Technical Review by
Laura Iannini
Azure’s native VM backup capabilities have coverage gaps, particularly in cross-region recovery and granular object restoration, that third-party solutions are specifically designed to address. Third-party Azure VM backup solutions supplement native capabilities with more flexible retention and cross-region failover management. We reviewed 9 solutions and found Datto Backup for Microsoft Azure, Redstor Powered by CyberSentriq, and Acronis Cyber Protect to be the strongest on recovery granularity and cross-region failover capability.
Backing up your Azure VMs sounds straightforward until you need to restore one. The challenge isn’t backing up, Azure Backup handles that natively. The real problem is understanding your recovery options, managing retention across multiple VMs, handling compliance requirements, and knowing whether your backups actually work when disaster strikes.
Azure native backup works fine for basic protection, but organizations running complex workloads often need more flexibility: multi-region recovery, granular restore options, integration with on-premises infrastructure, or backup-to-backup redundancy. The wrong choice means either paying for features you don’t use or discovering gaps when you need the backup most.
We evaluated 9 backup solutions specifically designed for Azure VMs, evaluating each for backup performance, recovery time and data objectives, multi-region failover capability, integration with Azure services, policy flexibility, and total cost of ownership. We also reviewed customer experiences with actual recovery scenarios and how well solutions handle compliance and retention policies. What we found: Azure-native backup works for many organizations, but alternatives offer different trade-offs worth understanding.
Azure VM backup is the practice of taking protected, recoverable copies of the virtual machines you run in Microsoft Azure. Azure operates a shared responsibility model: Microsoft keeps the platform running, but protecting the data inside your VMs against deletion, ransomware, corruption, or a regional outage is your job. Azure's own backup service handles the basics, but many organizations need more: recovery to another region if Azure itself is affected, granular restore of a single file or disk, backups stored independently so ransomware can't reach them, and retention that meets compliance rules. A third-party tool fills those gaps and lets you prove a restore works before you actually need it.
Azure VM backup platforms capture VM disks and application state, typically agentlessly through Azure APIs or with lightweight agents, using changed-block tracking and incremental schedules to keep backup windows and storage low. Application-consistent backups (via VSS on Windows and pre/post scripts on Linux) ensure databases restore cleanly rather than in a crash-consistent state. The differentiators that matter are recovery breadth and speed (granular file or disk restore through instant or quick VM recovery for near-zero RTO), cross-region and off-Azure recovery so a regional outage or tenant compromise doesn't take your backups with it, and immutable or air-gapped copies that survive a ransomware attack on the backup repository. When evaluating, weigh backup frequency against your RPO, whether you can restore outside Azure, how the platform handles Azure-native services like SQL and SAP, and the all-in cost including egress and long-term retention, which native pricing can make hard to predict.
Here is how the 9 platforms compare on the capabilities that matter most for Azure VM backup.
| Product | Best For | Backup Frequency | Immutable Backups | Instant / Quick VM Recovery | Cross-Region Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Datto Backup for Microsoft Azure
|
MSP-managed Azure with tight RPO
|
Hourly (60-min RPO)
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Redstor Powered by CyberSentriq
|
MSPs in regulated industries
|
Scheduled / auto-discover
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Acronis Cyber Protect
|
Consolidated backup and security
|
Continuous / scheduled
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
Azure Backup
|
Azure-native protection
|
Daily
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Commvault Cloud Platform
|
Mission-critical enterprise governance
|
Scheduled + IntelliSnap
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Druva Data Security Cloud
|
Zero-infrastructure cloud backup
|
Scheduled
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
IBM Storage Protect for Cloud Azure
|
Storage efficiency at large data volumes
|
Every 6 hours
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Rubrik Security Cloud
|
Ransomware defense and policy automation
|
Policy-driven (SLA)
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Veeam Backup for Microsoft Azure
|
Broad Azure coverage and hybrid recovery
|
Policy-based
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
We evaluated 9 backup solutions covering backup performance, restore speed and flexibility, multi-region failover capability, compliance policy support, and cost structure, with each product deployed in controlled Azure environments across various VM types and workloads. We combined hands-on testing with market research and customer feedback to validate vendor claims against real-world performance. This guide was written by Caitlin Harris, Deputy Head of Content at Expert Insights, with technical review by Laura Iannini, Cybersecurity Analyst, and is updated quarterly. Read our full methodology
Datto Backup for Microsoft Azure protects Azure workloads with hourly replication and immutable backups stored in the Datto Cloud. We think the tight RPO, daily backup verification, and flat-fee pricing are the features that make this a strong option for MSPs managing client Azure environments. Enterprises running their own Azure infrastructure can use it too, but the multi-tenant design is clearly built with service providers in mind.
Customers report getting protection running quickly after granting admin permissions. Restoring specific snapshots works without complexity, and retention periods are generous. Support quality stands out, with Datto’s team resolving issues fast when errors appear. Something to be aware of is that customers flag monitoring and reporting as needing more granular detail, and some note that costs can increase beyond initial expectations for certain deployments.
We think Datto Backup for Azure fits MSPs protecting multiple Azure tenants or enterprises running significant Azure workloads. The flat-fee pricing and direct access to Datto-certified Azure experts make budget planning easier. If you’re running minimal Azure infrastructure or need to back up platforms beyond Microsoft 365 and Azure VMs, you’ll want something broader.
Redstor Powered by CyberSentriq protects virtual machines running in Microsoft Azure with plug-and-play deployment and instant file recovery. We think the Instant Data recovery and zero egress fees are the strongest selling points for MSPs managing multi-tenant Azure environments. Bundling options for Microsoft 365, Azure Blob, and Entra ID backup extend the coverage from a single console.
Customers praise the well-designed MSP portal, which consolidates backup management across multiple products in a single interface. Redstor brings over 20 years of backup experience, and that depth shows in the flexibility on offer. Something to be aware of is that the platform is primarily designed with service providers in mind, so direct enterprise buyers may find certain workflows less relevant to their environment.
We think Redstor Powered by CyberSentriq works best for ITSPs and MSPs protecting clients in regulated industries like education, legal, and finance. The multi-region storage, audit logs, and automatic data classification support compliance requirements. If you’re a direct enterprise buyer managing your own Azure environment, the MSP-focused design is less relevant to your workflow.
Best for teams consolidating backup and security
Acronis Cyber Protect combines backup, disaster recovery, and endpoint security for Azure VMs in a single agent and console. We think the consolidation play is the real selling point here. If your team is tired of managing separate tools for backup, antimalware, patching, and threat detection, Acronis bundles them into one deployment.
Customers appreciate the unified dashboard for managing both security and backup. MSPs and resellers report straightforward deployment and good technical enablement. Support response times get positive marks, and the interface works well for less technical users. With that said, some customers report that advanced customization requires vendor assistance, and licensing complexity increases when adding extended security modules.
We think Acronis fits organizations that want to reduce tool sprawl by consolidating backup and security under one roof. The single-agent model works well for MSPs selling bundled protection services and enterprises minimizing downtime through unified tooling. If advanced threat hunting is a priority, dedicated XDR tools still go deeper.
Best for organizations already standardized on Azure
Azure Backup is Microsoft’s native cloud backup service for Azure environments, covering VMs, SQL databases, SAP HANA, Azure Files, and on-premises servers through Backup Center. We think this is the natural starting point for organizations already standardized on Azure who want backup without third-party tools. The tight integration with the Azure portal and Site Recovery makes deployment straightforward.
Customers say Azure Backup integrates smoothly with services they already use. Once scheduled, backups run reliably without intervention, and the centralized portal makes managing protection across resources straightforward. Something to be aware of is that pricing complexity across storage tiers, retention policies, and transfer costs requires careful planning. Customers note that long-term retention and large data retrieval incur fees that can catch teams off guard.
We think Azure Backup is the right call for organizations already invested in Azure who want native backup without introducing third-party dependencies. The tight integration with Site Recovery enables coordinated disaster recovery. If you run significant non-Microsoft systems, need faster large-scale restores, or want simpler pricing transparency, alternatives are worth evaluating.
Best for enterprises running mission-critical Azure environments
Commvault Cloud Platform protects Azure workloads with enterprise-grade backup, recovery, and cyber resilience capabilities. We think the zero-trust architecture and bi-directional Microsoft Security integrations are the features that justify evaluation for organizations running mission-critical Azure environments. This is a platform that rewards careful implementation with strong protection.
Customers with long-term deployments report reliable data protection and strong vendor relationships. Support quality stands out for complex implementations, with the team assisting on architecture and ongoing optimization. With that said, initial implementation timelines can stretch longer than expected, and the platform’s depth means new users face a learning curve before they’re comfortable.
We think Commvault fits enterprises running mission-critical Azure workloads that need strong cyber protection and can invest in proper implementation. The platform works well for regulated industries like healthcare, banking, and education that require strict compliance controls. If your team lacks backup architecture expertise or needs simpler deployment, lighter solutions serve you better.
Best for organizations wanting unified protection without managing hardware
Druva Data Security Cloud protects Azure VMs with agentless, cloud-native backup built on AWS infrastructure. We think the zero-infrastructure model and cyber resiliency dashboard are the features that set Druva apart for organizations that want unified protection across Azure, Microsoft 365, and endpoints without managing hardware.
Customers appreciate the straightforward setup and clean dashboard that makes monitoring simple without extensive training. Support quality is strong, with responsive teams that learn your environment and customize solutions. Something to be aware of is that initial backups and large dataset restores run slower than local or appliance-based alternatives, since everything travels over the network to AWS. Customers also note that advanced reporting features are still being refined.
We think Druva fits organizations committed to cloud-native tooling that want unified protection across Microsoft services without managing infrastructure. The zero egress fee model and AWS-backed reliability appeal to cost-conscious teams. If you need fast restores for large datasets or have limited bandwidth, the cloud-only model introduces performance constraints worth factoring in.
Best for enterprises managing large Azure data volumes where storage efficiency matters
IBM Storage Protect for Cloud Azure delivers cloud-based data protection for Entra ID, Azure VMs, and Azure storage services with no on-premises installation required. We think the progressive incremental approach and flexible storage placement are the features that justify evaluation for enterprises managing large Azure data volumes where storage efficiency matters.
Customers value the ability to recover files quickly, including remote access for distributed teams. Automation features work well once configured, and the platform handles compliance requirements effectively. Long-term users report stable performance. Something to be aware of is that initial setup and configuration can be involved, and the first-time user experience presents a steep learning curve.
We think IBM Storage Protect fits enterprises with compliance requirements that value storage efficiency and can invest time in proper implementation. The progressive incremental approach and deduplication make sense for organizations managing large data volumes. If your team needs simple, fast deployment or wants a modern interface out of the box, the complexity may outweigh the benefits.
Best for security-conscious enterprises protecting diverse Azure workloads
Rubrik Security Cloud protects Azure VMs, SQL databases, and Microsoft 365 through policy-driven SLA domains and immutable architecture. We think the automated policy management and ransomware defense are the features that make Rubrik a strong option for security-conscious enterprises protecting diverse Azure workloads.
Customers appreciate the clear, simple interface for setup and monitoring. Fast restore performance stands out, flexible policies adapt to varying business requirements, and support quality is excellent. With that said, enterprise licensing and capacity expansion costs run high for smaller environments. Customers also note that M365 granular recovery capabilities lag behind some alternatives in this category.
We think Rubrik fits mid-market and enterprise organizations that value automated policy management with strong ransomware protection. The immutable architecture and anomaly detection appeal to security-conscious teams. Budget accordingly; this is enterprise-grade protection at enterprise-grade pricing.
Best for mid-market and enterprise teams needing broad Azure protection
Veeam Backup for Microsoft Azure protects Azure VMs, SQL databases, Azure Files, Cosmos DB, and Blob storage through policy-based backups and immutable storage. We think the workload coverage and flexible deployment options are the features that make Veeam a strong default for organizations heavily invested in Azure. The hybrid recovery capabilities set it apart from Azure-native backup.
Customers appreciate the intuitive interface that works for users without advanced technical knowledge. Automated backup processes run reliably, reducing manual errors. Support quality stands out with 24/7 availability, and initial configuration proves straightforward for most deployments. Something to be aware of is that the learning curve for advanced features can be steep, and complex hybrid environments may require additional setup overhead.
We think Veeam Backup for Azure is the right call for mid-market and enterprise organizations that need reliable, broad Azure protection with proven data integrity. The hybrid recovery capabilities and Cosmos DB support go beyond what Azure-native backup offers. If you’re budget-constrained or running minimal Azure workloads, lighter solutions may serve you better.
Azure VM backup is metered in different ways, by protected instance, by data stored, or by restore activity, and egress and long-term retention fees can be hard to predict. Datto stands out with flat-fee pricing; most others quote by environment. The figures below reflect the published model where vendors disclose it; model the all-in cost including egress at your data volume before committing.
| Product | Starting Price | Billing | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Datto Backup for Microsoft Azure
|
Contact for quote
|
Flat-fee, via MSP partners
|
|
|
Redstor Powered by CyberSentriq
|
Contact for quote
|
Per VM, zero egress
|
|
|
Acronis Cyber Protect
|
Contact for quote
|
Per workload + add-on packs
|
|
|
Azure Backup
|
Pay-as-you-go (per instance + storage)
|
Consumption-based
|
|
|
Commvault Cloud Platform
|
Contact for quote
|
Subscription
|
|
|
Druva Data Security Cloud
|
Contact for quote
|
Consumption-based (zero egress)
|
|
|
IBM Storage Protect for Cloud Azure
|
Contact for quote
|
Subscription
|
|
|
Rubrik Security Cloud
|
Contact for quote
|
Subscription
|
|
|
Veeam Backup for Microsoft Azure
|
Contact for quote
|
Per workload / BYOL
|
|
Once you've shortlisted an Azure VM backup platform, these are the steps we recommend to make sure your VMs are protected and recoverable when Azure itself is affected.
Confirm whether you can protect individual VMs, whole resource groups, and application-consistent state, and that incremental backups are supported.
Daily native backups leave up to 24 hours of exposure, while hourly or six-hourly schedules shrink the data-loss window for critical VMs.
If a regional outage or tenant compromise hits Azure, cross-region failover or off-Azure recovery is what keeps you running.
VSS or guest-level quiescing ensures SQL, SAP, and similar workloads restore cleanly rather than in a crash-consistent state.
Confirm you can restore at the level you actually need, and to different VM types or storage accounts where required.
Recovery points an attacker cannot delete, ideally isolated from your Azure tenant, are essential to surviving a ransomware attack on the repository.
Azure-native and consumption pricing can surprise teams with retrieval and egress fees, so flat-fee or zero-egress models are worth weighing at scale.
Regulated workloads need enforced retention, the ability to lock backups against deletion, and audit logs to demonstrate it.
Confirm coverage for SQL, SAP, Cosmos DB, or other workloads on your VMs, plus integration with Backup Vault or Site Recovery if you use them.
A backup that completes is not the same as one that restores, so rehearse VM recovery, including cross-region, to confirm RTOs hold.
Azure VM backup requires matching protection to your recovery requirements and compliance obligations. No single platform fits every organization.
Azure Backup is the natural starting point for organizations comfortable with Azure-native tooling; it integrates directly into the portal and Site Recovery, though pricing across tiers and retention takes planning.
Veeam Backup for Microsoft Azure is the pick when you need quick VM recovery, broad workload coverage including Cosmos DB, and hybrid restore outside Azure for ransomware resilience.
For MSPs, Datto Backup for Microsoft Azure offers a tight 60-minute RPO with predictable flat-fee pricing, while Redstor Powered by CyberSentriq adds instant file recovery and zero egress fees for service providers in regulated industries.
Acronis Cyber Protect consolidates backup and security in one agent; Commvault Cloud Platform delivers enterprise governance, air-gapped isolation, and compliance reporting for mission-critical workloads; and Rubrik Security Cloud centers immutable, policy-driven protection with anomaly detection.
Druva Data Security Cloud suits teams that want zero-infrastructure, cloud-native protection across Azure and Microsoft 365, and IBM Storage Protect for Cloud Azure rewards enterprises that prioritize storage efficiency at large data volumes. Read the individual reviews above to match a solution to your recovery time objectives, compliance requirements, and multi-region failover needs.
A VM backup solution is a cybersecurity product or service that creates copies of a VM’s data, configuration, and operating state to protect against data loss, corruption, or system failure. These copies, i.e., “backups”, can include the entire VM image (full backup), changes that have been made to the VM since the last full backup (incremental backup), or just selected files and folders.
While they may offer slightly different feature sets, most VM backup solutions typically follow the same workflow: first, they take a snapshot of the VM’s disk, often using features like VSS (Volume Shadow Copy Service) for Windows or pre/post scripts for Linux to ensure the consistency of your applications.
They then write these snapshots out to a in secure storage facility, often in a different location (region or availability zone).
Then, if your data is lost or stolen, you can restore the entire VM, specific files, or even recover data to a different region or subscription, helping ensure business continuity with minimal downtime.
Azure VM backup solutions provide safeguard against data loss caused by hardware failures, accidental deletion, malware attacks, or system crashes by making sure that you always have a reliable, secure spare copy of your data, and allowing you to quickly and effectively recover those copies should you need to. By enabling you to restore entire virtual machines or specific data, Azure VM backup tools help you maintain productivity and minimize the impact of unexpected disruptions.
They can also help you achieve compliance with data protection regulations by enabling you to define retention policies and securely store your data, often with encryption and access controls.
Further reading on backup and recovery from Expert Insights — buyers' guides, comparison articles, and platform-specific shortlists.
Joel is the Director of Content and a co-founder at Expert Insights; a rapidly growing media company focussed on covering cybersecurity solutions.
He’s an experienced journalist and editor with 8 years’ experience covering the cybersecurity space. He’s reviewed hundreds of cybersecurity solutions, interviewed hundreds of industry experts and produced dozens of industry reports read by thousands of CISOs and security professionals in topics like IAM, MFA, zero trust, email security, DevSecOps and more.
He also hosts the Expert Insights Podcast and co-writes the weekly newsletter, Decrypted. Joel is driven to share his team’s expertise with cybersecurity leaders to help them create more secure business foundations.
Laura Iannini is a Cybersecurity Analyst at Expert Insights. With deep cybersecurity knowledge and strong research skills, she leads Expert Insights’ product testing team, conducting thorough tests of product features and in-depth industry analysis to ensure that Expert Insights’ product reviews are definitive and insightful.
Laura also carries out wider analysis of vendor landscapes and industry trends to inform Expert Insights’ enterprise cybersecurity buyers’ guides, covering topics such as security awareness training, cloud backup and recovery, email security, and network monitoring. Prior to working at Expert Insights, Laura worked as a Senior Information Security Engineer at Constant Edge, where she tested cybersecurity solutions, carried out product demos, and provided high-quality ongoing technical support.
Laura holds a Bachelor’s degree in Cybersecurity from the University of West Florida.