Best 9 Compliance Tracking Solutions For Business (2026)
We reviewed the leading compliance tracking solutions on framework breadth, control mapping quality, and how well each surfaces gaps before they become findings during an audit.
Written by
Mirren McDade
Technical Review by
Laura Iannini
Quick Summary
Compliance tracking solutions provide the structured workflows and reporting tools needed to monitor obligations across regulatory frameworks, track control status, and demonstrate ongoing compliance to auditors. Compliance programs that track obligations manually accumulate gaps that auditors find. We reviewed the top platforms and found Mitratech, AuditBoard, and Drata to be the strongest on framework breadth and gap identification before external audit.
Compliance is now continuous rather than periodic. Regulations change faster than your team can manually track them. Audit prep begins the day you finish the previous audit. The evidence you gather today proves tomorrow’s compliance, not yesterday’s.
The old spreadsheet-based approach to compliance tracking creates silos, duplicates effort, and ensures auditors always find undocumented gaps. Modern compliance requires visibility into what is actually happening across your environment, not what you remember documenting. That visibility only comes through platforms that automate evidence collection and surface compliance gaps in real time.
We evaluated nine compliance tracking solutions across different use cases from HR compliance to enterprise-wide GRC. We evaluated them for real-world deployment in diverse team sizes, automation quality, ease of ongoing management, and the critical measure: whether they reduce compliance burden or just create another tool that departments avoid using.
This guide gives you testing insights to choose the right tracking platform for your specific compliance needs, whether you are managing single frameworks, multiple certifications, or enterprise-wide risk and audit programs.
Our Recommendations
Your choice depends on whether you’re tracking regulatory updates, consolidating multi-framework testing, or automating evidence collection, and your audit complexity shapes implementation needs.
- Best For Regulatory Change Tracking: Mitratech HR Compliance Tracking helps HR and legal teams stay on top of regulatory change with real-time law alerts including specific action items.
- Best For Multi-Framework Shared Controls: AuditBoard pulls IT risk, compliance, and third-party risk management into one place where shared controls reduce duplicate testing.
- Best For Continuous Multi-Framework Automation: Drata automates compliance across SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR frameworks through continuous monitoring with shared controls reducing duplicate work.
- Best For Decentralized Multi-Framework Operations: Hyperproof centralizes compliance operations across multiple frameworks with AI automation and cross-framework control mapping.
- Best For Enterprise GRC Scale: IBM OpenPages unifies risk, compliance, audit, and policy management with AI-powered Watson integration for large organizations.
Mitratech HR Compliance Tracking helps HR and legal teams stay on top of regulatory change. It combines law monitoring, policy management, and expert guidance into one platform. If you are drowning in state and federal compliance updates, this is built for you.
Real-Time Alerts That Actually Matter
We found the Mineral Intelligence system delivers actionable alerts rather than noise. It monitors thousands of legislative changes and pushes notifications with specific next steps. You are not just told something changed. You get recommended actions.
The Compliance Dashboard surfaces deeper insights when you need them. Handbook management works well too. Side-by-side comparisons and one-click updates keep policies current without manual tracking. We saw this saves significant time for teams managing multi-state compliance.
What Teams Say About Day-to-Day Use
Customers praise how easy the platform is to pick up. Teams report quick onboarding and minimal friction across departments. Support response times get positive mentions consistently.
The custom platform builds come up often. Users appreciate that Mitratech configures the system to match their specific compliance requirements and ATS integrations. Issues typically get resolved within 24 hours. Resources and guidance are described as clear and accessible.
Right Fit for Growing Compliance Burdens
We think this works best for mid-size to large organizations with complex, multi-state compliance needs. If you only operate in one or two states, you will likely find more capability here than you need.
Strengths
- Real-time law alerts with specific action items reduce manual monitoring effort significantly
- Handbook updates happen automatically with side-by-side policy comparisons built in
- Expert HR and compliance guidance comes from certified professionals, not just software
- Custom platform configurations integrate directly with your existing ATS systems
Cautions
- Some customer reviews note that based on user feedback, smaller organizations with limited compliance scope may not need all available features
- Some users mention that initial setup and ongoing management require dedicated HR team attention
AuditBoard
AuditBoard is a GRC platform that pulls IT risk, compliance, and third-party risk management into one place. It targets enterprises juggling multiple frameworks who need shared controls and centralized visibility. If your team runs SOX alongside operational audits, this is squarely in your wheelhouse.
Centralized Control That Actually Reduces Workload
We found the platform does a solid job connecting compliance activities across frameworks. You manage gap assessments, evidence collection, and policy reviews without bouncing between systems. Automated evidence collection pulls recurring data from IT systems, which takes pressure off your stakeholders.
Continuous monitoring lets you set control baselines and alerts for real-time issue identification. The dashboard gives clear visibility into audit progress and status. We saw the workflow automation cuts down manual tracking significantly, especially when running multiple audits simultaneously.
Learning Curve Comes With the Territory
Customers consistently praise how the platform organizes evidence requests, testing, and follow-ups. Teams report spending less time chasing updates because status visibility is built in. The collaboration tools get positive marks for cross-team coordination.
That said, users flag a meaningful learning curve for new team members. Custom reporting takes extra steps to configure properly. Some customers mention navigation feels slower when datasets grow large. Template setup requires patience upfront.
Worth the Ramp-Up for Complex Environments
We think AuditBoard fits best in enterprises with mature compliance programs and multiple frameworks to manage. If you’re a smaller shop with straightforward audit needs, the complexity may outweigh the benefits.
Strengths
- Shared controls across frameworks reduce duplicate testing and accelerate compliance cycles
- Automated evidence collection pulls data directly from IT systems without chasing stakeholders
- Real-time dashboards show audit status clearly, eliminating manual progress tracking
- Centralized documentation with version control simplifies external auditor requests
Cautions
- According to customer feedback, New users face a steep learning curve before using full platform capabilities
- Based on customer reviews, Custom reporting requires additional configuration steps that feel less intuitive
Drata
Drata automates compliance across SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and other frameworks through continuous monitoring and evidence collection. It targets security teams tired of manual audit prep who want controls and risks visible in one console. If you are chasing multiple certifications, this platform earns its spot on your shortlist.
Automation That Actually Delivers
We found the automated evidence collection works well once integrations are configured. Connect your tech stack and Drata pulls compliance data directly from AWS, Google Workspace, Azure, and similar platforms. No more logging into separate systems to check status.
The control mapping across frameworks stands out. Tests shared between SOC 2 and ISO 27001 mean you are not duplicating effort. We saw the dashboard provides clear visibility into control health, test status, and gaps. Real-time monitoring catches drift before it becomes an audit finding.
What Customers Are Saying
Customers consistently praise the support team’s responsiveness and knowledge. Onboarding workshops help teams get productive quickly. The interface guides users through compliance work by linking controls, policies, and integrations together logically.
The integration library has gaps though.
Strong Fit for Multi-Framework Environments
We think Drata works best for organizations pursuing multiple certifications simultaneously. The shared controls and automated collection pay dividends at scale. Smaller teams with single-framework needs might find the system larger than necessary.
Strengths
- Automated evidence collection pulls directly from integrated platforms without manual effort
- Shared controls across frameworks reduce duplicate work when pursuing multiple certifications
- Real-time monitoring catches control drift before auditors find it during reviews
- Support team responds quickly with knowledgeable guidance during implementation and beyond
Cautions
- Some customer reviews highlight that integration gaps force manual evidence collection when your platform is not supported
- Some users have noted that asset management reporting lacks consolidated views with device identifiers like serial numbers
Hyperproof
Hyperproof centralizes compliance operations across multiple frameworks with AI-powered automation and cross-framework control mapping. It targets teams managing ISO 27001, SOC 2, and similar certifications who need evidence reuse and decentralized control ownership. If you are juggling audits across products, locations, or business entities, this fits the bill.
Cross-Framework Efficiency That Scales
We found the control mapping across frameworks works well in practice. Evidence linked to one control automatically satisfies requirements elsewhere, which cuts prep time significantly. The Labels feature lets you reuse documentation without duplicating effort.
Decentralized ownership stands out as a practical win. You can push control responsibility to individual functions instead of everything sitting with InfoSec. We saw this promotes better accountability and keeps compliance from becoming a bottleneck. Integrations with Jira, Slack, Google Drive, and Microsoft Teams keep workflows inside familiar tools.
Support Shines, Interface Needs Polish
Customers consistently highlight the support team as responsive and knowledgeable. Implementation guidance helps teams establish efficient processes from the start. The platform handles policy storage and approval workflows cleanly, giving auditors easy access to verify work.
That said, users flag the interface as heavy when managing large control sets. Navigation slows down noticeably with frequent use. Reporting and dashboard customization get called out as limited. Some advanced features require trial and error to understand, and the learning curve runs steeper than expected. Pricing also comes up as higher than alternatives.
Best for Complex Multi-Framework Programs
We think Hyperproof delivers the most value for enterprises managing compliance across multiple frameworks, locations, or product lines. Smaller teams with straightforward requirements may find the setup effort and cost harder to justify.
Strengths
- Evidence reuse across frameworks eliminates duplicate documentation work during audit prep
- Decentralized control ownership pushes accountability to business functions, not just InfoSec
- Integrations with Jira, Slack, and Google Drive keep compliance tasks inside familiar tools
- Support team responds quickly with knowledgeable guidance throughout implementation and use
Cautions
- According to some user reviews, Interface feels heavy and slows down when managing large numbers of controls
- Based on customer feedback, Dashboard and reporting customization options remain limited compared to user expectations
IBM OpenPages
IBM OpenPages is an enterprise-grade GRC platform that unifies risk, compliance, audit, and policy management with AI-powered insights through Watson integration. It targets large organizations with complex structures spanning multiple business units, alongside risk categories and regulatory frameworks. If you need a system that scales to tens of thousands of users across any cloud or on-premises, this is built for that.
Enterprise Scale With Long-Term Consistency
We found the platform handles complexity well. Multiple business units, overlapping frameworks, and varied risk categories do not create the patchwork feel you get with lighter tools. Once processes are defined and embedded, OpenPages becomes a reliable source of truth that holds up during audits.
The visibility into risk and compliance stands out. Dashboards translate technical risk data into terms leadership can actually understand. Watson integration delivers smart insights, risk predictions, and automation of repetitive compliance tasks. We saw the workflow customization gives teams real control over how processes run.
Powerful but Heavy
Customers praise how OpenPages forces discipline around risk assessments and remediation. The structured approach improves process adherence over time. Third-party and supplier risk management capabilities get positive mentions for protecting against data breaches.
That said, usability comes up repeatedly. The interface feels heavy and complex, especially for occasional users. Workflows take more clicks than necessary. Customizing fields, workflows, or reports requires admin support and careful planning. The UI looks dated compared to newer GRC tools. Cost also runs high, which customers note consistently.
Right Fit for Enterprise Complexity
We think OpenPages makes sense for large enterprises with mature GRC programs and the resources to implement properly. Smaller organizations or teams wanting quick deployment will likely find the learning curve and cost prohibitive.
Strengths
- Handles complex organizational structures across multiple business units and frameworks cleanly
- Watson AI integration provides risk predictions and automates repetitive compliance tasks
- Dashboards translate technical risk data into leadership-friendly language effectively
- Becomes a trusted source of truth that holds up well during audits and reviews
Cautions
- According to customer feedback, Interface feels heavy with workflows requiring more clicks than users expect necessary
- Some customer reviews highlight that customization requires admin support and careful planning, slowing response to change
MetricStream
MetricStream centralizes enterprise-wide GRC with an integrated risk management framework that connects process, risk, and control views across the organization and extended ecosystem. It targets large enterprises that need standardized risk frameworks, regulatory alignment, and third-party risk visibility in one platform. If you are managing cyber risk, alongside audit and business continuity alongside traditional GRC, this covers that ground.
Integrated Framework That Connects the Dots
We found the end-to-end process, risk, and control view stands out from competitors. The integrated framework links risk assessments to control effectiveness in ways that give you actual visibility rather than disconnected data points. Workflow automation allows some degree of customization for your specific processes.
The platform handles regulatory compliance tracking with features for regulation follow-up and assessment. Real-time cyber and IT risk intelligence delivers a unified view of threats and vulnerabilities. We saw the professional services team translates client needs effectively and applies them within implementable models.
Flexibility Comes With Complexity
Customers praise the clean interface and flexibility to meet business use cases through configuration. Support teams get called out as responsive and knowledgeable, using multi-channel engagement effectively. The product features compare favorably against peers in the market.
However, users flag a steep learning curve. Workflows run deep but are not always intuitive for newer team members. Bulk data uploads require excessive manual work in some cases. The per-app licensing model impacts costs when use cases span multiple modules. Integration build times with internal tools can drag out longer than expected. Certified MetricStream resources remain scarce in the marketplace.
Enterprise Play With Implementation Investment
We think MetricStream fits best for large enterprises ready to invest in proper implementation and ongoing expertise. Organizations wanting quick deployment or lacking dedicated GRC resources will find the complexity challenging.
Strengths
- Integrated risk framework connects process, risk, and control views across the enterprise effectively
- Flexible configuration adapts to specific business use cases without heavy custom development
- Professional services team translates requirements into implementable solutions competently
- Multi-channel support responds quickly and engages through appropriate communication methods
Cautions
- Some users have reported that per-app licensing increases costs when business use cases span multiple platform modules
- Some users report that learning curve runs steep with workflows that are not intuitive for newer users
NAVEX One
NAVEX One unifies risk and compliance management by connecting policy acknowledgements, training completion, incident reports, and third-party assessments into a single AI-powered platform. It targets organizations that need a 360-degree view of their risk environment rather than fragmented reports. If you are consolidating whistleblowing and training, plus third-party risk under one roof, this covers that scope.
Connected Data That Drives Decisions
We found the platform does a solid job linking compliance data across programs. You can see how policy modifications affect risk scores or how training efficacy influences incident trends. That connection between datasets provides actionable intelligence rather than isolated metrics.
Case management workflows work well, and the customizable table views let you see everything without clicking around. Initial setup surprised users with how straightforward it was. We saw the automation reduces manual effort across governance processes, which scales well for growing organizations.
Analytics Need Work, Search Frustrates
Customers appreciate the centralized approach and easy-to-follow content. Dashboards provide clear visibility into compliance status. The platform handles incident and case management workflows particularly well.
However, the analytics tools get consistent criticism. Report creation requires clicking through boxes rather than simple dropdown options. The search engine frustrates users badly. If you do not use the exact policy name, you will not find it. That is a real problem when you need documents quickly. Some users report system errors causing training sessions to fail. Performance slows with large data volumes. Pricing structure runs complex, making it a significant investment for mid-market organizations.
Strong for Holistic Risk Visibility
We think NAVEX One fits best for organizations ready to invest in a extensive GRC consolidation. Teams wanting lighter, more intuitive tools may find the learning curve and cost challenging.
Strengths
- Connects policy, training, incidents, and third-party data for genuine cross-program visibility
- Case management workflows handle incident tracking and whistleblowing processes effectively
- Customizable table views reduce clicking around to find critical information quickly
- Automation scales well as organizations grow without proportional manual effort increases
Cautions
- Some customer reviews note that search engine requires exact policy names, making quick document retrieval frustrating
- Some users mention that analytics and reporting tools need improvement with less intuitive report creation workflows
Resolver
Resolver centralizes risk management, incidents, and compliance with automated workflows, real-time regulatory tracking, and executive-ready dashboards. It targets teams juggling spreadsheets and disconnected tools who need structured accountability across audits and issue management. If your quarterly risk reviews feel chaotic, this platform brings that under control.
Structure That Replaces Spreadsheet Chaos
We found the platform enforces structure well across audits and issue management. Every issue, action item, and response gets clearly assigned, tracked, and documented. That accountability keeps things from falling through the cracks without constant manual follow-up.
The dashboards reflect real operational data, which makes leadership reviews more factual and less anecdotal. Graphical representations help visualize risk exposure clearly. We saw the workflow automation handles alerts and approvals efficiently, and the no-code setup lets you build processes for specific teams or regulators without developer resources.
Powerful but Not Day-One Ready
Customers praise how the platform replaced spreadsheets and disconnected tools, improving data accuracy significantly. Real-time reporting provides clear snapshots of open issues, severity levels, and remediation progress. Collaboration improves because everyone works from the same data and standardized processes.
That said, users consistently flag the learning curve. During the first few weeks, setting up workflows and reports takes more time than expected. Some configurations are not intuitive without guidance. Reporting customization requires patience to get right. Historical report tracing through search is not efficient. Deployment demands extra resources and time upfront.
Right Fit for Teams Ready to Invest in Setup
We think Resolver works best for organizations willing to invest in proper configuration. Teams wanting something fully functional on day one will find the ramp-up frustrating.
Strengths
- Enforces clear accountability with assigned ownership on every issue and action item
- Dashboards reflect real operational data, making leadership reviews factual and efficient
- No-code workflow builder adapts to specific teams, regions, or regulatory requirements
- Replaces spreadsheets and disconnected tools with centralized, standardized processes
Cautions
- Some users report that learning curve runs steep with workflows requiring guidance to configure properly
- According to customer feedback, Search capabilities for historical reports lack efficiency according to user feedback
ServiceNow GRC
ServiceNow GRC brings risk, compliance, audit, and business continuity onto the Now Platform, giving you a single environment if you are already running ServiceNow for IT operations. It targets medium to large enterprises that want integrated workflows across departments rather than standalone GRC tools. If platform consolidation matters to your organization, this deserves consideration.
Single Platform Advantage
We found the integration story stands out. Risk management connects directly to your existing ServiceNow environment, which eliminates the data silos that plague multi-tool setups. Real-time monitoring and reporting reduce manual tasks and automate processes that would otherwise eat up analyst time.
Dashboards work well at department level for risk mitigation, capacity management, and compliance tracking. The audit reporting capabilities get praised for transparency. We saw the customizable dashboards and reporting come ready out of the box, and tailoring questions and flows proves relatively straightforward once you understand the system.
What Customers Are Saying
Customers appreciate ticket tracking and the ability to assign tasks with clear accountability. External application integration works smoothly. The product capabilities themselves get consistently positive marks.
However, navigation frustrates users repeatedly.
Best When You’re Already on ServiceNow
We think ServiceNow GRC makes the most sense for organizations already invested in the Now Platform. The single-platform benefit compounds when you’re consolidating rather than adding another vendor.
Strengths
- Single platform with existing ServiceNow environment eliminates data silos across tools
- Real-time monitoring and reporting automates manual compliance and risk tracking tasks
- Customizable dashboards come ready out of the box with straightforward tailoring options
- External application integration connects GRC data to your broader technology ecosystem
Cautions
- Some customer reviews flag that navigation and form workflows confuse end users without dedicated administrator support
- Based on customer reviews, Initial deployment requires significant effort to stand up and configure properly
Other Compliance Tracking Solutions to consider include:
Gain enterprise visibility into risk, enabling informed decisions that drive your organization’s progress.
Monitor and prove adherence to applicable EHS regulatory requirements, both locally and globally.
What To Look For: Compliance Tracking Checklist
When evaluating compliance tracking solutions, we have identified eight essential criteria. Here is the checklist of questions you should be asking:
- Evidence Automation: Does it automatically collect evidence from your tech stack, or will you manually gather screenshots? Does it integrate with your critical systems? What is the integration library size? Will you need custom API work?
- Multi-Framework Support: Does it map multiple frameworks you actually pursue? Does it show shared controls across standards? Will adding another certification later require rework, or can you layer on new frameworks without disruption?
- Real-Time Visibility: Can you see compliance gaps in real time? Does it alert you when configuration drift happens? Or do you only discover problems during audit prep?
- Team Structure Flexibility: Can you distribute control ownership across departments, or does everything centralize in one team? Will decentralization help adoption, or create silos? What does collaboration look like across teams?
- Audit Readiness: Does it generate auditor-ready reports automatically? Can you share evidence securely without PDF handoffs? What does external auditor access look like?
- User Adoption And Overhead: Will your teams actually use it, or will it become another tool they avoid? Does it fit into existing workflows, or require everyone to change how they work? How much admin time does it need to stay current?
- Configuration And Customization: Can you tailor it to your specific requirements, or are you locked into templates? If your compliance needs are non-standard, what is the path forward?
- Scalability And Cost: Does pricing scale reasonably as you add frameworks, users, or integrations? Or does the bill grow faster than expected? What is your total cost through first audit and ongoing maintenance?
Weight these criteria based on your current state. Teams starting compliance tracking should prioritize automation and ease of adoption. Enterprises with mature programs should focus on multi-framework integration and real-time visibility. Organizations juggling multiple audits simultaneously need workflow automation and shared control definitions. If you lack in-house GRC expertise, choose something with strong onboarding and responsive support.
How We Compared The Best Compliance Tracking Solutions
Expert Insights is an independent editorial team that researches, tests, and reviews cybersecurity and IT solutions. No vendor can pay to influence our review of their products. Our assessments are based solely on product quality and operational effectiveness.
We evaluated nine compliance tracking solutions across different team sizes and compliance scenarios. Testing included automation quality, integration range, multi-framework handling, ease of ongoing management, and most critically, whether they reduce compliance burden or just create another tool departments avoid. We assessed each solution’s capability to provide real-time compliance visibility and generate auditor-ready evidence without constant manual work.
Beyond hands-on testing, we reviewed customer feedback from both early-stage compliance programs and mature enterprises managing multiple frameworks. We analyzed feedback on implementation timelines, adoption friction, and long-term value realization. Our testing prioritizes operational effectiveness and actual compliance outcomes over feature count.
This guide is updated quarterly. For complete details on our evaluation methodology, visit our How We Test & Review Products.
The Bottom Line
Compliance tracking is not one size fits all. Your scope, team structure, and current maturity determine which solution makes sense.
If you are pursuing multiple security frameworks simultaneously, Drata excels at automated evidence collection and shared controls across SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR.
If you want to distribute compliance ownership across business functions, Hyperproof enables decentralized control ownership with evidence reuse across frameworks. Support quality stands out.
For HR and employment compliance challenges, Mitratech monitors thousands of regulatory changes with actionable next steps rather than just alerts. Custom integrations mean it adapts to your specific ATS and systems.
For enterprises replacing spreadsheets with structured oversight, Resolver enforces accountability with no-code workflow builders. Plan for a setup investment before seeing full value.
For organizations already on ServiceNow wanting single-platform consolidation, ServiceNow GRC integrates directly with your existing environment. For teams without ServiceNow infrastructure, the implementation effort may not justify the platform choice.
Read the individual reviews above to dig into automation capabilities, integration depth, and the operational model that fits your specific compliance needs.
FAQs
Compliance Tracking Software Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Compliance tracking software continuously monitors your organization’s systems, policies, and processes to verify that they meet regulatory and internal compliance requirements. It automates the collection, assessment, and analysis of compliance data, alerting teams when controls fall out of alignment or risks emerge. By maintaining real-time visibility into compliance status and generating detailed audit trails, it enables organizations to quickly address issues and demonstrate adherence to laws, standards, and frameworks.
Manual compliance processes are slow, error-prone, and provide only periodic snapshots of security posture. Compliance tracking software automates this process, ensuring that controls remain effective between audits and that misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, or unauthorized actions are identified early. This continuous oversight reduces the risk of fines, breaches, and compliance failures; helping organizations maintain operational integrity and data protection without overburdening staff.
Look for solutions that offer strong automation, regulatory tracking to keep pace with changing requirements, and real-time reporting for visibility across your environment. Centralized policy and document management, robust audit trails, and integration with existing IT or security systems are key for efficiency. Scalability, user-friendly dashboards, and the ability to adapt to new frameworks ensure the platform supports your compliance needs as your organization grows.
Compliance tracking strengthens your security posture by identifying and addressing configuration gaps before they lead to incidents. It helps you comply with key regulations such as HIPAA, PCI DSS, and FERPA, while reducing the risk of data leaks, breaches, and financial penalties. Beyond compliance, it supports business continuity by protecting critical assets, maintaining customer trust, and ensuring that executives have visibility and control over compliance and risk management programs.
Written By
Mirren McDade is a senior writer and journalist at Expert Insights, spending each day researching, writing, editing and publishing content, covering a variety of topics and solutions, and interviewing industry experts.
She is an experienced copywriter with a background in a range of industries, including cloud business technologies, cloud security, information security and cyber security, and has conducted interviews with several industry experts.
Mirren holds a First Class Honors degree in English from Edinburgh Napier University.
Technical Review
Laura Iannini is a Cybersecurity Analyst at Expert Insights. With deep cybersecurity knowledge and strong research skills, she leads Expert Insights’ product testing team, conducting thorough tests of product features and in-depth industry analysis to ensure that Expert Insights’ product reviews are definitive and insightful.
Laura also carries out wider analysis of vendor landscapes and industry trends to inform Expert Insights’ enterprise cybersecurity buyers’ guides, covering topics such as security awareness training, cloud backup and recovery, email security, and network monitoring. Prior to working at Expert Insights, Laura worked as a Senior Information Security Engineer at Constant Edge, where she tested cybersecurity solutions, carried out product demos, and provided high-quality ongoing technical support.
Laura holds a Bachelor’s degree in Cybersecurity from the University of West Florida.