Technical Review by
Laura Iannini
The top alternatives to Proofpoint email security cover a range of approaches to protecting cloud email environments against phishing, business email compromise, account takeover, and data loss. Some replace Proofpoint’s gateway model with API-based detection that layers on top of native M365 or Google Workspace controls. Others match Proofpoint’s breadth while adding capabilities like outbound encryption, behavioral AI, or built-in security awareness training. The right alternative depends on where your current protection falls short and how your email infrastructure is set up.
We’ve evaluated email security platforms across enterprise, mid-market, and MSP environments, testing detection accuracy, deployment model, integration depth, and how each platform handles threats that bypass native email controls. This guide covers the alternatives that offer meaningful differentiation from Proofpoint across detection approach, deployment flexibility, and operational overhead.
Proofpoint alternatives are email security platforms that organizations evaluate when their current Proofpoint deployment no longer fits on cost, complexity, detection approach, or missing capabilities. These alternatives range from traditional secure email gateways that match Proofpoint's gateway model to API-based platforms that take a fundamentally different approach by sitting inside the email tenant. The right alternative depends on whether you need a like-for-like gateway replacement, behavioral AI detection, outbound encryption, or coverage that extends beyond the email perimeter.
The Proofpoint alternative landscape splits across three architecture types. Gateway replacements like Barracuda and Cisco Secure Email intercept mail via MX record changes, offering comparable policy depth and threat intelligence scale. API-based platforms like Abnormal AI and IRONSCALES deploy inside the M365 or Google Workspace tenant, inspecting messages post-delivery and detecting account takeover through behavioral baselines without altering mail flow. Workspace security platforms like Material Security extend beyond email to protect inbox data, identity, OAuth connections, and file permissions across the entire cloud environment. The architectural choice drives downstream decisions around SIEM integration, internal email visibility, outbound DLP coverage, and operational overhead. Organizations moving from Proofpoint should match their primary gap, whether that is detection approach, deployment friction, outbound controls, or cost, to the platform architecture before comparing individual features.
These 9 platforms cover the full range of Proofpoint alternatives, from workspace security and behavioral AI to traditional gateways and MSP-focused solutions.
| Product | Best For | Type | M365 | Google Workspace | Outbound DLP/Encryption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Material Security
|
Full cloud workspace protection
|
ICES
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Abnormal AI
|
Behavioral AI and account takeover prevention
|
ICES
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Barracuda
|
Combined security, training, and M365 backup
|
SEG + API
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
|
Check Point Email Security
|
API-based gateway replacement with collaboration coverage
|
ICES
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Cisco Secure Email
|
Enterprises in the Cisco ecosystem
|
SEG
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Forcepoint Email Security
|
Unified DLP across email and data channels
|
SEG
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
IRONSCALES
|
Adaptive phishing defense with built-in training
|
ICES
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
TitanHQ, powered by CyberSentriq
|
MSPs and SMBs managing multi-domain filtering
|
SEG
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
|
Trustifi
|
Inbound protection with outbound encryption
|
ICES
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
We assessed each platform’s detection capabilities against phishing, BEC, credential theft, and account compromise, evaluating deployment models and how each fits alongside existing email controls. We reviewed verified customer feedback to validate catch rates and time to value. This guide was written by Alex Zawalnyski and technically reviewed by Laura Iannini. Read our full methodology
Material Security provides a complete cloud workspace security platform for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365. It addresses email, identity and data security threats with a multi-layered platform that includes inbound threat protection, account compromise detection and automated threat response.
Where traditional email security tools filter threats at the perimeter and stop there, Material integrates directly with Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 via API to cover the full attack lifecycle, before, during, and after a threat reaches the inbox.
Material is highly effective at slowing down attacks and limiting the exposure of user data, according to reviews of the service written by security teams. Security teams also highlight the automated remediation and phishing investigation capabilities as significant time savers for analysts.
Deploying the service is very straightforward, and reporting is another strength of the platform. Some customers do say that some rules can require advanced configuration, but the Material support team is helpful and responsive.
Proofpoint is a serious product, and teams running it are catching real threats. The case for Material isn’t that those teams are wrong; it’s that perimeter defense is one part of a larger problem. What happens to the attacker who gets through, or who bypasses email entirely via OAuth or session hijacking? Proofpoint doesn’t have an answer for that. Material does: inbound detection, sensitive data lockdown, identity controls, and continuous OAuth monitoring, all in a single platform that deploys via API alongside your existing stack, no MX record changes, no mail routing disruption.
If your team is evaluating alternatives to a perimeter-focused tool and needs a platform that covers the full workspace, not just the door, Material is worth a serious look.
Best for behavioral AI and account takeover prevention at enterprise scale
Abnormal AI is an API-based email security platform that builds behavioral profiles of how your people communicate and flags deviations. It connects directly to Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace via API, learns normal communication patterns, and catches the social engineering attacks that rule-based filters miss. We found the behavioral approach particularly effective against BEC, impersonation, and account takeover.
Customers praise the fast deployment and minimal resource requirements. Detection accuracy stays high without the policy tweaking that legacy gateways demand. Something to be aware of is that the post-delivery model has a timing limitation: some phishing emails may briefly reach inboxes before Abnormal can remove them. Some users also want better executive-level reporting capabilities.
We think Abnormal AI is a strong Proofpoint alternative if you want behavioral detection that just runs without constant tuning. The cross-platform data ingestion from Slack and Active Directory adds context that email-only tools miss. The API-first deployment means no mail flow changes, making it a strong supplementary layer alongside native Microsoft or Google protections.
Best for combined email security, awareness training, and M365 backup
Barracuda Email Protection combines traditional gateway filtering with AI-powered behavioral analysis to stop phishing, ransomware, BEC, and account takeover. It targets organizations of all sizes that want layered email security with Microsoft 365 integration. We think the combination of gateway and post-delivery protection gives it strong coverage across the full threat lifecycle.
Users praise the reliable threat detection and the scope of the integrated platform. The Microsoft 365 integration gets strong marks for ease of setup. Automated incident response is valued for reducing manual effort. Something to be aware of is that some users find the admin interface takes time to navigate, and reporting granularity could be improved for organizations wanting detailed analytics.
We think Barracuda is a solid Proofpoint alternative for organizations that want layered email security combining gateway and API-based protection in one platform. The post-delivery threat hunting adds a layer that catches what initial filtering misses. The included backup and recovery for Microsoft 365 data is a practical bonus that most email security vendors do not offer. If you need only API-based behavioral detection without gateway filtering, a more focused platform may be a better fit.
Best for API-based gateway replacement with collaboration app coverage
Check Point Email Security (formerly Avanan, rebranded March 2026) is an API-based email and collaboration security platform that uses NLP-powered threat prevention to catch phishing before it reaches the inbox. It protects Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Teams, SharePoint, Slack, and Dropbox. We think the multi-platform collaboration coverage makes it a strong alternative for organizations that need protection beyond email.
Users praise the quick deployment, typically under two days, and high malware detection rates. The Microsoft Entra ID integration gets positive feedback for account security. Something to be aware of is that some users find the admin portal navigation clunky, with configuration changes sometimes requiring multiple attempts. Support experiences are reported as inconsistent.
We think Check Point Email Security is a strong Proofpoint alternative if you need protection extending beyond email to collaboration tools. The API deployment means no MX record changes, and the reported 99.2% phishing reduction demonstrates strong detection efficacy. If your needs are limited to email-only protection, a more focused platform may offer a simpler experience.
Best for enterprises already running Cisco infrastructure with Talos intelligence
Cisco Secure Email provides enterprise-grade email protection backed by Talos, one of the largest commercial threat research teams in the industry. It covers phishing, BEC, malware, and ransomware with full visibility into inbound, outbound, and internal messages. We think the Talos intelligence depth gives Cisco an edge that few competitors can replicate.
Users praise the integrated dashboard and the quality of Talos threat intelligence. Support gets consistently strong marks for responsiveness. Something to be aware of is that the range of features can feel overwhelming without dedicated time to learn the platform. Some users report occasional Java-related friction points when opening emails through certain interfaces.
We think Cisco Secure Email is a strong Proofpoint alternative if you are already a Cisco shop or want enterprise-grade threat intelligence depth. The Talos intelligence combined with XDR integration makes remediation fast when seconds matter. If you are not already invested in the Cisco ecosystem, the platform’s full value depends on how deeply you integrate it.
Best for organizations where DLP and email threat protection must work together
Forcepoint Email Security combines behavioral detection, URL and attachment sandboxing, and spoofing protection to block advanced threats including zero-day variants. It is part of Forcepoint’s unified data security platform, which lets you enforce consistent policies across email, web, cloud apps, and endpoints. We think the flexible deployment options across cloud, hybrid, and on-premises environments make it a practical choice for organizations with complex infrastructure.
Users appreciate the flexible deployment options and the DLP integration with Forcepoint’s broader platform. The real-time alerting and reporting get positive feedback. Something to be aware of is that the platform is primarily positioned as part of the broader Forcepoint data security ecosystem, which means standalone email security buyers may find tighter-focused platforms simpler to evaluate and deploy.
We think Forcepoint Email Security is a Proofpoint alternative worth considering if email security is part of a broader data security strategy and you need consistent DLP enforcement across channels. The flexible deployment across cloud, hybrid, and on-premises environments fits organizations with complex or legacy infrastructure. If you are looking for a standalone, API-first email security platform, other options in this list may be a better fit.
Best for adaptive phishing defense with built-in simulation and training
IRONSCALES is an adaptive AI-driven email security platform that combines threat detection with automated phishing simulations and security awareness training. It protects against BEC, account takeover, deepfakes, QR-code attacks, and social engineering while reducing manual SOC workload through agentic automation. We think it is a strong alternative for organizations that want detection and training unified in one platform.
Users consistently praise the intuitive interface and simple installation. The API-based deployment is fast with no disruption. Automation is valued for reducing manual review workload and supporting cyber insurance qualification. Something to be aware of is that some advanced features take time to master, and granular regional or group settings require manual admin effort.
We think IRONSCALES is a strong Proofpoint alternative for organizations that want unified email security and awareness training at accessible pricing. The adaptive AI learns your environment rather than relying on static rules, and the agentic SOC automation reduces the manual burden. If you need only detection technology without the training component, a more focused platform may be a better fit.
Best for MSPs and SMBs managing email filtering across multiple domains
CyberSentriq Email Security, now part of the CyberSentriq platform, provides email protection and phishing prevention serving over 3,000 MSPs and 150,000 SMBs worldwide. The SpamTitan gateway handles spam, malware, and virus filtering, while PhishTitan adds AI-powered phishing protection for Microsoft 365. We think the MSP-focused design and fast deployment make it a practical choice for service providers and smaller teams.
Users praise the high spam catch rate and the ease of setup. MSPs appreciate the multi-tenant management and fast deployment. Quarantine reports give end users control over their accounts. Something to be aware of is that PhishTitan is designed for Microsoft 365 environments.
We think CyberSentriq is a strong Proofpoint alternative for MSPs and SMBs that want effective, affordable email security without enterprise complexity. The combination of SpamTitan gateway filtering and PhishTitan’s M365 phishing protection covers the core threat landscape. The MSP-focused design with multi-tenant management fits service provider workflows well.
Best for compliance-heavy environments needing inbound protection with outbound encryption
Trustifi is an AI-powered email security platform that combines inbound threat protection, outbound DLP and encryption, account takeover detection, archiving, and security awareness training. The Inbound Shield uses four AI-enabled filtering engines to catch BEC, spam, graymail, and vendor email compromise. We think the all-in-one approach covering both inbound and outbound email security makes it a practical choice for organizations that want a single vendor.
Users praise the ease of deployment and the intuitive interface. The combination of inbound and outbound protection in one platform is valued for reducing vendor sprawl. Something to be aware of is that the platform is newer to the enterprise market compared to established vendors, and some users note that integration options with third-party SIEM and SOAR tools could be expanded.
We think Trustifi is a strong Proofpoint alternative for organizations that want inbound and outbound email security, encryption, and training in a single platform. The four-engine Inbound Shield covers a wider range of threat categories than many competitors. The built-in encryption and DLP for outbound email means you do not need a separate solution for sensitive communications. For large enterprises with complex SIEM and SOAR integration requirements, verify the platform meets your integration needs during evaluation.
Pricing across Proofpoint alternatives varies significantly by deployment model, organization size, and bundled capabilities. Several enterprise vendors require a sales conversation. The prices below reflect publicly available starting rates where published.
| Product | Starting Price | Billing | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Material Security
|
From $3.00/user/month
|
Annual
|
|
|
Abnormal AI
|
Contact for quote
|
|
|
|
Barracuda
|
From $2.66/user/month
|
Annual
|
|
|
Check Point Email Security
|
Contact for quote
|
|
|
|
Cisco Secure Email
|
Contact for quote
|
|
|
|
Forcepoint Email Security
|
Contact for quote
|
|
|
|
IRONSCALES
|
From $3.89/user/month
|
Annual
|
|
|
TitanHQ, powered by CyberSentriq
|
From $1.95/user/month
|
Annual
|
|
|
Trustifi
|
From $3.00/user/month
|
Annual
|
|
These are the criteria we recommend evaluating when selecting a Proofpoint alternative.
Proofpoint excels at gateway-based threat intelligence; match your alternative to the specific weakness you need to address rather than replacing everything.
Gateway alternatives require MX record changes; API-based platforms layer on top of native controls without altering mail flow.
Proofpoint focuses on inbound threats; alternatives that cover outbound DLP, OAuth monitoring, identity controls, or collaboration apps may address gaps Proofpoint leaves open.
Cisco, Check Point, and Barracuda deliver strongest value within their respective vendor ecosystems; standalone platforms avoid lock-in but add another point solution.
These are the attack types most likely to expose detection differences between gateway-based filtering and behavioral AI approaches.
IRONSCALES and Barracuda bundle training with detection; evaluate whether consolidation simplifies operations versus dedicated training platforms.
Detection accuracy varies significantly by environment; run a proof of concept to validate real-world performance.
A defined migration plan with rollback capability protects against detection gaps during the transition from Proofpoint.
Start by identifying where Proofpoint is falling short in your environment: detection gaps, deployment friction, missing outbound controls, or cost. Narrow your shortlist to platforms that address those specific gaps while fitting your email stack and operational capacity. Validate detection accuracy and false positive rates against your own mail flow before committing to a replacement.
Further reading on email security from Expert Insights — buyers' guides, comparison articles, and platform-specific shortlists.
Joel is the Director of Content and a co-founder at Expert Insights; a rapidly growing media company focussed on covering cybersecurity solutions.
He’s an experienced journalist and editor with 8 years’ experience covering the cybersecurity space. He’s reviewed hundreds of cybersecurity solutions, interviewed hundreds of industry experts and produced dozens of industry reports read by thousands of CISOs and security professionals in topics like IAM, MFA, zero trust, email security, DevSecOps and more.
He also hosts the Expert Insights Podcast and co-writes the weekly newsletter, Decrypted. Joel is driven to share his team’s expertise with cybersecurity leaders to help them create more secure business foundations.
Laura Iannini is a Cybersecurity Analyst at Expert Insights. With deep cybersecurity knowledge and strong research skills, she leads Expert Insights’ product testing team, conducting thorough tests of product features and in-depth industry analysis to ensure that Expert Insights’ product reviews are definitive and insightful.
Laura also carries out wider analysis of vendor landscapes and industry trends to inform Expert Insights’ enterprise cybersecurity buyers’ guides, covering topics such as security awareness training, cloud backup and recovery, email security, and network monitoring. Prior to working at Expert Insights, Laura worked as a Senior Information Security Engineer at Constant Edge, where she tested cybersecurity solutions, carried out product demos, and provided high-quality ongoing technical support.
Laura holds a Bachelor’s degree in Cybersecurity from the University of West Florida.