Best 9 Content Management Systems (CMS) For Business (2026)
We reviewed 9 CMS platforms on editing experience, content modeling flexibility, and how well each handles the publishing workflows of organizations managing content across multiple channels and audience segments.
Written by
Joel Witts
Technical Review by
Laura Iannini
Quick Summary
Content Management Systems (CMS) provide the infrastructure for creating, managing, and publishing digital content — with editing workflows, version control, and publishing controls that allow non-technical users to manage content independently. The CMS an organization chooses shapes how efficiently content teams can work and how well the platform adapts to new channels. We reviewed 9 platforms and found Wix Studio CMS, Adobe Experience Manager Sites, and Contentful to be the strongest on editing experience and multi-channel publishing support.
Choosing a content management system means choosing how your team will build, publish, and maintain your web presence for years. The decision shapes hiring, operational workflows, and whether content creation feels frictionless or like a constant struggle against the platform.
The real challenge isn’t finding a CMS that publishes content, it’s finding one that matches your team structure and development practices. Marketing teams want drag-and-drop simplicity and quick updates. Developers want flexibility and integration depth. Content teams want intuitive workflows and no manual data wrangling. Most platforms force compromises that frustrate someone.
We evaluated nine content management systems across authoring workflows, API flexibility, integration capabilities, multi-site management, performance, and the real operational experience for teams managing content daily. We reviewed customer feedback on learning curves, support quality, and whether implementations deliver value or become costly long-term maintenance burdens. The difference between platforms that streamline content operations and those that create bottlenecks is substantial.
This guide gives you the framework to select a CMS that accelerates your content operations instead of becoming a permanent constraint.
Wix Studio CMS is a content management platform designed for designers and developers who need to build and manage complex, content-driven websites. The platform lets you manage website content efficiently and scale it as required, connecting content to elements like galleries and tables to display it dynamically.
Wix Studio CMS Key Features
Wix Studio CMS uses dynamic pages to keep website layouts consistent while content updates automatically, which is a strong feature for sites with large content libraries. The platform includes a full suite of SEO options to enhance search engine rankings, and AI-driven features and no-code animations streamline the development process. It supports multi-site management with account-level analytics and SSO, and translates sites into over 180 languages automatically or manually. The intuitive client dashboard allows clients to manage content safely without compromising design integrity, with robust permissions and privacy settings to control access.
Our Take
We think Wix Studio CMS is a strong option for agencies and developers building content-driven websites where clients need to update content safely and easily. The combination of the Wix CMS, Wix Data API, and CRUD permissions allows developers to write dynamic site visitor inputs to the database with minimal hard-coding. Permission controls safeguard sites, ensuring edits cannot be made by unauthorized users.
Strengths
- Dynamic pages keep layouts consistent while content updates automatically
- AI-driven features and no-code animations streamline development
- Multi-site management with account-level analytics and SSO
- Translates sites into over 180 languages
Cautions
- Pricing not publicly available; requires contacting Wix for a quote
Adobe Experience Manager Sites
Adobe Experience Manager Sites is an enterprise headless CMS powering over 128,000 websites. It’s built for large organizations managing content across multiple brands, regions, and channels. The deep integration with the wider Adobe ecosystem is the core differentiator. We think it delivers clear value for enterprises already invested in the Adobe stack.
Adobe Experience Manager Sites Key Features
The universal drag-and-drop editor gives content teams real independence once components are built out. Authors can construct landing pages, edit in context, and publish without touching code. The DAM ties directly into the authoring workflow, so searching and reusing assets happens in the same environment. Brand-aware generative AI accelerates content creation while staying on brand. Connections to Adobe Analytics and Target close the loop between publishing and performance. Multi-site and multi-language support handles global operations from a single platform.
What Customers Say
Customers say the DAM and Sites workflow together eliminates content silos and saves significant time. The reusable component system keeps output consistent even with large authoring teams. Flexibility to use various CDN providers gets praise from technical teams. Something to be aware of is that the learning curve is steep; expect weeks of onboarding before authors work independently. Changes outside pre-set templates require developer involvement, which can create bottlenecks.
Our Take
We think AEM Sites justifies its investment for large enterprises running multiple brands across regions with tight analytics requirements. Enterprise licensing starts at $200,000+ annually, with implementation costs ranging from $100,000 to $500,000+. This is a significant investment, but the content management scale and Adobe ecosystem integration deliver real value at enterprise scale.
Strengths
- DAM and Sites workflow keeps assets, pages, and components linked
- Adobe Analytics and Target integration connects publishing to performance data
- Multi-site and multi-language management from one platform
- Brand-aware generative AI accelerates on-brand content creation
Cautions
- Users report a steep learning curve with weeks of onboarding required
- Customers note that changes outside templates require developer involvement
Contentful
Contentful is a headless CMS that separates content storage from frontend presentation, delivering content via APIs to websites, apps, and any digital channel. It targets mid-market and enterprise teams that need to publish once and push everywhere. We think it’s a strong pick for teams already working in an API-first development model.
Contentful Key Features
The flexible API architecture lets frontend teams build whatever UI they want while Contentful feeds content without dictating design. The content modeling system gives teams real control over how data is structured and reused across channels. Reusable content modules reduce duplication significantly; build a block once for something like terms and conditions, then drop it into any page. Scheduled publishing queues timed content updates without manual intervention. Role-based access with SSO integration handles permissions at scale.
What Customers Say
Customers say the platform handles peak traffic without issues and the interface is quick to learn for day-to-day content work. Teams highlight the speed of dynamic updates, letting marketing push changes live without waiting for developer releases. Something to be aware of is that the visual editing experience is limited, making complex page navigation confusing for content teams. Initial setup also requires substantial technical expertise.
Our Take
We were impressed with the publishing speed and modular content approach. The free tier is generous enough to evaluate fit, with the Lite plan at $850/month and enterprise plans from $5,000 to $70,000+ per year. If your team needs API-first content flowing to multiple platforms with strong reusability, Contentful is well worth considering.
Strengths
- Reusable content modules eliminate repetitive writing across pages and channels
- API-first delivery lets frontend teams build custom UIs without CMS constraints
- Scheduled publishing queues timed updates without manual intervention
- Scales reliably during peak traffic without performance drops
Cautions
- Users note that visual editing is limited for complex page layouts
- Initial setup requires substantial technical expertise
Contentstack
Contentstack is a headless, API-first CMS built on MACH principles, targeting mid-size to enterprise teams that need modular content delivery across web, mobile, and apps. The block-based editing system and scheduled publishing are the standout workflow features. We think it fits organizations running high-volume content operations that value structured workflows.
Contentstack Key Features
The modular content modeling gives teams real speed. Build reusable components once, assemble pages from them, and push frequent updates without heavy developer involvement. Scheduled publishing with instant cache invalidation ensures updated content reflects immediately. Integrations with Jira, Figma, and Google Analytics connect content operations to your existing stack. Role-based access with granular permissions, SSO via SAML 2.0, and two-factor authentication handle the security layer. The MACH architecture gives long-term flexibility to swap other tools in and out.
What Customers Say
Customers say scheduling and daily content operations run smoothly once teams are up to speed. Support gets strong marks, with users highlighting feature requests being addressed within months. Teams migrating from other CMS platforms report faster content turnaround. Something to be aware of is that bulk editing requires opening entries individually, which slows high-volume content updates. The visual preview also doesn’t deliver the WYSIWYG experience editors expect.
Our Take
We think Contentstack is a strong option for e-commerce and finance teams needing structured workflows with precise release scheduling. Annual contracts typically range from $30,000 to over $200,000 depending on deployment size. If your team values modular content operations with strong governance controls, Contentstack is well worth considering.
Strengths
- Reusable modular components speed up page assembly and maintain consistency
- Scheduled publishing with instant cache invalidation ensures precise releases
- Responsive support team addresses feature requests quickly
- MACH architecture integrates cleanly with analytics and commerce tools
Cautions
- Bulk editing requires opening entries individually, slowing high-volume updates
- Reviews note that visual preview doesn't deliver the WYSIWYG experience editors expect
Drupal
Drupal is an open-source CMS built on PHP, used by government agencies, universities, and enterprises that need deep customization without vendor lock-in. Over 40,000 modules and 2,500 themes give it one of the largest extension ecosystems in the CMS market. We think it fits organizations with in-house development resources that want full control over their CMS.
Drupal Key Features
The modular architecture delivers serious flexibility. Most customization happens through contributed modules rather than writing code from scratch. Role-based access, automatic language translation, and multilingual content delivery come built into the core. The API layer supports headless delivery across channels. Drupal CMS 2.0, released in January 2026, introduced Drupal Canvas, a visual page-building interface with drag-and-drop components, live preview, and AI-powered tools including page generation from text prompts and admin chatbot assistance. Database encryption and granular permissions handle security requirements for government and finance teams.
What Customers Say
Customers say the community support and documentation are a major strength. Teams with years on the platform praise error diagnosis and maintainability. Once content workflows are configured, editors find day-to-day management intuitive. Something to be aware of is that complex page editing with nested modules can get confusing for content authors. There is also no recycle bin, meaning deleted content is unrecoverable without backup intervention.
Our Take
We think Drupal remains a strong choice for organizations that value open-source flexibility and have the PHP expertise to maintain it. The platform is free to use with zero licensing fees, though hosting and development resources carry their own costs. The Drupal CMS 2.0 update with Drupal Canvas and AI tools is a significant step forward for usability. If your team wants maximum control with no vendor lock-in, Drupal is well worth considering.
Strengths
- Over 40,000 modules enable deep customization without writing code from scratch
- Built-in multilingual support with automatic translation for global delivery
- Open-source licensing eliminates vendor lock-in and recurring platform fees
- Drupal CMS 2.0 adds visual page builder and AI-powered tools
Cautions
- Reviews note that complex page editing with nested modules confuses content authors
- No recycle bin means deleted content is unrecoverable without backups
HubSpot CMS Hub
HubSpot CMS Hub is a website and landing page builder tightly integrated with HubSpot’s CRM. It targets small to mid-sized marketing teams who want content creation with built-in lead tracking and personalization in one ecosystem. We think it’s the strongest option for teams already running marketing through HubSpot.
HubSpot CMS Hub Key Features
The drag-and-drop editor and template library get pages built fast without developer involvement. Content personalization pulls directly from CRM data, so you can tailor what visitors see based on their contact record. SEO recommendations surface during editing rather than as an afterthought. The real differentiator is the CRM connection; every page, form, and interaction feeds directly into contact records, deal tracking, and marketing workflows. This turns your website into a lead generation tool rather than just a content destination.
What Customers Say
Customers say the centralized setup simplifies content management, especially for teams already in the HubSpot ecosystem. Users highlight how content creation, analytics, and lead tracking live in one place rather than spread across tools. The built-in AI chat support gets praise for resolving questions quickly. Something to be aware of is that layout flexibility is limited; custom designs outside the template system require coding. The interface can also feel dense, with many options making simple actions take more steps than expected.
Our Take
We think HubSpot CMS Hub works best when your marketing stack already runs through HubSpot. The CRM integration is genuinely valuable for connecting content performance to lead generation. A free tier is available for basic site hosting and CRM, with Content Hub Starter at $450/month billed annually. If your priority is marketing-first content management with built-in lead tracking, it’s a strong solution to consider.
Strengths
- CRM integration connects content performance directly to lead generation
- SEO recommendations appear during content editing, not as a separate step
- Content personalization pulls directly from CRM contact records
- Built-in AI chat support resolves editing questions quickly
Cautions
- Reviews note layout flexibility is limited, with custom designs requiring coding
- Customers mention the dense interface makes simple actions take extra steps
Kontent.ai
Kontent.ai is a SaaS headless CMS delivering structured, modular content via RESTful API across any digital channel. It targets larger organizations that want clean content governance with developer flexibility and editor usability in one platform. We think it fits enterprises needing structured governance and clean API delivery.
Kontent.ai Key Features
The modular content model is the standout. Build structured, reusable blocks that feed into websites, apps, and internal portals through a single API. Content scheduling, editorial calendars, and asset management sit inside the platform. Real-time collaboration lets multiple editors work without stepping on each other. Developers pick their own frontend tools and Kontent.ai delivers content into them. SOC 2, ISO 27001, and ISO 27017 certifications cover the compliance side, with HIPAA support also available. The Web Spotlight feature provides visual in-context editing for non-technical users.
What Customers Say
Customers say implementation is quick and day-to-day editing is intuitive once content models are set up. Support gets consistently high marks for speed and responsiveness. Teams pulling modular content into internal portals highlight how easy it is to adjust for changing business needs. Something to be aware of is that the content modeling UI can feel constrained, making structural changes slower than expected. Large sites also become hard to navigate for new team members without strong naming discipline.
Our Take
We think Kontent.ai fits organizations building a composable tech stack where the CMS handles content and nothing else. The compliance certifications are among the broadest in the headless CMS space, which matters in regulated industries. Personalization capabilities are built in, though features like full DAM require separate tools. If your team values structured governance with clean API delivery, Kontent.ai is well worth considering.
Strengths
- Modular content blocks feed structured data to any channel through a single API
- Fast, responsive support team with consistently high marks
- SOC 2, ISO 27001, and ISO 27017 certifications with HIPAA support available
- Quick implementation with strong documentation and onboarding resources
Cautions
- Customers note the content modeling UI feels constrained for structural changes
- No built-in full DAM or advanced personalization engine requires additional tooling
Optimizely CMS
Optimizely CMS is an enterprise-grade content management system that bridges the gap between marketers who want visual editing control and developers who need headless architecture flexibility. It has evolved into a broader digital experience platform with AI-powered tools built in. We think it fits mid-to-large organizations that want marketers and developers working in the same platform.
Optimizely CMS Key Features
The visual builder with real-time preview is the key strength for marketing teams. Content editors customize pages using rich text and custom HTML without filing developer tickets. Reusable templates and an embedded DAM keep assets organized and page launches fast. On the developer side, integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics, and other enterprise tools connect cleanly. Multi-site support shares layouts across websites from a single codebase. Opal AI handles writing assistance, personalization, translations, and SEO guidance, with recent updates adding AI agents for content model creation and SEO optimization.
What Customers Say
Customers say the support stands out, with weekend availability and detailed ticket responses. Developers highlight the extensibility, noting custom functionality is straightforward to build. Content teams praise how easy it is to grant permissions and let non-technical staff manage their own pages. Something to be aware of is that version upgrades require framework migrations that slow adoption and carry risk. Developer documentation also has gaps, pushing teams to community forums for answers.
Our Take
We think Optimizely CMS delivers strong value for enterprises that need visual editing, AI tools, and headless delivery in one platform. Annual contracts typically range from $50,000 for smaller CMS deployments to $500,000+ for enterprise scale. Opal AI uses a credit-based usage model. If your organization has .NET expertise and wants both marketer and developer independence, Optimizely is well worth considering.
Strengths
- Visual editor lets content teams build and customize pages without developers
- Customer support responds quickly with detailed solutions, including weekends
- Multi-site support shares layouts across websites from one codebase
- Opal AI provides writing assistance, personalization, translations, and SEO guidance
Cautions
- Reviews note that version upgrades require framework migrations that carry risk
- Customers mention that developer documentation has gaps in some areas
WordPress
WordPress powers 43.5% of all websites, making it the most widely adopted CMS on the market. It is open-source and free to use, targeting everyone from solo bloggers to enterprise teams that want full control over their web presence. We think it remains the right choice for teams that want maximum control and customization with no vendor lock-in.
WordPress Key Features
The sheer scale of the ecosystem is the defining advantage. Over 61,000 free plugins and 30,000+ themes mean there is almost always an existing solution before you write custom code. The drag-and-drop editor with live preview handles basic page building, and role-based access permissions let you control who edits what. Because it’s open-source, developers can modify anything. That flexibility is the reason WordPress scales from simple blogs to complex enterprise sites, with over 590 million active sites currently running on the platform.
What Customers Say
Customers say the design customization freedom is the main draw. Full visibility into every element that builds a page gives site owners granular control. The depth of the platform means experienced users can execute complex site designs. The community documentation, tutorials, and developer support are extensive. Something to be aware of is that the learning curve is steep compared to managed site builders. Security also depends entirely on your configuration, plugin choices, and update discipline; 97% of WordPress security vulnerabilities originate in plugins and themes rather than core software.
Our Take
We think WordPress remains unmatched for flexibility and ecosystem depth. The platform is free to use with zero licensing fees, though hosting, premium plugins, and development resources carry their own costs. If your team has the technical capacity to maintain it and values complete control over your web presence, WordPress is the strongest option available.
Strengths
- Over 61,000 free plugins and 30,000+ themes cover nearly any feature need
- Open-source licensing means zero platform fees and complete code ownership
- Granular control over every page element for full design freedom
- Massive community with extensive documentation and developer support
Cautions
- Reviews note a steep learning curve compared to managed site builders
- Security depends entirely on configuration, plugin choices, and update discipline
Other Enterprise Technology Services
Comprehensive, cloud-native CMS that integrates seamlessly with Oracle's enterprise apps.
Visual web development platform that combines design, CMS, and hosting capabilities.
A cloud-based, headless CMS designed for mid-market and enterprise brands, facilitating rapid content deployment and management.
What To Look For: CMS Selection Checklist
Evaluating content management systems requires assessing both technical architecture and operational usability. Here’s what to prioritize:
- Authoring Experience for Your Team: Will your content editors find the interface intuitive or confusing? Can they make changes without developer involvement? Poor authoring UX kills adoption faster than missing features.
- API Flexibility and Headless Capability: Can your frontend team build custom experiences or is the CMS design-locked? Are APIs well documented and actively maintained? Headless capability matters even if you don’t use it initially.
- Content Reusability and Modeling: Can you build modular content that reuses across channels? Does the content model enforce consistency without creating bottlenecks? Duplicate content across pages signals poor CMS architecture.
- Integration Depth and Ecosystem: Does the CMS integrate with your existing tools or does it require workarounds? Can you connect your marketing stack, analytics, commerce, and personalization without custom code? Poor integration surfaces as constant operational friction.
- Multi-Site and Multi-Language Support: Can you manage multiple sites from one console? How does it handle content translation and localization? Managing sites separately signals architectural inefficiency.
- Performance and Scalability: How does the CMS handle peak traffic? Are page loads fast or slow? Can it scale with your content growth without performance degradation?
- Long-Term Support and Vendor Viability: Is the CMS actively developed with regular updates? Is vendor support responsive to real issues? Check third-party reviews for long-term satisfaction initial deployment experience differs from year-three operational reality.
Prioritize based on your team. Design agencies should emphasize visual design flexibility and multi-site management. API-first teams need headless architecture and modular content. Marketing organizations should prioritize analytics integration and campaign features. Enterprises need scalability and support depth.
How We Compared The Best Content Management Systems (CMS)
Expert Insights is an independent editorial team that researches, tests, and reviews cybersecurity and IT solutions. No vendor can pay to influence our review of their products. Our Editor’s Scores are based solely on product quality. Before testing, we map the full CMS landscape, identifying vendors across traditional, headless, and proprietary platform segments.
We evaluated nine platforms across authoring workflows, API capabilities, integration depth, multi-site management, performance, and operational ease of use. Each CMS was tested in realistic scenarios with multiple content types, localization requirements, and marketing integrations. We assessed both technical user experience for developers and end user experience for content teams managing daily publishing.
Beyond our evaluation, we conducted extensive market research and reviewed customer feedback to validate vendor claims against operational reality. We spoke with product teams on feature roadmaps and architectural decisions. Our editorial and commercial teams operate independently. No vendor can modify our assessments before publication.
This guide is updated quarterly. For full details on our evaluation process, visit our How We Test & Review Products.
The Bottom Line
The right CMS aligns with how your team actually works, not how you wish they worked. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize authoring simplicity, API flexibility, or design control.
If you want API-first architecture with modular content, Contentful delivers flexibility that frontend teams appreciate.
If your marketing stack runs through HubSpot, HubSpot CMS Hub connects content creation to lead generation without context switching. The template constraints matter, evaluate design customization needs carefully before committing.
If you’re an agency building client sites, Wix Studio CMS delivers dynamic pages and visual design tools that agencies and designers love. The client dashboard simplifies handoffs and long-term content updates.
If you want maximum flexibility and zero vendor lock-in, WordPress remains unmatched with 57,000 plugins and complete customization.
If you’re a large enterprise managing multiple brands globally, Adobe Experience Manager Sites justifies the licensing cost through content management scale and Adobe ecosystem integration. Plan for significant implementation investment.
Review the individual assessments above to evaluate learning curves, integration capabilities, and the authoring workflows that matter for your specific team.
FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Some of the key benefits of using a CMS to manage your web content include:
- Easy content creation without needing to know how to code
- Built-in SEO optimization
- Keeping cost down
- Built-in security features
- Easy collaboration and workflows
- 24/7 access and remote editing
- Content scheduling capabilities
- Easy integrations with existing tools and applications
- Community and developer support
In theory, yes. CMSs are designed to help anyone—whether they have deep technical knowledge, or not—to easily create and publish content. But the type of CMS that you invest in does factor into how easily you’ll be able to manage it.
If you choose a coupled CMS, then non-technical users—such as marketers and content editors—should have no issue with creating, modifying and publishing content without needing to engage developers. But if you go with a decoupled or headless CMS, then you’ll usually find that non-technical users can still easily create and manage content, but you’ll need a developer or two on hand to help with building and connecting to your frontend display.
To answer this question, we need to get a little more technical—so bear with us.
A website is generally built up of two core components. These are the frontend, which is the forward-facing part of your site that visitors will be able to see and interact with, and the backend, which is hidden from visitors and is where you can edit, store, and arrange content. The backend is also where your databases, APIs, servers, and operating systems live.
A coupled CMS, as the name suggests, is one that couples the frontend and backend together on one system. A decoupled CMS, on the other hand, separates the frontend and backend into two different systems which connect to each other via API. And a headless CMS lacks a frontend altogether, but can connect to any system on any channel via API.
You’ll often see the terms “decoupled” and “headless” used interchangeably—but they aren’t quite the same thing. Headless is actually a subset of decoupled. So, a headless CMS is always decoupled, but a decoupled CMS isn’t necessarily always headless.
As with all types of software, there are advantages and disadvantages to whichever CMS you end up choosing.
Coupled: Because the frontend and backend are wrapped up into one system, using this type of CMS will enable you to easily modify and manage how content looks on the frontend. But the main disadvantage is that it’s designed to deliver to web browsers, and so will struggle to convert content for omnichannel, multi-device viewing.
This type of CMS is great for more basic websites, or smaller organizations that don’t have a technical team to support the website.
Decoupled: Because the frontend and backend are decoupled, this type of CMS facilitates omnichannel delivery and allows a higher degree of flexibility. A decoupled CMS is also frontend agnostic but does come with a built-in frontend, which is optional to use. A key disadvantage is that this type of CMS is more complex to use and configure.
We recommend this type of CMS for growing websites that need a product that can scale alongside them and that have a developer or two on hand to support the platform.
Headless: Because this type of CMS doesn’t come with a frontend, content will exist in raw form on the backend. But what’s great about that is that it means it can be delivered to any channel or device via API. Key disadvantages of using a headless CMS are that you’ll need developer help as well as another system to act as your frontend. Headless CMS also often won’t allow live previews of content before it goes live, or personalization of the user experience.
Headless CMSs work best for organizations looking to deliver content across a range of channels—including apps and IoT devices—as opposed to creating complex websites. We’d recommend this type of CMS larger organizations that have a team of developers on side to support the project.
Every piece of software you come across is based on a source code. This essentially functions as instructions for an application or solution, telling it how to work and act. And, if you want a piece of software to behave differently, then making changes to the source code will do the trick.
An open source CMS is one that’s built on source code that’s not only free for anyone to use, but also free to modify and share. Open source software is popular because it often comes with a community of developers that contribute to the platform, and it’s also a lot more flexible in terms of the control you have over your website.
A proprietary/closed source CMS, on the other hand, means that the source code legally belongs to an organization or individual, can only be used under license, and can’t be modified or shared. Proprietary software is great if you’re looking for a stable, easy-to-use piece of software that’s under the responsibility of the provider to fix if anything goes wrong.
Written By
Joel is the Director of Content and a co-founder at Expert Insights; a rapidly growing media company focused on covering cybersecurity solutions.
He’s an experienced journalist and editor with 8 years’ experience covering the cybersecurity space. He’s reviewed hundreds of cybersecurity solutions, interviewed hundreds of industry experts and produced dozens of industry reports read by thousands of CISOs and security professionals in topics like IAM, MFA, zero trust, email security, DevSecOps and more.
He also hosts the Expert Insights Podcast and co-writes the weekly newsletter, Decrypted. Joel is driven to share his team’s expertise with cybersecurity leaders to help them create more secure business foundations.
Technical Review
Laura Iannini is a Cybersecurity Analyst at Expert Insights. With deep cybersecurity knowledge and strong research skills, she leads Expert Insights’ product testing team, conducting thorough tests of product features and in-depth industry analysis to ensure that Expert Insights’ product reviews are definitive and insightful.
Laura also carries out wider analysis of vendor landscapes and industry trends to inform Expert Insights’ enterprise cybersecurity buyers’ guides, covering topics such as security awareness training, cloud backup and recovery, email security, and network monitoring. Prior to working at Expert Insights, Laura worked as a Senior Information Security Engineer at Constant Edge, where she tested cybersecurity solutions, carried out product demos, and provided high-quality ongoing technical support.
Laura holds a Bachelor’s degree in Cybersecurity from the University of West Florida.