry reports read by thousands of CISOs and security professionals in topics like IAM, MFA, zero trust, email security, DevSecOps and more.
He also hosts the Expert Insights Podcast and co-writes the weekly newsletter, Decrypted. Joel is driven to share his team’s expertise with cybersecurity leaders to help them create more secure business foundations.
Craig MacAlpine is CEO and Founder of Expert Insights. Before founding Expert Insights in August 2018, Craig spent 10 years as CEO of EPA Cloud, an email security provider that rebranded as VIPRE Email Security following its acquisition by Ziff Davies, formerly J2Global (NASQAQ: ZD) in 2013.
Craig is a passionate security innovator with over 20 years of experience helping organizations to stay secure with cutting-edge information security and cybersecurity solutions.
Using his extensive experience in the email security industry, he founded Expert Insights with the singular goal of helping IT professionals and CISOs to cut through the noise and find the right cybersecurity solutions they need to protect their organizations.