Technical Review by
Laura Iannini
Endpoint detection and response feels straightforward until you’re actually deploying it. You need to see threats in real time, respond faster than attackers escalate, and do this across hundreds or thousands of endpoints without crushing your infrastructure or driving up false positives.
The real problem isn’t finding a tool that detects malware. The problem is finding one that surfaces threats faster than your team can actually respond to them, integrates smoothly into your existing security stack, and doesn’t require hiring additional analysts just to tune out the noise. Get it wrong, and you end up with alert fatigue that actually degrades security.
We evaluated 11 EDR and XDR platforms across Windows, macOS, and Linux environments, evaluating each for detection speed, false positive rates, investigation capabilities, integration depth, and deployment ease. We examined how each handles ransomware, alongside lateral movement and privilege escalation. We also reviewed how teams actually use them in production and where implementations stumble.
Your choice depends on whether you prefer unified bundled protection, managed threat hunting, or automated policy-driven response. ESET PROTECT Enterprise bundles endpoint protection, full disk encryption, and threat detection under a single console. Huntress Managed EDR pairs always-on monitoring with a 24/7 human-staffed SOC that hunts threats and handles response. ThreatLocker Detect uses policy-based monitoring and automated remediation to catch unusual endpoint activity without manual intervention. Cisco Secure Endpoint uses machine learning and Talos Intelligence to detect, isolate, and respond to endpoint threats across mid-to-large enterprises. CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR extends an EDR foundation into cross-domain detection, correlating threats across endpoints, cloud, and identity systems with MITRE ATT&CK mapping.
Endpoint detection and response (EDR) is security software that monitors laptops, desktops, servers, and other devices for suspicious activity. Unlike traditional antivirus, which blocks known malware using signature databases, EDR watches what programs actually do on the endpoint and flags behavior that looks like an attack. When it detects a threat, it can automatically isolate the device, kill the malicious process, and alert your security team. Extended detection and response (XDR) builds on EDR by pulling in signals from email, identity, cloud, and network sources for broader visibility.
EDR agents collect continuous telemetry from endpoints: process creation events, file system changes, registry modifications, network connections, and memory operations. This telemetry feeds behavioral analysis engines that match activity sequences against known attack techniques, typically mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework. When detection logic triggers, the platform can execute automated response actions including process termination, endpoint isolation, file quarantine, and in some cases full system rollback to a pre-attack state.
Investigation capabilities let analysts query historical telemetry, reconstruct attack timelines through process trees and event chains, and correlate activity across multiple endpoints. XDR extends this model by ingesting third-party telemetry from email gateways, identity providers, cloud workloads, and network sensors, correlating cross-domain signals to surface attacks that span multiple vectors.
A high-level comparison of the 11 EDR and XDR platforms reviewed in this guide.
| Product | Best For | Type | MITRE ATT&CK | Ransomware Rollback | Managed Hunting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ESET PROTECT Enterprise
|
Bundled XDR with encryption
|
XDR
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Huntress Managed EDR
|
Managed hunting without internal SOC
|
Managed EDR
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
ThreatLocker Detect
|
Policy-driven automated response
|
EDR
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Acronis Cyber Protect (with EDR)
|
Integrated EDR with built-in backup and one-click rollback
|
EDR
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Cisco Secure Endpoint
|
Cisco ecosystem enterprises
|
EDR
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR
|
Cross-domain threat correlation
|
XDR
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
Heimdal EDR
|
Consolidating EDR, PAM, and patching
|
EDR
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
|
Microsoft 365 and Azure environments
|
XDR
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Palo Alto Cortex XDR
|
Enterprise investigation and analytics
|
XDR
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
SentinelOne Singularity XDR
|
Automated remediation with rollback
|
XDR
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Sophos Intercept X Endpoint
|
Mid-market ransomware protection
|
EDR
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
Expert Insights evaluated 11 EDR and XDR platforms across Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints, assessing detection accuracy, false positive rates, automated response capabilities, investigation tools, and deployment complexity. This guide was researched and written by Caitlin Harris and technically reviewed by Laura Iannini. Read our full methodology
ESET is a market-leading provider of lightweight, highly effective cybersecurity solutions designed to protect both consumers and enterprises against known and zero-day threats. ESET PROTECT Enterprise is their extended detection and response (XDR) platform, combining endpoint security, full disk encryption, file server security, proactive threat detection, and facilitated response. We think it’s a strong fit for mid-sized to larger organizations that want XDR, encryption, and endpoint protection under a single console.
We think ESET PROTECT Enterprise is a strong solution for mid-sized to larger organizations looking to protect their endpoints and extended network against known and zero-day threats. Existing users praise the solution for its friendly interface and powerful forensic analysis capabilities, as well as its ability to adjust alert sensitivity automatically to reduce false positives. The public API integration with SIEM and SOAR tools makes deployment into existing security stacks straightforward.
Huntress offers a fully managed EDR solution that delivers endpoint security to detect and respond to attacks like ransomware and infostealers, backed by a 24/7 AI-assisted SOC staffed with industry-recognized analysts and threat hunters. We think the focus on hacker tradecraft, including persistent footholds, privilege escalation, lateral movement, and ransomware detection, addresses the gaps where traditional antivirus often fails. Managed EDR supports Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints with OS-specific agents and threat detections.
We think Huntress Managed EDR is a strong option for organizations of all sizes that need EDR technology, threat experts, and 24/7 detection and response without the overhead of staffing a team of threat experts and building an internal SOC. It’s also a good fit for Microsoft Defender users who want a highly complementary EDR solution. The hands-on SOC team hunts and stops threats, giving you critical alerts rather than a flood of noise to triage.
ThreatLocker Detect is an EDR solution that provides automated policy-based monitoring, alerting, and remediation when unusual endpoint activity is identified. We think it works best as part of the broader ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform, where the combination of application allowlisting, Ringfencing, and storage control creates layered defense that most standalone EDR tools can’t match.
We think ThreatLocker Detect delivers the most value when paired with the rest of the Zero Trust platform. The policy-driven approach gives you granular control that behavioral-only EDR tools lack. The admin console is intuitive and well designed, and configuring policies and controlling applications for end users is straightforward. If your team wants a prevention-first EDR with strong automated remediation, ThreatLocker Detect is well worth considering.
Acronis Cyber Protect is a security and backup suite with fully featured endpoint management alongside an integrated enterprise-level backup and recovery platform covering 30+ workloads. This means that all of your endpoint devices are backed up, with one-click rollback features to defend against ransomware attacks on your endpoints.
Acronis Cyber Protect is delivered via a single agent with a single admin console. There are two versions, one for direct purchase and another for service providers (Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud). The EDR solution earns a place on this list due to its AI-powered attack chain investigation maps, instant response capabilities and triple A rating for EDR detection. It’s a strong fit for teams looking for endpoint security with built-in endpoint backup delivered in one agent.
Acronis offers a powerful EDR with native backup capabilities. This approach is highly advantageous, as if your devices were to be compromised by malware, you can immediately roll-back to a safe version. This is a strong reason to consider the platform if you are in a regulated industry or consider ransomware to be a major business risk.
The core EDR capabilities are strong. Acronis offers highly rated, award winning AI-enhanced behavioral heuristic antivirus, anti-malware, anti-ransomware and anti-cryptojacking technologies. There are AI generated incident summaries and attack path mapping to help you quickly contain incidents. We think it’s a strong fit for businesses that want endpoint security and backup consolidated without managing multiple agents.
Best for enterprises already running Cisco security infrastructure
Cisco Secure Endpoint is cloud-native EDR powered by Cisco Talos, one of the largest commercial threat intelligence operations in the world. We think this is the natural EDR choice for organizations already running Cisco security infrastructure, where the native integration with firewalls, Umbrella, and Duo extends detection without adding standalone management overhead.
Customers say detection depth and early threat visibility are strong points. The platform runs quietly without disruptive notifications, and initial agent setup is straightforward. Integration with other Cisco security tools extends coverage cleanly. Some users report that the management console feels complex, particularly for investigations and policy creation. Customers also note that reporting and dashboards lack the visual depth needed for quick insight extraction.
We think Cisco Secure Endpoint fits mid-to-large enterprises with dedicated security teams, especially those already running Cisco infrastructure. The Talos intelligence backing is a genuine advantage. If you need a simple, self-service EDR or run a multi-vendor security stack, the complexity and ecosystem dependency may not be worth it.
Best for cross-domain threat correlation and fast triage
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR delivers extended detection and response through a single lightweight agent that covers Windows, macOS, Chrome OS, and Linux. We think this is one of the strongest EDR platforms for organizations that need cross-domain threat correlation and fast triage, backed by CrowdStrike’s cloud-native architecture and rapid threat intelligence updates.
Customers say the platform runs quietly and protects endpoints without noticeable performance impact. The centralized console makes monitoring large endpoint fleets manageable, and support gets consistent praise for responsiveness. Some users report that advanced features feel overwhelming initially, and onboarding takes longer than expected across large deployments. Customers also note that endpoint offboarding from the console is not always immediate or well-automated.
We think Falcon Insight XDR fits security teams that want deep visibility and fast triage without managing multiple agents. The MITRE mapping and behavioral analytics are genuine differentiators for investigation speed. Budget the licensing carefully, as pricing places it out of reach for smaller organizations.
Best for consolidating EDR, PAM, patching, and DNS filtering
Heimdal EDR bundles next-gen antivirus, privileged access management, application control, patch management, DNS filtering, and encryption into a single platform. We think this suits organizations tired of managing separate tools for each security function, where the consolidation value outweighs the trade-off of individual module depth against best-of-breed alternatives.
Customers say deployment runs smoothly and the platform catches threats that previous antivirus solutions missed. The central console gets praise for clear analytics that help quantify organizational risk. Support earns positive marks for resolving issues quickly. Customer feedback for this product is limited in depth. Available reviews focus on deployment ease and general satisfaction but lack detail on edge cases or performance under load.
We think Heimdal EDR works best for organizations that want to reduce vendor sprawl across endpoint protection, PAM, and patching. The breadth is genuine, though individual modules may not match dedicated tools in their category. If consolidation and operational simplicity are your priorities, Heimdal delivers.
Best for organizations committed to Microsoft 365 and Azure
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is Microsoft’s EDR platform covering Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, and IoT devices. We think this delivers the most value for organizations already committed to Microsoft 365 and Azure, where native integration eliminates the connector overhead and policy fragmentation that comes with third-party EDR tools.
Customers say the Microsoft ecosystem integration is the strongest selling point, with unified investigation across endpoints, identities, cloud apps, and email. Setup runs smoothly for teams already familiar with Microsoft tooling. Automated response capabilities get consistent praise. Some users report that policy management spans Entra, Intune, Defender, and Purview, creating confusion about where settings live. Customers also note that detection quality on macOS and Linux still trails the Windows experience.
We think Defender for Endpoint makes the most sense paired with the broader Defender XDR suite inside a Microsoft-committed environment. The signal volume and cross-service correlation are genuine advantages. If you run a mixed environment or need consistent detection across all operating systems, evaluate the platform gaps on non-Windows endpoints.
Best for enterprise investigation and alert management
Palo Alto Cortex XDR correlates endpoint, network, and cloud telemetry to detect and respond to advanced threats from a single platform. We think this is one of the most capable EDR/XDR platforms available, backed by strong independent test results. Cortex XDR achieved 99% in both threat prevention and detection in the 2025 AV-Comparatives EPR evaluation and claims to eliminate up to 99.6% of alert noise.
Customers say the platform reliably detects advanced threats including malware, ransomware, and targeted attacks. Integration with native Palo Alto tools works smoothly, and endpoint setup is straightforward with real-time alerting. Some users report that tuning policies and customizing detections involves a steep learning curve. Customers also note that false positives on common applications require early attention and manual adjustment.
We think Cortex XDR fits enterprise teams with dedicated analysts who can invest time in tuning and configuration. The alert grouping and visual investigation tools are genuine operational wins. If your team lacks the bandwidth for upfront optimization or you’re working with a tight budget, the complexity and cost may outweigh the benefits.
Best for automated remediation with rollback without 24/7 SOC coverage
SentinelOne Singularity XDR uses behavioral AI to detect and remediate threats across Windows, macOS, Linux, and IoT devices. We think the automated remediation with rollback is a genuine differentiator for teams that lack 24/7 SOC coverage, and the Storyline feature eliminates the manual timeline reconstruction that eats investigation hours.
Customers say the platform makes threat detection clearer, with alert context that speeds up response. Smaller security teams praise centralized visibility across endpoint, network, cloud, and identity telemetry. Alert correlation reduces fatigue by surfacing real incidents over noise. Customer feedback is largely positive but light on specific friction points, which makes it harder to assess real-world operational challenges during evaluation.
We think SentinelOne fits organizations wanting automated detection and response without heavy analyst overhead. The Storyline visualization and rollback capabilities reduce time-to-resolution significantly. If you need granular control over detection tuning or the deepest possible forensic tools, dedicated EDR platforms may offer more flexibility.
Best for mid-market organizations wanting AI-driven detection with ransomware rollback
Sophos Intercept X Endpoint uses deep learning AI to detect threats and provides automated ransomware recovery with file rollback. We think this is a strong fit for mid-market organizations that want AI-driven protection with built-in ransomware response, especially those already running Sophos firewalls where Synchronized Security coordinates endpoint and firewall response in real time.
Customers say detection is sharp and the Sophos Central console is clean and intuitive. Teams praise deployment ease and integration with existing tools. The Intercept X engine gets strong marks for catching threats that previous solutions missed. Some users report that scans slow down older hardware, especially with large files. Customers also note that false positives on legitimate applications require manual whitelisting by IT staff.
We think Intercept X fits mid-market organizations that want AI-driven detection with built-in ransomware rollback and don’t want to manage multiple point solutions. The Sophos ecosystem extensibility pays off if you’re already in the Sophos world. If you need tight integration with non-Sophos tools or run a lot of legacy hardware, factor those limitations into your evaluation.
Beyond our top 11, these endpoint detection and response platforms are worth considering.
Offers endpoint protection with EDR capabilities, focused on threat prevention, detection, and response.
Offers a suite of endpoint protection, including detection and response capabilities.
An endpoint security solution that includes EDR capabilities to enhance threat detection and response.
EDR and XDR pricing varies significantly based on endpoint count, feature tier, and contract length. Several platforms operate on a quote-based model, and volume discounts are common at higher endpoint thresholds. The prices below reflect publicly available starting points where possible.
| Product | Starting Price | Billing | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ESET PROTECT Enterprise
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
Huntress Managed EDR
|
$8.99/endpoint/mo
|
Monthly
|
|
|
ThreatLocker Detect
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
Acronis Cyber Protect
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
Cisco Secure Endpoint
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR
|
From $184.99/device/yr (Enterprise)
|
Annual
|
|
|
Heimdal EDR
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
|
From $5.20/user/mo (Plan 2)
|
Annual
|
|
|
Palo Alto Cortex XDR
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
|
SentinelOne Singularity XDR
|
From $69.99/endpoint/yr (Core)
|
Annual
|
|
|
Sophos Intercept X Endpoint
|
Contact for quote
|
Annual
|
|
These are the configuration and operational steps we recommend when evaluating and deploying EDR and XDR platforms.
Your threat model determines whether you need deep forensic investigation, automated remediation, or managed hunting, and that decision shapes every shortlist.
Some platforms detect significantly better on Windows than macOS or Linux; verify coverage matches your actual endpoint fleet before committing.
High false positive rates drive alert fatigue that degrades security posture faster than missing a detection tool entirely.
Automated isolation and remediation should align with your existing playbooks, not create new workflow gaps or disrupt production.
Advanced forensic capabilities only help if your analysts can use them; managed options may be more effective for leaner teams.
EDR platforms that connect to your SIEM, SOAR, and identity systems provide faster triage and correlated investigation context.
Test agent performance impact on production workloads before full deployment to avoid disruption across your fleet.
Factor in onboarding, tuning, training, and any managed service add-ons when comparing pricing across vendors.
Longer telemetry retention improves investigation depth but adds storage costs that vary significantly between vendors.
Track mean time to detect and respond before and after EDR deployment to measure the actual security improvement you're getting.
EDR and XDR platforms differ significantly in approach. Your choice depends on team size, security maturity, and whether you prioritize automation or investigation depth.
For lightweight enterprise XDR with strong triage, CrowdStrike Falcon Insight XDR delivers on a single agent. MITRE mapping speeds investigation. Real-time containment actions move fast during incidents.
If automated remediation is your priority and analyst availability is constrained, SentinelOne Singularity XDR detects, isolates, remediates, and rolls back without waiting. Storyline technology visualizes attacks. Three tiers let you match capabilities to your needs.
For teams fully committed to Microsoft 365 and Azure, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint processes 78 trillion daily signals and correlates threats across your entire stack. Best value paired with the broader Defender XDR suite.
If deep investigation and cross-telemetry correlation matter most, Palo Alto Cortex XDR excels. Alert grouping and visual attack chain analysis reduce analyst friction. Best for enterprise teams with dedicated forensics capability.
For MSPs and lean teams wanting managed detection without internal staffing, Huntress Managed EDR pairs 24/7 human hunting with low false positives. Pre-built RMM scripts deploy same-day.
Read the individual reviews above for deployment specifics, detection capabilities, and the trade-offs that matter for your environment.
Endpoint detection and response (EDR) is a type of software solution that enables IT and security teams to identify endpoint threats such as malware, viruses, fileless attacks and the misuse of legitimate applications—be that malicious or mistaken. But not only do EDR security solutions help organizations to detect these threats; they also help them to remediate security incidents and analyze them, to help prevent the same thing from happening in the future.
81% of businesses have experienced an attack involving some sort of malware, and 53% of organizations were hit by a successful ransomware attack in the last year alone. It’s clear that organizations need to protect their endpoints against threats such as these, and implementing an EDR tool is one of the ways in which they can do that.
Endpoint detection and response solutions enable IT and security teams to more efficiently identify malicious activity across their organizations’ endpoints, and then quickly and effectively remediate that activity.
EDR solutions monitor each endpoint—be it a desktop, laptop, mobile device, cloud system or server—in real-time for suspicious or unusual behavior that could indicate the system has been compromised. When a threat is detected, the solution can either initiate a response automatically to contain and remediate the threat, or provide suggestions to the security team to help inform their manual threat response processes. The level of automated remediation available varies from solution to solution, and is usually configurable so that system admins can integrate the platform’s remediation actions with the organization’s existing security tools and workflows.
As well as helping organizations to identify and respond to threats, many EDR tools also offer threat intelligence functionality, which helps security teams work out exactly how each threat entered their system and what actions allowed it to spread. This enables them to fix the root cause of the problem and prevent repeat attacks.
EDR solutions monitor a company’s endpoints—including desktops, laptops, mobile devices, cloud systems, and servers— in real-time for anomalous behavior that might indicate that the endpoint has been breached. When the solution detects anomalous or malicious activity, it either automatically responds to it as per admin-configured remediation workflows, or it alerts admins to the activity so that they can respond to it manually.
Some EDR products also offer threat intelligence features. These help SOC teams to identify the root cause of the attack so that they can fix the vulnerability and prevent any repeat attacks in the future.
There is a, seemingly, endless list of acronyms in the world of cybersecurity, so it is worth breaking down how EDR is different to MDR and EPP:
EDR solutions allow businesses to identify endpoint threats such as viruses, malware, fileless attacks, the use of illegitimate applications, and the misuse of legitimate applications. They also help you to remediate threats and provide in-depth analysis on how each incident began and spread, so that you can take steps to prevent future attacks.
Endpoint attacks are some of the most common threats—and in the case of ransomware, the most expensive—that business today are facing, so it’s important that you’re able to identify and remediate them when they do occur. Due to their frequency and severity, we recommend that every business invest in some type of endpoint security solution. However, you need to analyze the needs of your business when choosing which type of solution to go for.
If you don’t have too many endpoints to manage and your team has sufficient resource to respond efficiently to any incidents that they’re alerted to, then you may just want an endpoint protection platform.
If you have a large network with a diverse range of endpoints to monitor, and a security team that can dedicate their time to threat monitoring and incident response, you may wish to consider an EDR tool.
If you don’t have the in-house resource to investigate alerts and conduct incident response, however big or small your endpoint fleet is, an MDR solution might be better suited to your needs.
There are five key features that you should look out for when choosing an EDR solution:
This is the “D” in “EDR”. Once you’ve deployed your EDR tool, it should use machine learning and behavioral analytics to create a baseline of “normal” activity for each endpoint, including user interactions such as logins and process executions. The EDR solution can then use this baseline to highlight any anomalous (and therefore potentially malicious) activity across your endpoints. If an EDR solution can’t do this effectively, it isn’t an EDR solution.
There are several ways in which an EDR tool can offer incident response. “Guided remediation” usually means that the solution will give your SOC team suggestions on how to respond to a threat. “Automated incident response” usually means that your SOC team can create incident response workflows that enable the platform to automatically remediate or contain certain types of threat on your behalf. “Managed threat hunting” usually means that the EDR provider will also offer you a dedicated SOC team that will guide your own in-house team through the entire incident response process—though this often comes at an additional cost.
No matter what your solution’s level of automated incident response is, it needs to alert your security team to any incidents it discovers. The best solutions also triage these alerts, so that your team knows which ones they need to prioritize. Ultimately, this helps them to reduce their mean-time-to-respond (MTTR) and the overall damage caused by the attack.
This is one of the biggest differences between EDR and EPP solutions: an EDR solution should use the behavioral data it’s collected to create a full trail of the attacker’s activities within your network. This begins at the moment the account was breached, and all of their movements after that. This can help you prevent future breaches of the same nature and fix any vulnerabilities that enabled the attack to spread.
The best EDR tools not only provide powerful protection but make it easy for your team to manage that protection by offering a user-friendly interface and high levels of customization. This not only enables security teams to gain clearer visibility into their endpoint data, but also to fine-tune the solution to their environment, which can help reduce false positives.
Some of the common threats identified by EDR security solutions are listed below.
Multi-Stage Attacks
As an EDR solution collects endpoint data from across your entire network, it has complete visibility into the threats you face. It can correlate data and events that seem isolated and benign on their own. When taken together, EDR can uncover evidence of multi-stage attack patterns. This might include evidence of “reconnaissance”, where a series of smaller breaches are used to probe a network and find vulnerabilities. By identifying these indicators early, an attack can be prevented before it comes to fruition, thereby keeping you safer.
Zero-Day Threats
The term “zero-day threat” is used to describe a threat that has never been seen before. As such, there is no predefined route to respond to the threat. In these cases, EDR solutions must react proactively to isolate the threat from the wider network and monitor behavior to identify the best way to resolve it. It is important to ensure that the threat has not replicated or hidden, and that the threat is fully resolved.
Fileless Malware
Fileless malware is a form of malware attack that does not require any new software to be installed on a user’s device in order to carry out the attack. It will modify native, legitimate tools and software on the user’s device. As there is no malicious code being installed, legacy AV, sandboxing, and allow-listing tools may struggle to detect fileless malware. Attackers may use exploit kits, memory-only malware, or stolen credentials to gain access to a device.
It is essential that an EDR solution gathers as much data as possible and analyzes it in an effective way. This ensures that it can provide comprehensive network coverage and respond at the earliest sign of a threat. Understanding how the threat entered your network, and predicting its future movements through behavioral analysis, can help to ensure that remediation efforts are targeted and effective.
With this data ingested and analyzed, EDR is able to perform effective remediation.
Further reading on endpoint security from Expert Insights — buyers' guides, comparison articles, and platform-specific shortlists.
Caitlin Harris is the Deputy Head of Content at Expert Insights. As an experienced content writer and editor, Caitlin helps cybersecurity leaders to cut through the noise in the cybersecurity space with expert analysis and insightful recommendations.
Prior to Expert Insights, Caitlin worked at QA Ltd, where she produced award-winning technical training materials, and she has also produced journalistic content over the course of her career.
Caitlin has 8 years of experience in the cybersecurity and technology space, helping technical teams, CISOs, and security professionals find clarity on complex, mission critical topics like security awareness training, backup and recovery, and endpoint protection.
Caitlin also hosts the Expert Insights Podcast and co-writes the weekly newsletter, Decrypted.
Laura Iannini is a Cybersecurity Analyst at Expert Insights. With deep cybersecurity knowledge and strong research skills, she leads Expert Insights’ product testing team, conducting thorough tests of product features and in-depth industry analysis to ensure that Expert Insights’ product reviews are definitive and insightful.
Laura also carries out wider analysis of vendor landscapes and industry trends to inform Expert Insights’ enterprise cybersecurity buyers’ guides, covering topics such as security awareness training, cloud backup and recovery, email security, and network monitoring. Prior to working at Expert Insights, Laura worked as a Senior Information Security Engineer at Constant Edge, where she tested cybersecurity solutions, carried out product demos, and provided high-quality ongoing technical support.
Laura holds a Bachelor’s degree in Cybersecurity from the University of West Florida.