Technical Review by
Laura Iannini
Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) platforms automate incident response workflows and execute playbooks across integrated security tools — reducing analyst workload for routine response while supporting human-led investigation for complex incidents. SOAR is valuable when the automation it provides reduces workload net of the complexity it introduces. We reviewed 10 platforms and found How We Chose the Top SOAR Solutions, Cyware SOAR, and Devo SOAR to be the strongest on playbook sophistication and integration breadth.
Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) tools help organizations coordinate and automate their event analysis and incident response processes.
The Challenge: Between an IT skills shortage, an overwhelming number of IT and security solutions to manage, and an increasing attack surface, IT and security teams have a lot of plates to juggle. Unfortunately, it can be easy to let one slip.
SOAR tools alleviate some of this pressure by automating and aligning already-established processes for threat detection and automating repetitive response processes for common security challenges.
How SOAR Works: A SOAR tool aggregates security and event data from across the network. It then analyzes that data using machine learning to identify cyberthreats, notifying your SOC team of any high-risk activity it discovers via triaged, prioritized alerts.
Most SOAR tools offer two remediation options: they can guide your SOC team through remediation workflows, or automatically remediate more simple threats using response playbooks configured by the SOC team.
In this article, we’ll highlight:
We handpicked these SOAR solutions by evaluating their ability to streamline threat detection and response, focusing on automation, integration, and usability. We conducted hands-on testing and analyzed user feedback from online sources, ensuring they suit businesses from startups to enterprises. Here are the five key features we examined:
With these features in focus, we’ve selected the top Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response solutions for 2026 to empower your SOC and combat cyber threats effectively. Let’s dive in!
Cyware SOAR is a vendor-neutral orchestration platform built for enterprise security teams that need to automate threat response at scale. It connects detection, investigation, and response across your security stack from one interface, with particular strength in phishing analysis, malware management, and incident response workflows. We think it’s a strong fit for organizations with established SOC processes and the headcount to build and maintain playbooks over time.
The platform ships with over 100 pre-built playbook templates and a drag-and-drop builder for custom automation. Cyware’s App Marketplace now includes over 400 integrations, covering mixed-vendor environments where manual handoffs between tools slow everything down. AI-powered capabilities include a playbook builder that generates workflows from natural language, a custom code generator, and a playbook debugger that identifies failures and provides step-by-step fixes, which is good to see. A lightweight agent covers both cloud and on-premises deployments, so teams keep the same workflows regardless of where workloads sit.
Users praise the no-code automation approach for lowering the barrier to building workflows without writing custom scripts. The MITRE ATT&CK framework alignment gets positive marks from teams that want structure around their detection and response logic. With that said, some available customer feedback covers related Cyware products rather than SOAR directly, which makes SOAR-specific validation harder. Where it overlaps, customers highlight support for custom integrations in multiple programming languages when native options fall short.
We think Cyware SOAR suits organizations with mature SOC operations and the resources to build and maintain playbooks. Cyware reports that the platform reduces manual security tasks by 80% through automated workflows, which is impressive. Leaner teams or early-stage security programs will get less value from the platform’s depth without dedicated SOC resources.
Devo SOAR is an intelligence-driven platform built for enterprise SOC teams managing high data volumes. The differentiator is HyperStream, a real-time analytics engine with a columnar architecture that handles large datasets without the performance degradation common in high-volume environments. We think it’s a strong option for enterprise teams where alert volume is the core operational problem.
Devo SOAR connects with over 300 preconfigured integrations, covering the core of a modern security stack. The no-code playbook builder lets SOC teams move fast without pulling in engineering resources every time a workflow changes. Alert triaging and case management run through the same interface, keeping investigation workflows tight. HyperStream drives real-time analytics across high data volumes, delivering faster mean time to detect and response metrics, which is a meaningful advantage for teams handling concurrent incidents at scale.
Something to be aware of is that available customer feedback covers Devo’s broader platform rather than SOAR specifically, which limits what we can validate on SOAR directly. Where feedback does cross over, customers say the platform is straightforward to learn. Users flag support quality and training resources as areas needing improvement, particularly for teams without prior Devo experience.
We think Devo SOAR works best for enterprise teams running high-volume environments where real-time analytics is a priority. The HyperStream architecture directly addresses that scaling challenge. For smaller teams or those without SOC maturity, the platform’s depth requires meaningful investment to unlock. Devo has been shipping significant product updates throughout 2024 and 2025, including expanded content libraries and deeper autonomous detection-and-response capabilities.
FortiSOAR targets global enterprises and MSSPs that need to orchestrate security operations across complex, multi-tenant environments. The FortiGuard threat intelligence integration gives it a native intelligence layer that standalone SOAR platforms lack. We think it’s one of the strongest options for organizations already operating within the Fortinet ecosystem or MSSPs managing security operations across multiple clients.
FortiSOAR now offers over 650 connectors and integrations with 500+ multi-vendor security products, including SIEMs, EDRs, and ticketing systems. The platform includes 7,700+ out-of-the-box playbooks with a Visual Playbook Designer that supports drag-and-drop workflow building, Python code execution, versioning, and crash recovery. Multi-tenant and shared-tenant deployment options give enterprise and MSSP teams real architecture flexibility, with clean data separation across client environments. FortiAI provides generative AI assistance for playbook creation and incident summarization, which is good to see.
Users report measurable improvements to incident response speed, with faster mean time to detect consistently cited. The multi-tenant architecture gets positive marks for environments requiring cross-platform automation at scale. With that said, dashboard functionality draws some criticism; customers flag that SOC and NOC visibility features need improvement. Some users also note that third-party integration coverage can feel limited for specific tools, despite the broad connector count.
We think FortiSOAR makes the most sense for organizations already in the Fortinet ecosystem, or MSSPs managing multiple client environments. The FortiGuard intelligence layer and multi-tenant architecture are real differentiators. Mobile app alerts keep teams informed when they’re away from a workstation, which is a nice touch. If your organization runs a lean, single-tenant SOC, the platform’s depth adds cost without proportional return.
Google Security Operations SOAR runs on Google Cloud infrastructure and covers detection, investigation, and response with no-code playbook automation and unified case management. We think it’s a strong choice for organizations already invested in the Google Cloud ecosystem, or MSPs managing large, complex client environments where the platform’s data handling and automation depth can be fully utilized.
Case management handles alert ingestion, grouping, prioritization, assignment, and investigation from a single interface. We found the no-code playbook builder strong for teams that need consistent automation without building engineering dependencies into every workflow. The platform orchestrates over 300 tools, covering EDRs, identity management, and network security. Root cause analysis sits at the center of the investigation workflow, backed by integrated threat intelligence. In 2026, Google introduced a Triage Investigative Agent powered by agentic AI to help automate security investigations, which is good to see. Dashboards now natively integrate SOAR data, with case history and playbook data queryable using YARA-L.
Users praise fast search and analysis across massive data volumes, with scalability consistently cited as a core strength. Centralized detection and investigation noticeably speeds up incident response. With that said, cost and support draw the most criticism. Customers flag pricing as high, and slower support responses create frustration when urgent issues need resolution. Teams new to Google Cloud services also face a steeper learning curve during onboarding.
We think Google Security Operations SOAR works best for teams ready to operate at scale within the Google Cloud ecosystem. The data handling capabilities and no-code automation are genuinely impressive at volume. If your team is still building out its security operations, the pricing and learning curve are factors leadership needs to weigh carefully before committing.
IBM QRadar SOAR is an enterprise incident response platform that centralizes alerts, walks analysts through response workflows with in-app guidance, and integrates tightly with the wider IBM security stack. We think it makes the most sense for organizations already running QRadar SIEM, where the native integration creates a streamlined workflow from offense detection to resolution.
The platform ships with pre-packaged playbooks and in-app guidance that speed up analyst decisions during active incidents. We found the artifact extraction feature practical; it pulls IP addresses and URLs from QRadar offenses directly into case files, cutting manual data entry during triage. Over 300 enterprise-grade, bidirectional integrations are available free through the IBM Security App Exchange, which is good to see. QRadar SOAR now supports 180+ global privacy regulations for compliance tracking. The latest release, v51.0.9.0, introduced playbook instance dashboards with filtering by status and activation type, and a Data Navigator framework for low-code function configuration.
Users say the platform works well as a central hub for incident management, with automation reducing repetitive workload for analysts. Multi-team collaboration features and the intuitive dashboard get positive marks. With that said, playbook and workflow customization draws consistent criticism. Customers flag sub-playbook functionality as limited, and documentation gaps and support quality issues come up repeatedly. Some users also report compatibility problems with specific external tool integrations.
We think QRadar SOAR is a strong choice for IBM-native environments that prioritize guided, consistent response over highly custom workflows. WatsonX GenAI integration is on the 2026 roadmap, which should add AI-driven capabilities to the platform. If you need advanced customization or operate outside the IBM security ecosystem, those limitations will add friction.
Cortex XSOAR is an enterprise SOAR platform built around a marketplace of over 1,000 content packs and 270+ out-of-the-box playbooks. The war room feature sets it apart: a collaborative investigation space with built-in ChatOps and a command-line interface where analysts work incidents together in real time. We think it’s one of the stronger enterprise SOAR options for teams ready to invest in configuration.
The marketplace gives enterprise SOCs broad coverage without building custom connections for every tool. We found the Threat Intelligence Management module a strong differentiator; it aggregates threat intelligence feeds, customizes and scores them, and matches indicators against your specific environment. Automated workflows handle alert triage and prioritization, reducing manual overhead at scale. The war room keeps collaborative investigation structured and documented throughout the incident lifecycle. Unit 42 threat intelligence integration helps analysts separate high-impact threats from background noise.
Users running large environments report strong performance at scale, with validated deployments at 65,000+ endpoints. Customization depth and playbook flexibility get positive marks for complex incident response workflows. With that said, reporting customization feels limited relative to the platform’s overall depth. Customers flag initial configuration as carrying a steep learning curve, and on-premises deployments require meaningful ongoing maintenance.
We think Cortex XSOAR suits enterprise SOC teams with the headcount and maturity to configure and maintain it properly. If your environment already runs Palo Alto tooling, the native integrations and Unit 42 threat intelligence create a strong picture across detection and response. Smaller teams or those without dedicated SOAR engineers will get less return from the platform’s depth.
Rapid7 InsightConnect is a SOAR platform built for large organizations looking to automate security operations across a wide toolset. It focuses on practical automation for common threat scenarios, including phishing and ransomware, while supporting proactive vulnerability management workflows. We think it works best for organizations with diverse toolsets that need to connect security, IT, and operations workflows in one automation layer.
InsightConnect connects with over 300 plugins, with 270+ available as open source on GitHub, and integrates with ITSM tools including ServiceNow and Jira, keeping security workflows linked to ticketing and change management processes. We found the human decision points inside automated workflows a practical design choice for teams that want speed without removing analyst oversight entirely. Pre-built automation targets high-frequency threats like phishing and ransomware directly. Proactive vulnerability management workflows extend SOAR beyond reactive incident response into earlier detection stages.
Something to be aware of is that available customer feedback covers the broader Rapid7 platform rather than InsightConnect specifically, so we’ve used it selectively. Where feedback does apply, users say initial setup is straightforward and the interface is easy to navigate. Customers flag configuration challenges during onboarding, particularly around network parameters and discovery scan setup, which can slow initial deployment.
We think InsightConnect is a strong option for large organizations that need to standardize workflows at scale. The ITSM integrations are particularly strong if your team runs incident response alongside ServiceNow or Jira change management. The open-source plugin model is a differentiator, letting teams contribute and customize integrations directly, which is good to see.
Splunk SOAR, formerly known as Splunk Phantom, is an enterprise platform combining playbook automation, infrastructure orchestration, case management, and threat intelligence. We think it’s a strong fit for enterprise SOC teams already running Splunk infrastructure or with the resources to invest in onboarding properly. The integration with Splunk Enterprise Security 8.0 brings SOAR capabilities directly into the analyst queue.
The platform integrates across 300+ third-party tools and supports 2,800+ automated actions, with a code-free visual editor for building custom playbooks. We found the visual playbook editor the standout capability; analysts can build and deploy complex workflows without scripting knowledge. Logic loops allow automatic retry of failed actions, reducing operational complexity. In Splunk SOAR 6.3, playbooks and actions are now fully integrated within the Splunk Enterprise Security 8.0 analyst queue, so analysts can run playbooks and see results without leaving the ES interface, which is a strong addition.
Users say the platform integrates smoothly with existing tools and becomes part of daily security workflow once teams move past initial setup. The visual playbook editor and machine-speed automation get praise as real productivity advantages during active incidents. With that said, cost and learning curve draw consistent criticism. Customers say the platform is expensive, particularly for smaller organizations, and documentation falls short of what a complex platform requires. Users also flag that the UI needs improvement in places.
We think Splunk SOAR suits enterprise SOC teams that handle high volumes of repetitive tasks where the playbook depth and integration coverage pay off over time. The native integration with Enterprise Security 8.0 is a meaningful differentiator for teams already in the Splunk ecosystem. For smaller organizations and teams sensitive to cost, the pricing is harder to justify.
Swimlane SOAR, powered by the Turbine platform and Hero AI, is a low-code hyperautomation platform built for enterprise SOCs, MSSPs, and regulated sectors including financial services and federal government. We think it’s one of the more mature low-code SOAR options for enterprise and regulated sector operations, with AI-driven workflow optimization that actively improves automation performance over time.
The Turbine Canvas builder reduces playbook creation time by up to three times compared to manual builds, letting analysts build remediation workflows without deep coding skills. Hero AI provides an agentic AI companion on every page of Turbine, with capabilities including native no-code generative AI in workflows, clear incident summarization, and recommended actions. In January 2026, Swimlane released an AI Agent workforce that can be dragged and dropped directly into playbooks, which is good to see. Dynamic case management covers over 72 customizable fields, and business intelligence dashboards track ROI directly, which is useful for security leaders who need to justify automation investment to stakeholders.
Users flag platform reliability as a standout, with cloud deployments reporting consistent uptime over extended periods. Setup speed gets positive marks, with basic automations running quickly after initial configuration. Customer service draws consistent praise across government, enterprise, and SMB segments. With that said, the platform’s customization depth carries a learning investment; customers note a high ceiling that takes time to reach.
We think Swimlane SOAR works best for enterprise SOCs and MSSPs scaling security operations without growing headcount proportionally. The AI-driven workflow optimization and ROI tracking suit security leaders accountable to business outcomes. Swimlane reports the platform executes 25 million actions daily, which speaks to the enterprise scale it supports.
Torq is an AI-powered SOC platform built around autonomous threat detection, investigation, and response. The platform has evolved significantly from a traditional SOAR tool into what Torq now positions as an autonomous SOC solution, powered by Socrates, an AI omni-agent that manages the full incident lifecycle. We think it’s a strong fit for organizations that want to reduce analyst workload through autonomous threat response at enterprise scale.
Torq’s HyperSOC platform combines hyperautomation executing orchestration workflows at 10x the speed of legacy SOAR with 300+ native integrations and 4,000+ actions. The Socrates AI agent handles Tier-1 alert triage autonomously, with Torq claiming it can resolve 95% of Tier-1 alerts and many Tier-2 tasks without human involvement. AI-generated workflows and no-code orchestration scale without engineering dependency. The platform provides visibility into complex attack scope and impact, with AI-generated case summaries and customizable access control. HyperSOC-2o is the latest release and the most agentic model to date.
Users say the platform integrates with multiple tools and displays workflows visually, cutting errors in complex automation builds. With that said, customers flag licensing complexity, and advanced features benefit from prior development knowledge. Something to be aware of is that SOAR-specific customer evidence is more limited compared to some established platforms in this space.
We think Torq is worth evaluating for teams prioritizing autonomous threat response at scale. The platform secured $140 million in Series D funding at a $1.2 billion valuation, and now protects hundreds of multinational enterprises. The agentic AI approach is distinct from traditional playbook-driven SOAR, and investigation time reductions of up to 90% on low-fidelity alerts are significant if they hold in your environment.
No-code next-gen SOAR alternative designed for automating security workflows at scale.
Built-in automation and response features integrated with Logpoint SIEM.
Scalable SOAR with codeless playbooks and deep integration support.
This article was written by Alex Zawalnyski, the Copy Manager at Expert Insights, who works alongside software experts to research, write, fact-check, and edit articles relating to B2B cyber security and technology solutions. This article has been technically reviewed by our technical researcher, Laura Iannini, who has experience with a range of cybersecurity platforms and conducts thorough product tests to ensure that Expert Insights’ reviews are definitive and insightful.
Research for this guide included:
This guide is updated at least every 3 months to review the vendors included and ensure that the features listed are up to date.
Who is this Shortlist for?
SOAR solutions are best suited to large enterprises or MSSPs that have a dedicated, experienced, in-house security team. As such, we’ve written this Shortlist for larger organizations looking to streamline already-established processes for event analysis and incident response.
How was the Shortlist picked?
When considering SOAR solutions, we evaluated providers based on the following criterion:
Features: Based on conversations with vendors, end customers, and our own testing, we selected the following key features:
Based on our experience in the SecOps and broader cybersecurity market, we have also considered several other factors, such as the benefit of consolidating multiple features into a single platform, the quality of the admin interface, the customer support on offer, and other use cases.
This list is designed to be a selection of the best SOAR providers. Many leading solutions have not been included in this list, with no criticism intended.
Selecting the right Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response (SOAR) solution involves aligning the platform with your organization’s security operations, tool ecosystem, and resource constraints. Consider these key steps to make an informed choice:
Assess Your Security Environment: Evaluate your existing tools (e.g., SIEM, EDR, firewalls), alert volume, and incident response needs to ensure the SOAR integrates seamlessly and addresses key pain points like alert fatigue or manual workflows.
Define Operational and Compliance Goals: Identify priorities such as reducing mean time to respond (MTTR), automating repetitive tasks, or meeting compliance standards (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) to guide feature requirements and playbook customization.
Prioritize Scalability and Flexibility: Choose a solution that scales with your network growth, supports multi-vendor integrations, and adapts to evolving threats or hybrid environments without requiring extensive reconfiguration.
Focus on critical features to ensure efficient incident management and automation:
Broad Integration Ecosystem: Look for platforms with extensive pre-built integrations (e.g., Splunk SOAR’s 350+ tools, FortiSOAR’s 3,000+ actions) to connect SIEMs, EDRs, and threat intelligence feeds for unified workflows.
Customizable Playbooks and Automation: Prioritize solutions with no-code or low-code playbook editors (e.g., ServiceNow SIR’s Azure Logic Apps, Swimlane’s low-code automation) to automate tasks like alert triage or malware containment.
AI-Driven Threat Intelligence: Ensure AI and machine learning for alert enrichment, anomaly detection, and playbook optimization (e.g., Cortex XSOAR’s ML-based suggestions, Splunk SOAR’s MITRE ATT&CK mapping) to enhance response accuracy.
Collaboration and Case Management: Verify real-time collaboration tools, war rooms, and centralized dashboards (e.g., IBM QRadar SOAR’s case management, Devo SOAR’s intuitive workflows) to streamline SOC teamwork and reporting.
Balance functionality with usability to maximize adoption and efficiency:
User-Friendly Interface: Avoid complex platforms that overwhelm analysts, opting for intuitive interfaces and visual editors (e.g., Rapid7 InsightConnect’s plugin-based UI) to simplify playbook creation and incident tracking.
Vendor Support Quality: Select providers with 24/7 support, detailed documentation, and resources like training or communities (e.g., Splunk SOAR’s guided tours) to assist with onboarding and optimization.
Testing and Trials: Use demos, free trials (e.g., offered by Splunk SOAR or FortiSOAR), or independent user reviews to validate integration ease, automation effectiveness, and performance before committing.
Our guide to the leading Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response solutions provides a comprehensive overview of platforms designed to streamline security operations, automate repetitive tasks, and accelerate incident response. The article evaluates tools based on features like broad integrations, customizable playbooks, AI-driven threat intelligence, and robust case management, catering to organizations of all sizes. It emphasizes balancing automation, scalability, and collaboration to reduce alert fatigue, enhance SOC efficiency, and strengthen security posture in cloud, on-premises, or hybrid environments facing sophisticated cyber threats.
Key Takeaways:
Unified Security Operations: Top SOAR solutions integrate disparate tools, providing centralized visibility and automated workflows to reduce manual effort and response times.
Intelligent Automation: Choose platforms with AI-driven playbooks and low-code editors to prioritize high-risk alerts and streamline tasks like phishing response or endpoint quarantine.
Scalable and Collaborative: Prioritize solutions with flexible deployments and real-time collaboration features to support growing SOCs and ensure compliance with standards like GDPR or HIPAA.
We’ve explored the leading SOAR solutions, highlighting how these tools empower organizations to automate security workflows, enhance collaboration, and respond to threats faster. Now, we’d love to hear your perspective—what’s your experience with SOAR platforms? Are features like no-code automation, AI-driven threat intelligence, or seamless integrations critical for your organization’s SOC strategy?
Selecting the right SOAR solution can transform how you manage cyber incidents, but challenges like integration complexity or playbook customization can arise. Have you found a standout platform that’s optimized your security operations, or encountered hurdles with scalability or usability? Share your insights to help other organizations navigate the SOAR landscape and choose the best tool for their needs.
Let us know which solution you recommend to help us improve our list!
SOAR solutions collect and analyze information from all the tools in your cybersecurity stack. By centralizing this data, they make it easier to identify threats and understand their potential impact, so your SOC team can remediate them more efficiently.
SOAR tools typically follow three stages:
SIEM stands for Security Information and Event Management. These tools collect and log cybersecurity event data from across your network, including your servers, applications, and databases. If it detects anything suspicious or anomalous, the SIEM solution sends an alert to the SOC team.
SOAR solutions work in a similar way – they start by monitoring and detecting networks events. However, rather than just sending a notification, SOAR tools can automatically respond to and remediate the issue.
Some issues are too complex for SOAR solutions to automatically remediate. In these instances, the tool will triage the threat, then notify the SOC team and guide them through the remediation process.
SOAR solutions require ongoing effort, engagement, and support—as well as analysts that can handle setting up playbooks, automating workflows, and following best practices.
Because of this, SOAR solutions tend to be best suited to large organizations or Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) with an experienced security team, and which want to streamline their already-established incident analysis and response processes.
Implementing SOAR provides organizations with several key advantages:
A comprehensive SOAR platform typically includes the following essential components:
Alex is an experienced journalist and content editor. He researches, writes, factchecks and edits articles relating to B2B cyber security and technology solutions, working alongside software experts.
Alex was awarded a First Class MA (Hons) in English and Scottish Literature by the University of Edinburgh.
Laura Iannini is a Cybersecurity Analyst at Expert Insights. With deep cybersecurity knowledge and strong research skills, she leads Expert Insights’ product testing team, conducting thorough tests of product features and in-depth industry analysis to ensure that Expert Insights’ product reviews are definitive and insightful.
Laura also carries out wider analysis of vendor landscapes and industry trends to inform Expert Insights’ enterprise cybersecurity buyers’ guides, covering topics such as security awareness training, cloud backup and recovery, email security, and network monitoring. Prior to working at Expert Insights, Laura worked as a Senior Information Security Engineer at Constant Edge, where she tested cybersecurity solutions, carried out product demos, and provided high-quality ongoing technical support.
Laura holds a Bachelor’s degree in Cybersecurity from the University of West Florida.