Best 10 Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS) Solutions For Business (2026)
We reviewed the leading DRaaS platforms on RTO and RPO capabilities, the frequency and reliability of automated failover testing, and how well each handles recovery at scale when primary infrastructure is unavailable.
Written by
Joel Witts
Technical Review by
Laura Iannini
Quick Summary
Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) platforms provide cloud-based failover and recovery without requiring secondary physical infrastructure — with automated recovery testing the differentiating factor between platforms that work when needed and those that do not. Recovery plans that have not been tested are assumptions, not strategies. We reviewed the top platforms and found Datto Endpoint Backup With Disaster Recovery, Acronis Advanced Disaster Recovery, and Arcserve UDP to be the strongest on RTO/RPO capability and automated failover testing reliability.
Disaster recovery feels straightforward until it matters. You realize your RTO and RPO targets don’t match your actual recovery capability. Backups pass validation in test labs but fail during real incidents. You lack runbooks for failover or the team expertise to execute them under pressure.
The real problem isn’t finding DR solutions—it’s finding one that actually works when you need it and doesn’t require a dedicated DR engineer on staff.
We evaluated 10 DRaaS platforms across managed and self service models, evaluating each for recovery point and time objectives achievable in practice, ease of failover execution, testing capabilities without production impact, compliance support, and operational overhead. We reviewed customer feedback to identify where vendor RTO claims diverge from actual recovery times.
This guide helps you match the right DRaaS solution to your infrastructure, team size, and whether you prefer managed support or self service control.
Our Recommendations
Your ideal choice depends on whether you want managed hands-off recovery, unified cloud-based protection, or self-service control.
- Best For Centralized Management: Datto SIRIS Every incremental backup becomes a full recovery point through Inverse Chain Technology.
- Best For Cost Efficiency: 11:11 Disaster Recovery as a Service Dedicated disaster recovery engineers handle deployment, testing, and failover execution for you.
- Best For Performance: Acronis Advanced Disaster Recovery Integrates directly into Cyber Protect Cloud for unified backup, security, and DR management.
- Best For Advanced Features: Arcserve Cloud Services One-click failover simplifies site-wide disaster recovery execution when time matters most.
- Best For Enterprise Scale: Axcient x360Recover Chain-free backups eliminate dependency risks that corrupt traditional backup chains over time.
Datto Endpoint Backup With Disaster Recovery is a direct-to-cloud backup and DR solution built for MSPs managing remote and hybrid endpoints. No local hardware is required; hourly backups go straight to Datto’s cloud infrastructure with instant cloud virtualization when you need to recover fast. We think this is a strong option for MSPs protecting distributed workforces without dedicated backup infrastructure.
Datto Endpoint Backup With Disaster Recovery Key Features
Datto Endpoint Backup sends image-based backups directly to the cloud with Cloud Deletion Defense protecting against accidental or malicious data loss. When an endpoint fails, you spin up a virtual instance directly in Datto’s cloud without waiting for hardware shipments. The unified Backup Portal pulls together management for multiple environments, sharing user and client lists with SIRIS, ALTO, and Backup for Microsoft Azure. Automated Hero Reports deliver backup success rates, storage utilization, restore history, and screenshot verification for compliance and client communication.
What Customers Say
Users appreciate the set-and-forget simplicity. Install the agent, configure once, and backups run automatically. Support response times get consistent praise. Something to be aware of is that backup frequency is fixed with no option to customize scheduling intervals beyond the preset schedule. Endpoints also require a single active partition on the C drive for proper backup.
Our Take
We think this fits MSPs and IT teams protecting distributed workforces who want cloud-native endpoint recovery without managing local hardware. The instant cloud virtualization and automated reporting are strong selling points. If you need granular scheduling control over backup frequency, this isn’t the right fit.
Strengths
- Instant cloud virtualization for fast recovery without shipping hardware
- Unified portal manages multiple Datto products from one interface
- Cloud Deletion Defense protects against accidental and malicious data loss
- Automated Hero Reports simplify compliance and client communication
Cautions
- Users report backup frequency is fixed with no scheduling customization
- Endpoints require single active partition on C drive for proper backup
Acronis Advanced Disaster Recovery
Acronis Advanced Disaster Recovery provides DR orchestration for physical and virtual workloads, built around automated failover and runbook execution. It integrates with the broader Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud platform, giving you backup, cybersecurity, and disaster recovery from one console. We think this works well for organizations wanting DR orchestration without enterprise complexity.
Acronis Advanced Disaster Recovery Key Features
Acronis Advanced Disaster Recovery automates failover to Acronis Disaster Recovery Storage with a secure VPN connection between your local site and the cloud. The runbook execution view provides real-time status and full execution history, which matters for proving recovery capabilities to auditors. Granular control over backup and recovery settings lets you tune policies to match different workload requirements. Legacy OS support handles older systems that other vendors have dropped. RPOs and RTOs under 15 minutes keep downtime minimal. Recent updates added Proxmox 9.0 and Nutanix failover support.
What Customers Say
Users consistently praise restore speed. Backups and recoveries run fast compared to alternatives, and data integrity stays solid. Integration with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace works smoothly. Something to be aware of is that console navigation feels unintuitive at times, and error messages lack the detail needed for diagnosing failed backup jobs. Some users flag the UI as dated.
Our Take
We think Acronis Advanced Disaster Recovery fits mid-market teams with mixed environments who want DR orchestration with competitive pricing. The runbook execution history and legacy OS support are strong differentiators. If a polished console experience is a priority, evaluate alternatives.
Strengths
- Automated failover with runbook execution history for audit compliance
- Competitive pricing with legacy OS support for older systems
- Fast restore speeds with reliable data integrity
- Proxmox 9.0 and Nutanix failover support added recently
Cautions
- Customers note console navigation feels unintuitive with a learning curve
- Reviews flag error messages lack detail for efficient troubleshooting
Arcserve UDP
Arcserve UDP is a unified data protection platform combining backup, disaster recovery, and ransomware resilience for physical, virtual, and cloud workloads. It targets mid-market teams who want solid DR capabilities without a steep learning curve. We think this is a good fit for organizations prioritizing storage efficiency and centralized management.
Arcserve UDP Key Features
Arcserve UDP pairs a deep learning neural network with signature-based detection for ransomware protection, blocking threats before they reach your backups. Immutable cloud storage prevents deletion or alteration of backup data. Users report compression ratios up to 20:1, which translates to real storage cost savings. The unified management console handles physical, virtual, and cloud workloads from a single dashboard. You group applications by business need for streamlined failover, and automated DR testing with reporting validates recovery without manual effort. AI-powered cyber resilience capabilities were added in a 2025 update.
What Customers Say
Users praise ease of use and a simple restore process. The centralized console gets consistent positive feedback for keeping operations manageable. Storage efficiency delivers tangible cost benefits. Something to be aware of is that support response times and resolution quality receive consistent criticism. New Linux kernel support lags behind releases, and the same delay applies to application updates like SAP.
Our Take
We think Arcserve UDP fits mid-market organizations wanting enterprise DR features with a manageable learning curve. The 20:1 data reduction and unified console make daily operations straightforward. The support experience is a real concern that needs consideration before committing.
Strengths
- Data reduction up to 20:1 delivers significant storage cost savings
- Unified console manages physical, virtual, and cloud workloads
- Immutable cloud storage protects backups from ransomware
- AI-powered ransomware detection added in 2025 update
Cautions
- Reviews mention support response times and resolution quality lag behind competitors
- Linux kernel and application version support lags behind releases
Carbonite Recover
Carbonite Recover is a cloud-based disaster recovery solution focused on replicating critical systems with granular recovery points measured in minutes and seconds. It targets organizations wanting reliable DR without infrastructure complexity. We think this is a solid choice for organizations prioritizing tight recovery points and multi-tier application orchestration.
Carbonite Recover Key Features
Carbonite Recover delivers recovery point granularity down to minutes and seconds, which matters when data changes rapidly. Boot order and failover orchestration handle multi-tier applications, bringing dependent systems up in the right sequence. Automated discovery identifies workloads in your environment without manual inventory. Built-in encryption covers data in transit and at rest. Non-disruptive DR testing lets you validate recovery without impacting production, and bandwidth optimization keeps network impact minimal during tests and replication. The solution scales with organizational growth across changing device mixes.
What Customers Say
Users consistently praise reliability and ease of deployment. File recovery works quickly, even from virus-infected systems. Recent portal and software updates improved backup consistency and simplified administration. Something to be aware of is that pricing draws the most criticism. Costs rise with storage volume, and Microsoft 365 environments get expensive fast. Users also flag price increases without corresponding feature additions.
Our Take
We think Carbonite Recover works well for organizations prioritizing reliability and simplicity over feature depth. The granular recovery points and multi-tier orchestration handle mission-critical workloads well. If cost predictability matters, the storage-based pricing model needs careful evaluation.
Strengths
- Granular recovery points down to minutes and seconds
- Multi-tier application orchestration with boot order sequencing
- Non-disruptive testing makes regular DR validation practical
- Scales smoothly as organizations grow and device mixes change
Cautions
- Users report storage-based pricing gets expensive with large volumes
- Reviews flag price increases over time without corresponding new features
Microsoft Azure Site Recovery
Microsoft Azure Site Recovery is a native DRaaS solution for organizations already invested in the Azure ecosystem. It handles replication and failover for VMs across regions with failover times measured in seconds. We think this is the natural choice for Azure-native environments running Windows workloads.
Microsoft Azure Site Recovery Key Features
Azure Site Recovery delivers fast failover with native Azure integration, meaning new features arrive immediately upon release rather than waiting for third-party integration cycles. Multi-tier application sequencing handles dependent VMs in the right order during recovery. Non-disruptive testing validates DR plans without impacting production workloads. The cost model eliminates secondary datacenter expenses through cloud-native replication. Recent updates include NVMe-enabled VM support, Premium SSD v2 disk replication in preview, Shared Disk protection for Windows Server Failover Clusters, and Azure Monitor alerts integration for critical DR events.
What Customers Say
Users praise the guided setup process and straightforward configuration. Automated failover and reliable replication get consistent positive feedback. Integration with existing Azure services simplifies the DR architecture. Something to be aware of is that Linux distribution support is limited, with the latest features lagging. Initial synchronization consumes significant bandwidth and time.
Our Take
We think Azure Site Recovery makes sense for Azure-native environments where the integration, failover speed, and testing capabilities check the boxes. The continuous stream of feature updates keeps the platform current. If Linux distribution support is critical to your environment, evaluate that gap carefully.
Strengths
- Failover times measured in seconds with high reliability
- Native Azure integration means features arrive without third-party delays
- Non-disruptive testing enables regular DR validation
- Eliminates secondary datacenter costs through cloud-native replication
Cautions
- Reviews flag Linux distribution support is limited with latest features lagging
- Initial synchronization consumes significant bandwidth and time
Nakivo Site Recovery for DR Orchestration
Nakivo Site Recovery delivers DR orchestration for virtual, cloud, and SaaS environments with one-click failover and automated workflow sequencing. It targets SMBs and enterprises wanting fast, straightforward disaster recovery without operational complexity. We think this is a strong option for VMware and Hyper-V shops prioritizing reliability and simplicity.
Nakivo Site Recovery Key Features
Nakivo Site Recovery recovers VMs in seconds with one-click workflow orchestration that triggers automated DR sequences without manual intervention. Data replication, planned failover, emergency failover, and fallback all configure through the same interface. Non-disruptive testing runs on schedule or on demand without impacting production. Backup target flexibility covers NAS, USB, and AWS for 3-2-1 strategies. The v11.2 release in April 2026 added full vSphere 9 and Proxmox VE 9.0 support, with an automated real-time replication engine that keeps replica VMs synchronized with production workloads.
What Customers Say
Users praise stability above everything else. Multi-year deployments run without failures. Technical support gets consistently positive feedback for responsiveness and resolution quality. Value for money resonates across SMB and education sector deployments. Something to be aware of is that the support licensing model requires backdating if coverage lapses before purchasing more. Google Workspace backup is not currently supported.
Our Take
We think Nakivo Site Recovery fits organizations prioritizing reliability and simplicity, particularly VMware shops and education environments. The speed, stability, and per-socket pricing keep things predictable. The v11.2 release with vSphere 9 and Proxmox support broadens the platform coverage further.
Strengths
- VM recovery in seconds with one-click failover automation
- Multi-year deployment stability without failures reported by users
- Per-socket pricing keeps costs predictable and transparent
- vSphere 9 and Proxmox VE 9.0 support added in v11.2
Cautions
- Support licensing requires backdating if coverage lapses before renewal
- Google Workspace backup not currently supported
RecoveryManager Plus
RecoveryManager Plus is a unified backup and recovery tool from ManageEngine covering Active Directory, Entra ID, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Exchange, and Zoho WorkDrive. It is delivered as part of the AD360 identity management suite, targeting IT teams who need identity and SaaS data protection in one platform. We think this works well for organizations standardized on ManageEngine tools or needing unified identity and SaaS backup.
RecoveryManager Plus Key Features
RecoveryManager Plus provides complete backup of users, groups, devices, applications, and security policies for M365 and Google Workspace. AD environments get full object backup with point-in-time recovery, and restart-free recovery restores AD objects without bringing down domain controllers. Cloud app configuration takes minutes with straightforward setup. Storage flexibility covers on-premises, Azure Blob Storage, Azure Files, AWS S3, Wasabi, and other S3-compatible repositories. Recent updates include S3-compatible storage support, syslog server integration for audit logs, and Entra ID BitLocker recovery key backup.
What Customers Say
Users praise the intuitive interface and ease of use. The dashboard consolidates all backup data in one view, simplifying daily operations. AD audit capabilities provide valuable historical tracking for compliance. Something to be aware of is that update release frequency can lag, and the product is delivered as part of the AD360 suite rather than as a standalone offering.
Our Take
We think RecoveryManager Plus fits organizations already in the ManageEngine ecosystem or those needing unified identity and SaaS backup from one console. The restart-free AD recovery and fast cloud app setup are strong selling points. If you need a standalone backup product outside the AD360 suite, broader options exist.
Strengths
- Unified backup across AD, Entra ID, M365, Google Workspace, and Exchange
- Restart-free AD recovery without bringing down domain controllers
- Cloud app configuration takes minutes with straightforward setup
- Flexible storage including S3-compatible repositories, Azure, and on-premises
Cautions
- Reviews mention update release frequency can lag and disrupt workflows
- Delivered as part of AD360 suite rather than a standalone product
Veeam Disaster Recovery Orchestrator
Veeam Disaster Recovery Orchestrator delivers DR orchestration with automated plan generation, zero-impact testing, and one-click recovery for virtual, physical, and cloud workloads. Now called Veeam Recovery Orchestrator, it targets organizations needing documented, verifiable DR plans that satisfy compliance requirements. We think this fits organizations prioritizing documented, testable DR plans for compliance and audit readiness.
Veeam Disaster Recovery Orchestrator Key Features
Veeam Recovery Orchestrator creates documented DR plans that prove readiness for auditors and compliance teams. Zero-impact DR tests run on schedule or on demand without disrupting production, validating RTOs and RPOs against actual recovery performance. Granular restore capabilities allow pinpoint recovery of individual records or metadata without full rollbacks. M365 coverage spans Exchange, OneDrive, SharePoint, and Teams. The v7.2 release in February 2025 added Hyper-V support with VMware-to-Hyper-V migration capabilities. Ransomware scanning identifies the latest clean restore point before recovery.
What Customers Say
Users praise reliability after initial setup. Restores work as expected, and support teams are accessible when needed. The granular recovery options reduce downtime by targeting exactly what needs restoration. Something to be aware of is that initial setup requires effort, especially for selective SharePoint and Teams backup. Reporting options and third-party integration capabilities are limited.
Our Take
We think Veeam Recovery Orchestrator works well for organizations that need to prove DR readiness to auditors with documented, tested plans. The zero-impact testing and compliance documentation are real differentiators. The v7.2 Hyper-V support and VMware migration capabilities broaden the platform beyond VMware-only environments.
Strengths
- Documented DR plans with verification for compliance and audit requirements
- Zero-impact testing validates RTOs and RPOs without production disruption
- Complete M365 coverage including Exchange, OneDrive, SharePoint, and Teams
- Hyper-V support and VMware-to-Hyper-V migration added in v7.2
Cautions
- Customers note initial setup requires effort for SharePoint and Teams backup
- Reviews flag limited reporting options and third-party integration
VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery
VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery is a SaaS-delivered DR solution for VMware environments, now part of VMware Live Recovery under Broadcom. It offers near-instant recovery with Live Mount technology and flexible deployment options including pilot light and on-demand capacity models. We think this fits committed VMware shops wanting DR that integrates natively without introducing new infrastructure paradigms.
VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery Key Features
VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery boots VMs directly from stored snapshots via Live Mount without waiting for full data restoration. Stored replica VMs activate automatically when an attack or failure occurs. DR health checks run every 30 minutes with automatic email alerts when issues surface. One-click failback orchestration simplifies the return to normal operations. Immutable snapshots through the Scale-out Cloud File System protect against ransomware, with RPOs as low as 30 minutes. Recovery plan testing runs without production downtime.
What Customers Say
Users praise the fast, reliable recovery process and natural VMware integration. The interface is clean with good visibility during recovery operations. Non-disruptive test failovers get consistent positive feedback. Something to be aware of is that the licensing model creates confusion when scaling. Documentation needs work for complex recovery scenarios, and new users face a steep learning curve.
Our Take
We think VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery works well for VMware-native organizations wanting SaaS-delivered DR without legacy complexity. The Live Mount recovery speed and automated health checks are strong selling points. Organizations running mixed hypervisor environments or seeking vendor-neutral DR may find the VMware-specific approach limiting.
Strengths
- Near-instant recovery with Live Mount boots VMs directly from snapshots
- Automated health checks every 30 minutes catch issues proactively
- Non-disruptive test failovers validate DR plans without production impact
- One-click failback simplifies the return to normal operations
Cautions
- Users report the licensing model creates confusion when scaling
- Reviews flag documentation gaps for complex recovery scenarios
Zerto
Zerto is a continuous data protection platform from Hewlett Packard Enterprise that delivers near-synchronous replication with journal-based recovery for on-premises and cloud workloads. It targets larger organizations wanting granular recovery points and application-centric protection. We think this is one of the strongest options for enterprises needing the lowest possible RPOs across complex, multi-tier environments.
Zerto Key Features
Zerto uses always-on replication that creates thousands of recovery points, delivering RPOs measured in seconds rather than hours. Journal-based recovery logs all changes, letting you roll back to the exact moment before an incident. Multi-VM applications recover as one cohesive unit, maintaining consistency across dependent systems like database servers, application servers, and web tiers. Built-in orchestration automates failover without production impact. The platform supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid combinations across Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, and Oracle Cloud without vendor lock-in.
What Customers Say
Users praise reliability and ease of use. Technical support gets strong marks for timely solutions. Teams report significantly reduced RTOs after deployment. Something to be aware of is that implementation requires properly sized targets to avoid deployment issues. VMware version upgrades create operational overhead, requiring VMs to be moved off protected hosts during ESX upgrades.
Our Take
We think Zerto fits larger organizations with the resources to properly size their environment upfront and manage VMware upgrade cycles. The granular recovery points and application-centric protection justify the investment for complex, multi-tier applications. Organizations with simpler DR needs may find less expensive alternatives sufficient.
Strengths
- Journal-based recovery enables pinpoint restoration to moments before incidents
- Application-centric protection recovers multi-VM applications as cohesive units
- Automated failover executes quickly without production impact
- Platform-agnostic design supports Azure, AWS, Google Cloud, and Oracle
Cautions
- Reviews mention implementation requires properly sized targets to avoid issues
- VMware version upgrades create operational overhead and complexity
What To Look For: DRaaS Solutions Checklist
When evaluating DRaaS platforms, focus on recovery objectives you can actually achieve, not vendor claims made under perfect conditions.
- Recovery Point and Time Objectives: What RPO and RTO does the platform actually deliver in practice, not in marketing materials? How do they measure RTO – time to first system availability or to full functionality? Can you validate these claims through customer references?
- Testing and Validation: Can you test failover without impacting production? How often can you run tests? Does the platform validate backup integrity automatically or do you handle that manually? Can you demonstrate compliance readiness to auditors?
- Failover Execution and Runbooks: Can non experts execute failover or does it require specialized knowledge? Does the platform include runbook templates? Can you automate failover sequences or does each one require manual execution? What’s the actual experience from customers in crisis situations?
- Infrastructure Flexibility and Lock In: Are you locked into one cloud provider or can you recover to multiple destinations? Can recovery happen on premises or only in cloud? Does the platform support hybrid deployments or require you to consolidate on one platform?
- Support Model and Expertise Requirements: Does the vendor provide managed support or do you manage failover yourself? How responsive is support during actual incidents? What’s the realistic learning curve for your team?
- Compliance and Data Residency: Does the platform meet your compliance requirements – HIPAA, SOC 2, GDPR? Can you control where data is stored? Are backup locations flexible or locked into specific regions?
How We Compared The Best Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS) Solutions
Expert Insights is an independent editorial team that researches, tests, and reviews cybersecurity and IT solutions. No vendor can pay to influence our review of their products. Our Editor’s Scores are based solely on product quality and actual recovery outcomes.
We evaluated 10 DRaaS platforms across managed and self service models, assessing actual RPO and RTO delivery in practice not just under optimal conditions, ease of failover execution for teams under pressure, testing capabilities without production impact, integration with existing hypervisors and cloud platforms, and support responsiveness during incidents.
Beyond hands on testing, we conducted in depth market research across the DRaaS landscape, reviewed customer feedback from organizations across healthcare, finance, and enterprise, and spoke with teams to understand where vendor RTO claims diverge from actual recovery times. Our focus was identifying platforms that work when disasters actually happen, not under test lab conditions.
This guide is updated quarterly. For full details on our evaluation process, visit our How We Test and Review Products page.
The Bottom Line
Your choice depends on your infrastructure, whether your team can manage failover, and how aggressive your recovery objectives need to be.
For verified backups and ransomware defense, Datto SIRIS validates every backup before you rely on it. The configuration demands upfront attention.
- For managed DR without building expertise, 11:11
For pure SaaS simplicity on AWS, Druva Cloud Disaster Recovery eliminates secondary site infrastructure entirely. Recovery happens across AWS regions with hour level RPO. Policy setup requires thought upfront.
For continuous replication and aggressive recovery objectives, Zerto DRaaS delivers recovery points measured in seconds rather than hours.
For VMware first environments, VMware Cloud Disaster Recovery integrates natively with pilot light and on demand capacity models.
Read the individual reviews above to dig into deployment specifics, pricing, and the operational tradeoffs that matter for your environment.
FAQs
Everything You Need To Know About Disaster Recovery as a Service Solutions (FAQs)
Disaster Recovery-as-a-Service (DRaaS) solutions provide data protection and backup services that ensure companies can continue operation even in the event of a large data loss event, such as a cyber-attack, natural disaster, or any other business disruption. DRaaS typically involves replicating critical data and applications to a cloud environment. In the event of a disaster, organizations can quickly recover and run their systems from the cloud, ensuring minimal downtime.
DRaaS services offer a number of benefits to companies. They offer clear, flexible pricing models, often with multiple subscription options and monthly or annual payment terms. They are very easy to deploy, and often deliver high quality support to ensure customers can quickly resolve issues if they may arise.
Disaster Recovery-as-a-service solutions host data backup and failover services in servers managed by a third-party vendor. The DRaaS provider will typically also offer managed services, in which the organization will also plan, test, and manage the disaster recovery plan, and will take ultimate responsibility over your disaster recovery strategy.
Companies typically pay on a subscription model to back up their data with the guarantee that if a disaster occurs, the vendor will help the organization to recover swiftly and efficiently. The subscription would typically be a monthly or annual payment based on the amount of data stored and features opted for.
There are many advantages for organizations to deploy a DRaaS solution. They are far more cost-effective and robust than building an in-house disaster recovery framework or trying to backup data across all applications and services internally. DRaaS solutions provide organizations with a reliable and efficient mechanism to safeguard their data and applications, reduce downtime, and ensure business continuity in the face of unexpected events.
When evaluating a disaster recovery solution, whether it’s a traditional on-premises solution or a cloud-based service, it’s important to consider a range of features to ensure it effectively meets your organization’s needs. Here are key features to look for in a disaster recovery solution:
- Data Replication: Look for data replication capabilities that allow you to create and maintain copies of critical data in real-time or at scheduled intervals. This ensures that data is available for recovery in case of a disaster.
- Automated Failover and Failback: Automation is crucial for minimizing downtime. The solution should enable automated failover to secondary systems during a disaster and automated failback when the primary systems are restored.
- Reliability and Availability: Ensure the solution provides high reliability and availability. This includes redundant systems, failover capabilities, and service level agreements (SLAs) that guarantee uptime.
- Testing and Validation: Regular testing of the disaster recovery plan is essential. The solution should facilitate testing without disrupting normal operations, allowing you to validate the effectiveness of your recovery procedures.
- Flexible Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) and Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs): The solution should allow customization of RPOs and RTOs to meet the specific needs of different applications and systems within your organization.
- Security Measures: Security features, including encryption during data transfer and storage, access controls, and authentication mechanisms, are crucial for protecting sensitive data during the recovery process.
- Comprehensive Coverage: Ensure that the disaster recovery solution covers all critical aspects of your IT infrastructure, including servers, databases, applications, and network configurations.
- Monitoring: Robust monitoring tools should be included to track the status of the disaster recovery environment, provide alerts for potential issues, and generate reports for compliance or auditing purposes.
- Customer Support and SLAs: Assess the level of customer support provided by the solution vendor. Clear SLAs should outline the vendor’s commitment to service, including response times, resolution times, and support availability.
Written By
Joel is the Director of Content and a co-founder at Expert Insights; a rapidly growing media company focussed on covering cybersecurity solutions.
He’s an experienced journalist and editor with 8 years’ experience covering the cybersecurity space. He’s reviewed hundreds of cybersecurity solutions, interviewed hundreds of industry experts and produced dozens of industry reports read by thousands of CISOs and security professionals in topics like IAM, MFA, zero trust, email security, DevSecOps and more.
He also hosts the Expert Insights Podcast and co-writes the weekly newsletter, Decrypted. Joel is driven to share his team’s expertise with cybersecurity leaders to help them create more secure business foundations.
Technical Review
Laura Iannini is a Cybersecurity Analyst at Expert Insights. With deep cybersecurity knowledge and strong research skills, she leads Expert Insights’ product testing team, conducting thorough tests of product features and in-depth industry analysis to ensure that Expert Insights’ product reviews are definitive and insightful.
Laura also carries out wider analysis of vendor landscapes and industry trends to inform Expert Insights’ enterprise cybersecurity buyers’ guides, covering topics such as security awareness training, cloud backup and recovery, email security, and network monitoring. Prior to working at Expert Insights, Laura worked as a Senior Information Security Engineer at Constant Edge, where she tested cybersecurity solutions, carried out product demos, and provided high-quality ongoing technical support.
Laura holds a Bachelor’s degree in Cybersecurity from the University of West Florida.