Best 11 eDiscovery Software Solutions For Business (2026)
We reviewed 11 eDiscovery platforms on the speed and accuracy of custodian searches, the quality of legal hold workflows, and how well each handles large data volumes without sacrificing search precision.
Written by
Caitlin Harris
Technical Review by
Laura Iannini
eDiscovery software helps legal teams collect, preserve, and produce electronically stored information in response to litigation or regulatory investigation. eDiscovery requests carry legal and financial consequences for delays. We reviewed 11 platforms and found Mitratech LegalHold, CloudNine, and Digital WarRoom to be the strongest on custodian search accuracy and legal hold workflow quality.
eDiscovery has become a standard operational process. Litigation, regulatory investigations, audits, and records management all require the ability to find, collect, and process relevant data quickly and defensibly. But the eDiscovery landscape is fragmented between enterprise platforms requiring significant implementation, point solutions solving single problems, and consumer-grade tools that fail under volume.
The real problem isn’t finding an eDiscovery tool; it’s finding one that fits your matter volume, data sources, budget, and regulatory requirements. You need something that processes diverse data types without special pleading from IT, that maintains defensibility without becoming a compliance nightmare, and that costs appropriately for your organization size. Get it wrong and you either overspend on enterprise infrastructure you don’t need or use a tool too limited for your actual data volumes.
We evaluated multiple eDiscovery solutions across legal hold automation, data collection and processing, search and tagging, analytics, and reporting. We evaluated each for ease of use without deep technical expertise, range of data source support, and real-world handling of litigation volumes. We also reviewed customer feedback to understand where vendor claims about processing speed and defensibility hold up.
This guide gives you the testing insights and decision framework to match the right eDiscovery platform to your matter volume, data landscape, and operational constraints.
What is GRC And Compliance?
eDiscovery software helps legal teams find, collect, preserve, and produce electronic documents and communications when litigation or regulatory investigations require it. When your organization receives a legal hold or discovery request, you need to identify relevant emails, files, chat messages, and other data, preserve them so nothing gets deleted, review them for relevance and privilege, and produce them in the format opposing counsel or regulators require. eDiscovery platforms automate this process, replacing the manual work of searching through servers and inboxes with indexed, searchable repositories that maintain the chain of custody auditors and courts demand.
eDiscovery platforms follow the Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) across six functional stages: identification, preservation, collection, processing, review, and production. The identification stage maps custodians to data sources and scopes potentially relevant ESI. The preservation stage implements legal holds with automated notices, reminders, escalation workflows, and integration with email and collaboration systems to prevent spoliation. The collection stage ingests data from diverse sources including email servers, cloud storage, chat platforms, and mobile devices while maintaining forensic defensibility. The processing stage deduplicates, indexes, and OCRs collected data into searchable formats. The review stage provides search, tagging, coding, and analytics tools including AI-powered predictive coding, concept clustering, and technology-assisted review (TAR) to reduce manual document review. The production stage exports reviewed documents in litigation-ready formats with Bates numbering, redactions, and privilege logs. Advanced platforms add continuous attack surface monitoring for preservation, AI agents that automate review workflows, and cross-matter analytics that identify patterns across cases.
eDiscovery Solutions Compared
Here is a comparison of the eDiscovery platforms reviewed in this article.
| Product | Best For | Type | AI-Powered Review | Legal Hold | On-Premises Option | Multi-Source Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mitratech LegalHold
|
Automating legal hold workflows
|
Legal Hold + eDiscovery
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
CloudNine
|
Diverse data type processing
|
Full eDiscovery
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Digital WarRoom
|
SMBs wanting transparent pricing
|
Full eDiscovery
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
DISCO eDiscovery
|
AI-accelerated document review
|
Full eDiscovery
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Everlaw
|
Large-scale complex litigation
|
Full eDiscovery
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Exterro eDiscovery
|
Enterprise Legal GRC workflows
|
Legal GRC + eDiscovery
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Logikcull
|
Fast onboarding for SMBs
|
Full eDiscovery
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Nextpoint
|
Mid-sized firms with predictable pricing
|
Full eDiscovery
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
RelativityOne
|
Enterprise-scale complex matters
|
Full eDiscovery
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
ComplyKEY
|
Tamper-proof archiving + eDiscovery
|
Archive + eDiscovery
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Intradyn
|
Archiving with real-time eDiscovery
|
Archive + eDiscovery
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
How We Tested
We evaluated 11 ediscovery platforms, assessing each through hands-on testing, customer feedback analysis, and market research. This guide was written by Caitlin Harris and technically reviewed by Laura Iannini. Read our full methodology
Mitratech
Best for mid-size to large organizations facing frequent litigation or regulatory scrutiny
Mitratech LegalHold is a cloud-based solution designed to streamline the end-to-end legal hold process for corporate legal departments. The platform centralizes and automates legal hold workflows, making it easier for teams to manage obligations consistently and defensibly.
- Integrates with Active Directory and HR platforms to identify and engage custodians using up-to-date employee data
- Automates hold notices, reminders, and escalations to improve custodian compliance without overloading legal staff
- Reporting capabilities help legal teams monitor hold status and demonstrate defensibility under judicial review
- Integrates with TeamConnect and eCounsel for unified matter management
- Mobile-friendly interface supports attestation completion from any device
We think LegalHold is a strong fit for mid-size to large organizations facing frequent litigation or regulatory scrutiny. The automation features reduce manual workload significantly, making it well suited for legal departments seeking to scale operations without expanding headcount.
Strengths
Cautions
CloudNine
CloudNine
Best for organizations with regular eDiscovery needs dealing with diverse data types across matters
CloudNine is an eDiscovery platform for legal teams handling litigation and audits, with both cloud and on-premises deployment options. We think the data format coverage is the key strength here; the platform processes financial records, forensic artifacts, SMS, collaboration app messages, geolocation data, and social media posts without requiring special connectors or custom development. If you’re dealing with diverse data types across multiple sources, that flexibility matters.
- Automatically ingests and processes uploaded data into searchable formats with OCR handling images
- Microsoft 365 and OneDrive integrations speed up collection with contextual information preserved
- Document tagging is flexible and intuitive with search tools for quick relevant data isolation
- LAW module carries NIST 800-53 Rev 4 certification with audit logs tracking every user action
Users consistently praise the learning curve; teams get productive fast, often with minimal training. Customer service gets strong marks for responsiveness and technical knowledge. Something to be aware of is that advanced analytics features feel less mature than what enterprise-focused competitors offer, and bulk operations can slow when handling very large datasets.
We think CloudNine fits organizations with regular eDiscovery needs who deal with diverse data types across their matters. The automation and format flexibility pay off for teams handling frequent audits or litigation. The platform scales well for mid-market and larger legal departments, and the recent integration with Mitratech LegalHold creates a strong end-to-end workflow from preservation through production.
Strengths
Cautions
Digital WarRoom
Digital WarRoom
Best for small to mid-size firms handling their own eDiscovery without enterprise pricing
Digital WarRoom is an eDiscovery platform for law firms and corporate legal teams who want control over their data without enterprise pricing. We think the transparent pricing is the standout here; single matter subscriptions start with predictable monthly costs and per-GB hosting with no processing fees, no setup fees, and no hidden charges. Both on-premises and cloud deployment are available, and firms working with terabyte-scale libraries can avoid runaway cloud fees by hosting locally.
- Automatically processes all uploaded data and metadata with every word indexed and OCR handling images
- Visual email mapping with heatmaps shows communication frequency between parties with chain visualization
- Privilege log entries generate automatically for sensitive documents with redaction tools and custom annotations
- Deduplication reduces storage costs on large matters with drag-and-drop interface for non-specialists
Users praise the cost structure; one team processed over 200 GB of email and culled it down for $250. Support gets high marks for responsiveness and training quality. Something to be aware of is that some interface features are not immediately discoverable without training or support. The subscription renewal process can also be clunky, and OCR occasionally struggles with certain file types.
We think Digital WarRoom works best for small to mid-size firms handling their own eDiscovery who need strong capabilities without enterprise pricing. The on-premises option is a genuine advantage for firms with large data volumes who want to avoid ongoing hosting fees. Larger organizations with dedicated litigation support vendors may prefer more specialized tools.
Strengths
Cautions
DISCO eDiscovery
DISCO
Best for organizations prioritizing speed and AI assistance in document review
DISCO is a cloud-based eDiscovery platform built around AI-powered document review. We think the AI capabilities are the clear differentiator; the platform uses AI to prioritize documents based on contextual tags, flag inconsistently coded data, and surface similar related documents. In February 2026, DISCO launched an all-inclusive platform combining eDiscovery, its Cecilia AI assistant, deposition management, and timelines into a single offering at no additional charge.
- Cecilia AI generates document summaries and timelines with automatic source citations for verification
- Cecilia Auto Review processes approximately 25,000 documents per hour
- Cecilia Q&A lets users ask questions about documents in conversational language with answers in seconds
- Auto-tagging capabilities cut significant time from the initial review phase with support for eight languages
Users consistently highlight the interface as intuitive and responsive. Teams that switched mid-litigation from other platforms report major performance improvements. Support gets strong marks for availability, and DISCO University provides solid training resources. Something to be aware of is that Bates range searching could be more intuitive for some workflows, and document version handling gets complicated when the same file arrives from multiple sources.
We think DISCO fits organizations prioritizing speed and AI assistance in document review. If your team lacks dedicated eDiscovery specialists, the learning curve is forgiving, and the Cecilia AI capabilities genuinely reduce manual review time. Firms needing highly customized workflows or complex production controls may want more configurable options.
Strengths
Cautions
Everlaw
Everlaw
Best for legal teams managing complex, high-volume matters where analytics and collaboration pay for themselves
Everlaw is an eDiscovery platform built for large-scale litigation and complex multi-party matters. We think the analytics and machine learning capabilities are the key differentiators; the platform identifies potentially responsive documents automatically and clusters similar documents without requiring manual tagging. Everlaw processes up to 1 million documents per hour, which matters when you’re racing a discovery deadline with terabytes of data.
- Concept search finds responsive material beyond traditional keyword searches
- Collaborative workspace lets multiple reviewers work simultaneously without conflicts
- EverlawAI provides near-instant document insights, summaries, and answers with direct citations
- Translation tools detect over 135 languages and transcribe media files automatically
Users praise the platform as intuitive with strong analytics. Customer service gets consistently high marks for responsiveness, and training materials are extensive. Something to be aware of is that implementation requires significant resources and upfront effort to get full value from the platform’s capabilities. Pricing is substantial, requiring significant matter volume to justify the investment.
We think Everlaw fits legal teams managing complex, high-volume matters where the analytics and collaboration features pay for themselves. The concept search and machine learning for responsive document identification are genuinely useful for large document sets. If your matters are smaller or more straightforward, the platform may be more than you need.
Strengths
Cautions
Exterro eDiscovery
Exterro
Best for larger enterprises needing unified workflows across the entire eDiscovery lifecycle
Exterro offers an eDiscovery suite within a broader Legal GRC platform, targeting larger enterprises that need unified workflows across preservation, collection, processing, review, and production. We think the workflow orchestration is the standout feature; the platform automatically identifies critical electronically stored information before collection starts, which speeds up Early Case Assessment when you need to scope a matter quickly.
- AI-powered workflows defensibly issue, track, and enforce legal holds with automated notifications and full audit trails
- Integrations with Microsoft 365, email systems, and archiving tools prevent accidental data deletion during holds
- Custodian relationship visualization highlights communication patterns and key trends
- Contextual label suggestions analyze content and previous labeling decisions to recommend tags
Users praise the customizable layout and overall usability once they learn the system. Long-term users describe it as a useful tool for managing large holds through to production. Something to be aware of is that the learning curve is steep, and initial training support can be difficult to access. Reporting tools are also confusing to navigate for some users during the initial onboarding period.
We think Exterro fits organizations with established legal operations teams who need unified workflows across the entire eDiscovery lifecycle. The Legal GRC platform approach means you’re getting eDiscovery alongside privacy, data governance, and risk management capabilities, which adds value if you need that broader scope. Smaller teams without dedicated eDiscovery staff may struggle with the initial ramp-up.
Strengths
Cautions
Logikcull eDiscovery
Logikcull (Reveal)
Best for SMBs, government agencies, and small to mid-sized law firms wanting fast onboarding
Logikcull is a cloud-based eDiscovery platform built for accessibility, targeting SMBs, government agencies, educational institutions, and small to mid-sized law firms. We think the fast onboarding is the key strength here; the interface is intuitive enough that reviewers under tight deadlines can teach themselves the basics without formal training. The platform is now part of the Reveal family, though it continues to operate as a standalone product for straightforward matters.
- Drag-and-drop imports with native integrations for Microsoft 365, Google Vault, Slack, and Box
- Automatic indexing, deduplication, and pre-defined search filters cover common needs including PII detection
- Bulk redactions, privilege tagging, similar document detection, and email threading run automatically
- Legal hold management includes automatic notices, reminders, and tracking with encryption and MFA
Users consistently praise usability and platform speed, with 24/7 chat support available. Teams handling millions of documents report reliable performance without crashes. Something to be aware of is that deduplication occasionally flags non-duplicate PDFs, requiring manual verification. Bates numbering limitations also affect single PDF exports and in-platform searching.
We think Logikcull fits organizations that value simplicity over advanced customization. If your team needs fast ramp-up and straightforward workflows for day-to-day matters, the platform delivers. Power users needing granular production controls or complex integrations should verify those features during evaluation.
Strengths
Cautions
Nextpoint
Nextpoint
Best for small to mid-sized firms and government agencies wanting unlimited data hosting with predictable pricing
Nextpoint is a cloud-based eDiscovery and trial preparation platform targeting small to mid-sized firms and government agencies. We think the unlimited data hosting with per-user pricing is the standout here; it makes costs predictable regardless of matter size, which is a genuine advantage for firms that can’t predict data volumes upfront. The platform handles document review, production, and case preparation in one system.
- Drag-and-drop data imports with automatic deduplication and OCR indexing on upload
- Customizable coding system lets users create their own views, tags, and bulk actions without affecting other reviewers
- Search flexibility builds searches by tags and coding during review with syntax search builder for complex queries
- Complete audit trails track access, views, edits, and deletions at case, folder, and document levels
Users praise the balance between functionality and ease of use. Customer support gets consistently high marks for responsiveness and hands-on help. Teams report the platform handles unusual file formats well, which is particularly useful for IP cases. Something to be aware of is that document preview shows only the first page, requiring extra clicks to browse longer files. Some routine tasks also require multiple steps without macro or shortcut options.
We think Nextpoint works well for firms managing matters in the gigabyte range rather than terabytes. If your team values self-service production without vendor delays, the workflow delivers. The unlimited data hosting removes the cost uncertainty that makes other platforms difficult to budget for. Larger organizations processing massive volumes may need more automation.
Strengths
Cautions
RelativityOne
Relativity
Best for organizations with complex, high-volume matters and the resources to invest in training
RelativityOne is the industry standard for large-scale eDiscovery, serving over 300,000 users across corporate legal teams, law firms, and government agencies. We think the customization depth and ecosystem are the key strengths; the Relativity App Hub extends functionality through custom and developer-built applications, and the platform supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployment options. If your team already knows Relativity, the ecosystem advantages compound over time.
- Direct integrations pull data from Microsoft 365, Slack, and Google Workspace
- Communication visualization displays emails, texts, and instant messages in their original app format
- AI-powered review with aiR for Review and aiR for Privilege updated to run 3x faster
- Translation covers over 100 languages with FedRAMP certification for RelativityOne Government
Users praise customer service responsiveness and the depth of customization options. Teams processing large data sets report the platform handles internal investigations and compliance operations effectively. Something to be aware of is that the learning curve remains steep; training new users takes significant time. Despite ongoing updates, the interface can feel dated compared to newer competitors in the space.
We think RelativityOne fits organizations with complex, high-volume matters and the resources to invest in training. The ecosystem advantages are real for teams already using Relativity, and the compliance certifications covering ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, and FedRAMP make it suitable for regulated and government work. Smaller firms or teams seeking faster onboarding may find lighter platforms more practical.
Strengths
Cautions
Waterford Technologies ComplyKEY
Waterford Technologies
Best for organizations where audit defensibility and regulatory compliance drive eDiscovery requirements
ComplyKEY is a data management and compliance platform from Waterford Technologies, serving IT, legal, and governance teams who need to preserve, search, and export data for eDiscovery, litigation, and regulatory compliance. We think the tamper-proof archive is the standout feature; records are admissible as court evidence with complete audit trails logging all activities on each record, which positions it well for organizations where defensibility is the primary requirement.
- Search supports Boolean, proximity, and fuzzy logic alongside regular expressions, searching millions of archived emails in seconds
- Search filtering lets admins hide tagged content from results for excluding sensitive data like credit card information
- Flexible retention policies allow different periods for specific user groups or data types
- Handles GDPR data subject access requests, freedom of information requests, and PCI-DSS, HIPAA compliance
Long-term users praise reliability; some have run the platform for over a decade across multiple organizations. Support queries get handled efficiently, and the interface is intuitive for eDiscovery once users learn it. Something to be aware of is that folder structures from mailboxes don’t carry through to search results, which can complicate certain workflows. Infrequent users also find it harder to maintain proficiency with the platform between uses.
We think ComplyKEY fits organizations where audit defensibility and regulatory compliance drive requirements. If your primary need is email archiving with strong search and legal hold capabilities, the platform delivers. Teams focused primarily on litigation review with diverse data types may want broader eDiscovery tooling.
Strengths
Cautions
Intradyn
Intradyn
Best for organizations needing archiving alongside eDiscovery for North American regulatory requirements
Intradyn combines digital archiving and eDiscovery in a single platform with unlimited storage. We think the real-time archiving is the key strength; emails become searchable within seconds of arrival, and the platform covers email, SMS, Microsoft Teams, and social media all flowing into one searchable repository. If you need archiving alongside eDiscovery for North American regulatory requirements, Intradyn covers both without requiring separate tools.
- Unlimited AWS storage with no caps, simplifying capacity planning for growing organizations
- Crawler tool ingests historical email databases and PST files for migrations
- Search tool supports over 100 languages with granular parameters and saved recurring searches
- Outlook integration lets end users run searches directly without switching interfaces
- Compliance features include automated legal hold, customizable retention policies, and immutable audit log
Users consistently describe the platform as reliable, with one organization reporting over a decade of consistent performance. IT teams praise the low support burden; the product works without frequent intervention. Setup is straightforward, and the search interface gets strong marks for being both powerful and intuitive. No significant complaints surfaced in customer feedback for this product.
We think Intradyn fits organizations prioritizing archiving alongside eDiscovery, particularly those with North American compliance requirements. The unlimited AWS storage removes capacity planning concerns entirely, and the real-time archiving means you’re never waiting for data to become searchable. Global organizations with complex international requirements should verify coverage for their specific jurisdictions.
Strengths
Cautions
eDiscovery Pricing
eDiscovery pricing varies significantly by platform type, matter volume, and deployment model. Some platforms offer transparent per-GB or per-user pricing, while enterprise solutions are quote-based. Smaller firms benefit from platforms with predictable cost structures.
| Product | Starting Price | Billing | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mitratech LegalHold
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
CloudNine
|
Contact for quote
|
Per matter or annual
|
|
|
Digital WarRoom
|
From $250/month per matter
|
Monthly
|
|
|
DISCO eDiscovery
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
Everlaw
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
Exterro eDiscovery
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
Logikcull
|
Contact for quote (usage-based)
|
Per matter
|
|
|
Nextpoint
|
Contact for quote (per-user, unlimited data)
|
Annual
|
|
|
RelativityOne
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
ComplyKEY
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
Intradyn
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
eDiscovery Checklist
These are the configuration and operational steps we recommend when deploying eDiscovery software.
Understanding which systems hold potentially relevant data, including email, chat, cloud storage, and mobile devices, determines which platforms can collect from your environment without custom development.
Legal holds that fail to preserve relevant data expose your organization to spoliation sanctions; testing the full workflow before a real hold request prevents procedural mistakes.
Manual custodian identification is slow and error-prone; automated integration ensures departing employees and role changes are reflected in active holds.
Courts require evidence that collected data has not been altered; confirming your platform logs every access, export, and modification protects against spoliation challenges.
Search speed degrades on some platforms as data volumes grow; testing with representative matter sizes prevents surprises during time-sensitive litigation deadlines.
Privileged documents and confidential data require access restrictions; granular permissions ensure reviewers see only what their role requires.
Courts and opposing counsel have specific format requirements; configuring templates for Bates numbering, redaction, and export formats early prevents production delays.
eDiscovery tools used under litigation pressure for the first time produce mistakes; training both sides of the workflow before a real matter reduces risk.
AI review tools deliver the strongest ROI on large document sets; smaller matters may not benefit enough to justify the additional cost or configuration.
Retention policies that conflict with litigation holds create legal risk; documenting both workflows ensures your organization preserves what it must and disposes of what it can.
The Bottom Line
The right eDiscovery platform depends on your matter volume, data complexity, budget, and whether you need integrated legal hold capabilities.
If you’re managing multiple active legal matters with frequent holds, Mitratech LegalHold automates the lifecycle with automation that significantly reduces manual effort. The platform integrates with your existing legal technology stack.
For processing diverse data types from multiple sources, CloudNine handles financial records, chat systems, and collaboration platforms without special connectors. The flexible deployment supports both cloud and on-premises requirements.
For cost-conscious teams handling smaller matters, Logikcull delivers powerful processing with transparent, usage-based pricing.
For large-scale litigation with complex team structures, Everlaw provides sophisticated analytics and collaborative review workflows that scale across thousands of documents.
For regulated environments requiring forensic rigor, Exterro eDiscovery provides orchestrated eDiscovery workflows with preservation integrations and visualization tools for complex matter management.
Read the individual reviews above to understand processing capabilities, collaboration features, and the trade-offs that matter for your specific litigation profile.
Everything You Need To Know About eDiscovery Software (FAQs)
eDiscovery is the process of obtaining electronically stored information (ESI)—such as digital documents, emails, social media posts, and webpages—usually for compliance or litigation purposes. However, some organizations may use eDiscovery tools as a means to securely archive and easily search for sensitive data, such as protected health information (PHI).
The key stages of the eDiscovery process are:
- Identifying your data sources.
- Preserving your data against tampering or deletion.
- Collecting your data and storing it for future use.
- Processing your data—this may involve deduplicating it and converting it into a different form so it’s easier to index and search (e.g., using OCR technology to convert images into text).
- Reviewing and analyzing your data to make sure it’s relevant, and to identify any key patterns in it.
- Producing a version of your data that you can securely deliver to necessary parties, such as a court for litigation, or a compliance body.
eDiscovery is a lengthy process, and it can be very time-consuming to go through each of these steps manually. Today, eDiscovery software can help reduce that time, and resource strain, by helping organizations automate data collection, indexing, and analysis.
eDiscovery software solutions help businesses to find and present ESI so that compliance bodies and legal teams can review the data and uncover evidence for litigation or regulatory purposes. So, if your organization is handling sensitive data, or must prove compliance with strict data protection requirements (such as PCI-DSS or HIPAA), it’s a good idea to have an eDiscovery solution—or another kind of data management or archiving solution—in place.
There are a lot of eDiscovery software solutions on the market, and each of them offers a slightly different feature set to meet certain business or legal requirements. However, there are some features that every eDiscovery solution should have:
- A user-friendly means of importing data; this may be via a drag-and-drop interface, or through integrations with your existing infrastructure that enable the eDiscovery tool to pull data from your other applications automatically.
- A granular search tool that allows you to create searches based on specific keywords, as well as filters, labels, and tags.
- Analytics tools that highlight key trends among data, metadata, and tags.
- Automatic data indexing and categorizing, using a filter- or tag-based system.
- Redaction for sensitive, protected, or privileged data.
- Flexible export options that enable you to easily export and share documents in different file formats.
- Access permissions that enable you to control who can access data in your inventory or archive.
- Comprehensive audit functionality that logs any interactions with your data, including the name of the user who carried out the action, what the action was, and when it took place.
GRC And Compliance Resources
Further reading on grc and compliance from Expert Insights — buyers' guides, comparison articles, and platform-specific shortlists.
Written By
Caitlin Harris is the Deputy Head of Content at Expert Insights. As an experienced content writer and editor, Caitlin helps cybersecurity leaders to cut through the noise in the cybersecurity space with expert analysis and insightful recommendations.
Prior to Expert Insights, Caitlin worked at QA Ltd, where she produced award-winning technical training materials, and she has also produced journalistic content over the course of her career.
Caitlin has 8 years of experience in the cybersecurity and technology space, helping technical teams, CISOs, and security professionals find clarity on complex, mission critical topics like security awareness training, backup and recovery, and endpoint protection.
Caitlin also hosts the Expert Insights Podcast and co-writes the weekly newsletter, Decrypted.
Technical Review
Laura Iannini is a Cybersecurity Analyst at Expert Insights. With deep cybersecurity knowledge and strong research skills, she leads Expert Insights’ product testing team, conducting thorough tests of product features and in-depth industry analysis to ensure that Expert Insights’ product reviews are definitive and insightful.
Laura also carries out wider analysis of vendor landscapes and industry trends to inform Expert Insights’ enterprise cybersecurity buyers’ guides, covering topics such as security awareness training, cloud backup and recovery, email security, and network monitoring. Prior to working at Expert Insights, Laura worked as a Senior Information Security Engineer at Constant Edge, where she tested cybersecurity solutions, carried out product demos, and provided high-quality ongoing technical support.
Laura holds a Bachelor’s degree in Cybersecurity from the University of West Florida.