Best 7 IAST Tools For Development Teams (2026)
We reviewed the leading IAST tools on instrumentation depth, the accuracy of vulnerability identification during active execution, and how well each integrates into existing testing pipelines without adding significant latency.
Written by
Caitlin Harris
Technical Review by
Laura Iannini
Quick Summary
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) tools instrument running applications during test execution to identify vulnerabilities from inside the application — combining the coverage of dynamic testing with the code-level precision of static analysis. IAST finds vulnerability classes that neither SAST nor DAST can reliably identify on their own. We reviewed the top tools and found Invicti, Acunetix, and BlackDuck Seeker to be the strongest on instrumentation depth and vulnerability identification accuracy.
Interactive application security testing sits in a unique position. It observes your code while it runs, catching vulnerabilities in ways static analysis alone cannot. The challenge is wading through the noise. IAST tools generate findings during runtime, but false positives consume development resources faster than bad code does.
You need IAST that confirms exploitability before alerting developers. You need remediation guidance detailed enough that developers actually fix issues instead of dismissing them as noise. You need a tool that plays well with your CI/CD pipeline without requiring extensive orchestration overhead. Get it wrong, and developers bypass security checks rather than wait for scanning to finish.
We evaluated seven IAST solutions across legacy and modern web applications, microservices architectures, and API-heavy environments. We evaluated proof-based scanning, runtime visibility, code-level accuracy, compliance reporting, and integration maturity. We reviewed customer experiences to see where vendor claims diverge from operational reality. The gap between marketing materials and what actually reduces remediation time is substantial.
This guide gives you the technical insights and decision framework to match the right IAST solution to your development maturity, application architecture, and security team size.
Our Recommendations
Based on our evaluation, here’s where each solution stands:
- Best For development and security teams who need accurate vulnerability detection without drowning in false positives: Invicti , Proof-Based Scanning confirms real vulnerabilities before alerting, reducing false positive noise Pinpoints issues to exact file and line numbers for faster developer remediation Single page applications require additional tuning compared to legacy web apps.
- Best For development and security teams working with Node: Acunetix , AcuSensor pinpoints vulnerabilities to exact source code lines for faster remediation API testing supports REST, SOAP, and GraphQL through definition file imports Deep scans on large applications consume significant system resources and time.
- Best For enterprises running microservices architectures who need vulnerability detection mapped directly to standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, and GDPR: BlackDuck Seeker , Sensitive data tracking verifies encryption and handling for PCI DSS and GDPR compliance Active verification confirms exploitability before alerting, reducing false positive volume Enterprise focus and compliance features may exceed needs for smaller teams.
- Best For DevOps and security teams who want vulnerability detection integrated directly into CI/CD pipelines without separate security scan cycles: Checkmarx One , uses existing functional tests for security analysis, eliminating separate scan cycles Query customization handles application-specific patterns and reduces false positives Some UX limitations and portal issues noted by customers.
- Best For development and DevOps teams who want security findings with enough context for developers to actually fix issues without security expertise: Contrast Security Assess , Live architecture visualization connects vulnerabilities to actual code execution paths Security Trace format explains fixes in terms developers understand without security expertise Language support for legacy applications and older framework versions is limited.
Invicti combines DAST and IAST scanning into a single platform for web application security testing. It targets development and security teams who need accurate vulnerability detection without drowning in false positives.
Proof-Based Scanning That Cuts Through Noise
The standout feature here is Proof-Based Scanning. Instead of flagging potential issues, Invicti confirms exploitable vulnerabilities before reporting them. We found this drastically reduces the time developers spend chasing false positives.
The IAST sensor runs inside your application’s runtime environment. It maps every page, including hidden and unlinked files that DAST alone would miss. When it finds something, you get exact file names and line numbers for quick fixes. Configuration file access helps catch misconfigurations and suggests best practice improvements.
What Customers Are Saying
Customers highlight easy deployment and integration with existing tools like SSO and DevOps pipelines. Support gets consistent praise for quick, helpful responses. Daily users call it reliable and efficient for ongoing security assessments.
Some customers flag challenges with single page applications.
Finding Your Fit With Invicti
If your environment includes a mix of legacy and modern web applications, Invicti handles the range well. We think it works best for teams that need developer-friendly output and compliance support for standards like PCI DSS.
Strengths
- Proof-Based Scanning confirms real vulnerabilities before alerting, reducing false positive noise
- Pinpoints issues to exact file and line numbers for faster developer remediation
- Easy integration with SSO and DevOps pipelines speeds up deployment
- Responsive support team gets consistent praise from daily users
Cautions
- Some users mention that single page applications require additional tuning compared to legacy web apps
- Some customer reviews flag that runtime IAST deployment requires application access, adding setup steps
Acunetix is a DAST vulnerability scanner that upgrades to IAST capabilities when you add the AcuSensor component. It targets development and security teams working with Node.js, PHP, Java, or ASP.NET applications who need code-level vulnerability insights.
AcuSensor Brings Code-Level Precision
The core value here is the DAST-to-IAST upgrade path. Add AcuSensor and the scanner connects directly to your code interpreter or compiler. We found this gives you exact line numbers in source code, not just vulnerability descriptions.
API testing covers REST, SOAP, and GraphQL architectures through imported definition files.
What Customers Are Saying
Users praise the clean dashboard and remediation guidance that helps teams actually fix issues. CI/CD integration with tools like Jira makes security testing fit naturally into development workflows. Support response times get consistent positive mentions.
Customers flag resource intensity as the main friction point.
Right Fit for Framework-Specific Shops
If you run web applications on supported frameworks and want developer-friendly output, Acunetix delivers. We think it works best for teams with some security maturity who can tune scans and handle the findings volume.
Strengths
- AcuSensor pinpoints vulnerabilities to exact source code lines for faster remediation
- API testing supports REST, SOAP, and GraphQL through definition file imports
- CI/CD and Jira integration fits security testing into existing development workflows
- Clean dashboard with actionable remediation guidance helps teams fix issues
Cautions
- Based on customer reviews, deep scans on large applications consume significant system resources and time
- According to customer feedback, false positive filtering requires manual effort and security experience
BlackDuck Seeker
BlackDuck Seeker is an IAST solution built for teams juggling security and compliance simultaneously. It targets enterprises running microservices architectures who need vulnerability detection mapped directly to standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, and GDPR.
Sensitive Data Tracking Sets it Apart
The standout capability here is sensitive data tracking. Seeker follows data through your application to verify secure handling and proper encryption across storage locations. We found this particularly valuable for teams facing PCI DSS or GDPR audits.
Active verification uses patented methods to confirm vulnerabilities before reporting them. This cuts false positives significantly. Microservices data flow analysis shows how information moves between services, catching issues that single-application scanners miss.
What Customers Are Saying
Support gets consistent praise across customer feedback. Users highlight the responsive team and willingness to partner on product improvements. The interface earns marks for intuitive navigation and clear content presentation.
Customers appreciate the SDLC integrations that make security testing accessible for developers. Stack traces and code line identification speed up remediation. The tool handles large enterprise environments with minimal configuration overhead.
Compliance-First Teams Take Note
If regulatory compliance drives your security program, Seeker aligns well with that workflow. We think it fits best for enterprises with microservices architectures and active compliance obligations.
Strengths
- Sensitive data tracking verifies encryption and handling for PCI DSS and GDPR compliance
- Active verification confirms exploitability before alerting, reducing false positive volume
- Microservices data flow analysis catches vulnerabilities across service boundaries
- Responsive support team partners with customers on product development
Cautions
- According to some user reviews, enterprise focus and compliance features may exceed needs for smaller teams
- Based on customer feedback, IAST deployment requires runtime application access, adding integration steps
Checkmarx One
Checkmarx One brings SAST, SCA, and IAST capabilities into a unified platform for continuous application security testing. It targets DevOps and security teams who want vulnerability detection integrated directly into CI/CD pipelines without separate security scan cycles.
Zero-Scan-Time Testing Changes the Workflow
The key differentiator is using existing functional tests for security analysis. Instead of running separate security scans, Checkmarx One analyzes applications during your normal QA phase. We found this eliminates the security tax that slows down release cycles.
API security coverage addresses OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities with discovery, classification, and authorization monitoring. The SCA integration surfaces third-party library risks alongside your custom code findings. Deployment flexibility includes on-premises data centers or AWS private tenants.
What Customers Are Saying
Customers consistently highlight the onboarding experience. Implementation teams partner closely during rollout, and ongoing support stays responsive. Query customization gets specific praise for handling application-specific patterns and custom sanitizers to reduce false positives.
Some users flag UX limitations and occasional portal issues.
Enterprise Teams With Mature Pipelines Benefit Most
If you already run automated testing in CI/CD, Checkmarx One slots in without adding workflow overhead. We think it works best for organizations scaling security across multiple teams and projects.
Strengths
- uses existing functional tests for security analysis, eliminating separate scan cycles
- Query customization handles application-specific patterns and reduces false positives
- Unified platform combines SAST, SCA, and IAST without multiple tool integrations
- Pull request decoration gives developers immediate security feedback on code changes
Cautions
- Based on customer feedback, some UX limitations and portal issues noted by customers
- Based on customer reviews, API changes between versions require workflow adjustments
Contrast Security Assess
Contrast Security Assess is an IAST solution that analyzes applications during runtime to catch vulnerabilities as code executes. It targets development and DevOps teams who want security findings with enough context for developers to actually fix issues without security expertise.
Live Architecture Views Show What’s Happening
The standout feature is live architecture visualization. You see application code trees, data flow, and how vulnerabilities connect to actual execution paths. We found this makes threat modeling practical rather than theoretical.
Security Trace format explains each vulnerability: what it is, why it matters, and how to fix it. This bridges the gap between security findings and developer action. The agent runs lightweight without consuming significant system resources.
What Users Are Saying
Support gets exceptional marks. Customers describe a customer-first approach from sales through implementation. The team responds quickly to feedback and releases improvements often. Documentation and knowledge resources help teams get unstuck independently.
Users flag language support as a limitation, particularly for legacy applications running older framework versions. The default library scoring can feel harsh, marking components as failing when just one version behind. Some customers note the UI navigation takes getting used to, and SCA capabilities lag behind the core IAST strength.
Development Teams Who Want Context, Not Just Alerts
If your developers lack security training but need to own remediation, Contrast Assess gives them the context to act. We think it fits teams prioritizing developer experience alongside security coverage.
Strengths
- Live architecture visualization connects vulnerabilities to actual code execution paths
- Security Trace format explains fixes in terms developers understand without security expertise
- Lightweight agent integrates without consuming significant system resources
- Responsive support team with strong documentation and customer-first approach
Cautions
- Based on customer feedback, language support for legacy applications and older framework versions is limited
- Some users have noted that default library scoring can feel punitive for minor version differences
OpenText Core Application Security
OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based service combining SAST, DAST, SCA, and mobile testing through a single web portal. It targets larger enterprises that want consolidated application security with scheduling and dashboards, plus dedicated support resources.
Multi-Layered Scanning With Training Built In
The platform covers multiple assessment types. Static analysis handles source code, binaries, and bytecode. Dynamic testing uses automated and manual techniques for complex web applications and APIs. SCA monitoring uses natural language processing to track GitHub commits and advisory feeds for third-party risks.
We found the training resources notable. Over 100 hours of role-based secure development content helps teams build security skills alongside scanning capabilities. Site-to-site VPN support enables testing internal applications without exposing them publicly.
What Customers Are Saying
Long-term customers call the scan results trustworthy. Teams use it across large application portfolios, with one organization covering 98% of their application suite. The support team gets praise for responsiveness and security expertise. Dedicated customer success managers help larger clients optimize their programs.
Some users flag false positive rates as a concern requiring triage effort.
Enterprise Teams Wanting Consolidated Security Services
If you need SAST, DAST, SCA, and mobile testing without managing multiple vendor relationships, OpenText consolidates that stack. We think it fits best for larger organizations with dedicated security staff to manage findings.
Strengths
- Consolidated SAST, DAST, SCA, and mobile testing through a single cloud platform
- Over 100 hours of role-based developer training builds security skills alongside scanning
- 24/7 support with dedicated customer success managers for larger clients
- Site-to-site VPN enables secure testing of internal web applications
Cautions
- According to customer feedback, false positive rates require triage effort and tuning investment
- According to some user reviews, scan times vary with application complexity and assessment type
HCL AppScan
HCL AppScan provides DAST and IAST capabilities for web, mobile, API, and cloud applications with IDE and CI/CD integration. It targets security and development teams who need vulnerability detection woven into existing development workflows with compliance reporting built in.
Real-Time Detection Across Multiple Application Types
The platform handles diverse application environments from a single toolset. Web applications, APIs, and mobile apps all get coverage without switching between specialized scanners. We found the IDE and pipeline integrations make security testing a natural part of the development cycle rather than a gate at the end.
Dynamic analysis simulates attacks to show how applications behave under threat conditions. Automated policy enforcement checks against OWASP Top 10 and PCI DSS standards. Scan reports include specific remediation guidance so developers know what to fix, not just what broke.
What Customers Are Saying
Daily users praise the scanning engine and proxy integration features. Banking and enterprise customers highlight the DevOps pipeline integration as user-friendly. One long-term user notes steady improvement over nearly two years of use, calling it a reliable choice for DAST work.
Some customers flag usability challenges and configuration complexity.
Teams Needing Multi-Platform Coverage
If your environment spans web, mobile, and API applications, AppScan consolidates that testing. We think it fits best for organizations with dedicated security staff who can invest in proper configuration.
Strengths
- Single platform covers web, mobile, API, and cloud application security testing
- IDE and CI/CD integration embeds security testing directly into development workflows
- Compliance checks against OWASP Top 10 and PCI DSS with automated policy enforcement
- Detailed remediation guidance helps developers fix issues, not just find them
Cautions
- Some users have reported that configuration tuning requires expertise in authentication, exclusions, and scan policies
- Based on customer reviews, usability challenges noted by customers, especially during initial setup
Other Application Security Services
Monitors running applications to detect vulnerabilities in real time.
Developer-first SAST platform with real-time feedback and open-source scanning.
Mobile-focused IAST for secure DevOps and compliance.
Pipeline-first platform integrating code security across the SDLC.
What To Look For: IAST Solutions Checklist
When evaluating IAST solutions, we’ve identified seven key criteria. Here’s the checklist of questions you should be asking:
- Proof-Based or Active Verification: Does the tool confirm vulnerabilities are actually exploitable before alerting? Can it distinguish between real issues and theoretical risks? Can admins tune what constitutes proof?
- Code-Level Accuracy: Does the tool identify exact file names and line numbers? Can developers understand the vulnerability without security expertise? Does remediation guidance explain not just what is broken, but why and how to fix it?
- Application Architecture Support: Does it handle your application stack? Does it support single page applications? Can it analyze microservices data flows? How well does it handle modern frameworks versus legacy applications?
- CI/CD and IDE Integration: Can developers see results directly in their development environment? Does it fit your existing pipeline without requiring custom scripts? Can you enforce policies at the pull request level?
- Compliance Reporting: Does it map findings to compliance standards like PCI DSS or GDPR? Can you generate audit-ready reports without extra work? Does it track sensitive data handling?
- Performance Impact and Overhead: How much overhead does the IAST agent add to application runtime? Does scanning slow down your release cycle? Can you run continuous monitoring without impacting production performance?
- Scalability Across Environments: Does it handle large enterprise application portfolios? Can you manage multiple applications from one console? Does it work in cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments?
Weight these criteria based on your environment. Organizations needing proof-based findings should prioritize accuracy and false positive elimination. Teams with compliance obligations should focus on reporting and data tracking capabilities. DevOps-heavy you should emphasize CI/CD integration and automated policy enforcement.
How We Compared The Best Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST) Tools
Expert Insights is an independent editorial team that researches, tests, and reviews cybersecurity and IT solutions. No vendor can pay to influence our review of their products. Our Editor’s Scores are based solely on product quality. Before testing, we map the full vendor market for each category, identifying all active vendors from market leaders to emerging challengers.
We evaluated seven IAST platforms across legacy web applications, modern single page applications, microservices architectures, and API-heavy environments. We assessed proof-based scanning accuracy, runtime visibility, code-level remediation guidance, CI/CD integration depth, and compliance mapping capabilities. Each product was tested in controlled environments simulating enterprise deployment scenarios, where we evaluated setup complexity, policy configuration and developer experience, plus operational overhead.
Beyond hands on testing, we conducted market research across the IAST market and reviewed customer feedback and developer interviews where possible to validate vendor claims against operational reality. We spoke with product teams to understand architecture decisions, roadmap priorities, and known limitations. Our editorial and commercial teams operate independently. No vendor can pay to influence our review of their products.
This guide is updated quarterly. For full details on our evaluation process, visit our How We Test & Review Products.
The Bottom Line
IAST success depends on matching the tool to your application architecture, team maturity, and how much configuration overhead you can absorb.
If eliminating false positives is your top priority, Invicti confirms exploitable vulnerabilities before alerting developers. The exact code line numbers speed remediation dramatically. Budget for enterprise pricing before committing.
If developer experience matters more than advanced features, Contrast Security Assess delivers runtime visualization and threat context that developers actually understand. Expect language and framework compatibility to be a factor for legacy applications.
If compliance requirements drive your security program, BlackDuck Seeker tracks sensitive data handling and maps findings to regulatory standards.
If you want unified scanning without separate tools, Checkmarx One combines SAST, SCA, and IAST into one platform. using existing functional tests for security analysis eliminates the tax on release cycles. The unified approach simplifies toolchain management significantly.
If your environment spans web, mobile, and API applications, HCL AppScan consolidates multi-platform testing into one system. IDE and pipeline integration makes security testing fit naturally into development workflows.
For enterprises needing consolidated SAST, DAST, and SCA with training resources, OpenText Core Application Security provides 24/7 support and over 100 hours of developer training. The multi-layered approach works well for larger teams with mature processes.
Read the individual reviews above to dig into deployment specifics, pricing, and the trade-offs that matter for your development environment.
FAQs
Everything You Need To Know About Interactive Application Security Testing Tools (FAQs)
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST), also known as “grey-box testing”, is the process of testing an application or API for vulnerabilities in real time, while the app is being run by either a real user or an automated test runner that’s “interacting” with the app’s features and functionality. Most IAST solutions are designed to test web applications and APIs, rather than desktop or mobile applications.
Because IAST solutions analyze vulnerabilities in real-time, they can easily be integrated into a DevOps team’s CI/CD pipeline, without adding any extra time onto it. By carrying out IAST, DevOps teams can discover and fix any vulnerabilities before the app goes to market. This means that such vulnerabilities are much easier and less costly to fix. It also ensures that the application is secure before anyone actually deploys it—helping to prevent future users of the app from falling victim to potential data breaches.
Most traditional application security testing methods only test code from the outside, or they focus on static analysis—performing tests and scans on the app while it’s idle, rather than while it’s being run. However, testing an app from within and while it’s running—as IAST tools do—provides three main benefits:
- It enables DevOps teams to scan code that’s being used in production, helping to avoid false positives that may have already been addressed in another part of the code base
- Some IAST tools also come with integrated development environment (IDE) integrations, which enable DevOps teams to scan their code in development as well as in production; this enables them to “shift left” their security checks to an earlier stage in the development lifecycle, when issues are often easier and cheaper to fix
- IAST solutions are able to link vulnerability findings to the exact point in the source code where the vulnerability is, allowing for quick identification and remediation
However, IAST does also have some drawbacks. If an IAST solution doesn’t offer an IDE plugin, it can only test applications that have already been built. Additionally, IAST is programming language-dependent, so if your organization uses a less popular technology, it may not be compatible with an IAST tool.
Finally, IAST tools only scan code that’s actually executed during the test. This means that, if your tester forgets to test some functionality, the code behind that functionality may still have vulnerabilities in it when the code goes to market. To avoid this, we recommend deploying your IAST tool in a QA environment that runs automated, functional tests. This can help avoid human error and ensure that all of the app’s functionality is tested.
IAST tools scan the code of an application as it’s being executed. At their core, IAST tools are built upon sensor modules, which keep track of an application’s behavior while the tester is interacting with it. These sensors have access to the code itself, data flows and control flows, system configuration data, back-end connection data, and any web components. If the IAST tool detects a vulnerability within any of these areas—such as potential for an SQL injection, API keys being hardcoded in cleartext, or unencrypted connections—it alerts the DevOps team so they can quickly locate and remediate it.
There are type ways of implementing IAST sensors: you can either use invasive sensors, or non-invasive sensors. Most IAST tools use invasive sensors, which require the developer to make changes to the source code (a process known as “instrumentation”) in order for the sensors to work. This means that the organization has to maintain two separate versions of their source code—one with sensors and one without—which can lead to organizational complexity.
Non-invasive sensors, on the other hand, are not placed in the source code, so don’t require the source code to be modified for them to work. Instead, these sensors attach to the server-side runtime environment and analyze the code as it’s executed by the web server or application server.
There’s one more layer of complexity to IAST solutions—just as there are two types of IAST sensor, there are also two types of IAST itself: active and passive IAST. Active IAST is often called “DAST-induced IAST”, because it requires a Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) tool to work. The DAST tool activates the IAST sensors (which, with active IAST, are usually invasive sensors) to validate vulnerabilities that are found during the DAST tool’s attack simulations, which are run by an application security analyst. This type of IAST provides very accurate results, but it cannot be automated and requires its own testing environment. Active IAST tools also often don’t collate IAST and DAST data. For these reasons, active IAST isn’t suitable for large-scale or fast-paced DevOps environments.
Passive IAST, also known as “self-sufficient IAST”, was created to overcome the obstacles presented by active IAST. Instead of running dedicated tests or simulated attacks, it leverages all forms of functional testing to collect vulnerability data. This means that passive IAST can be manual or automatic—making it well-suited to fast-paced DevOps environments.
There are a few key features that you should look for in a strong IAST solution:
- A low false positive rate. Your IAST tool should only scan code that’s actually being used in production. This will help it to avoid false positives; some vulnerability scanning technologies scan code across different codebases, which opens up the opportunity for them to flag issues that have already been fixed elsewhere. By scanning code in production, your chosen IAST tool will only highlight genuine issues to you, helping save developer time and resources.
- Fast, automatic testing. Because IAST tools are usually used to test the security of applications that have already been built, it’s important that they’re able to scan large amount of code quickly. To enable this, you should look for a solution that provides automatic testing, with options to scan only new code or code that’s been edited since the last scan.
- Easy deployment. Your IAST solution should be ready to deploy out-of-the-box, with little to no need for custom configuration so that you can start scanning straight away. Deployment methods may include fully automated, manual, or Docker-based deployment.
- Real-time results. Your chosen IAST tool should provide feedback on any discovered vulnerabilities within seconds of finding them. This helps your developers to fix any issues quickly, so that your code is exposed to those vulnerabilities for as little time as possible.
- Vulnerability location pinpointing. IAST solutions have access to the application’s code, runtime control and data flow, memory and stack trace information, HTTP actions, and use of libraries and frameworks, they can pinpoint the exact source of any vulnerabilities they identify. The best IAST tools feed this information back to the developers so that they can locate and remediate the issue more quickly.
- CI/CD integration. Your IAST tool should integrate easily with your CI/CD tools, including standard build, test, QA, and bug tracking tools, without you having to spend lots of time configuring it or tuning it to reduce false positives. Depending on your specific use case, you may also wish to look for a solution that offers web APIs that enable you to integrate it into enterprise-specific tools, such as Jenkins builds.
- Compatibility with your application’s architecture. Your chosen solution should be able to support the architecture your application is built on, be it microservices-based, cloud-based, or standard architecture. If your application uses microservices, you should look for an IAST tool that allows API testing to ensure the security of those connections.
- Compatibility with multiple testing methods. Finally, your chosen IAST tool should be compatible with automated testing methods, manual QA/dev tests, unit testing, web crawlers, and any other testing methods you use.
IAST plays a crucial role in a comprehensive application security strategy by complementing other testing methods:
- SAST (Static Application Security Testing): IAST complements SAST by providing more accurate results and detecting vulnerabilities that SAST might miss due to its limited runtime visibility.
- DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing): IAST offers more detailed information about the location and cause of vulnerabilities than DAST, enabling faster and more efficient remediation.
- Software Composition Analysis (SCA): IAST can work alongside SCA to provide a more complete view of application security, including vulnerabilities in both custom code and third-party libraries.
- Penetration Testing: IAST can help penetration testers by providing insights into application behavior and potential vulnerabilities, making their testing more targeted and effective.
By combining IAST with these other methods, organizations can achieve a more robust and well-rounded application security posture, reducing the risk of security breaches and ensuring the development of secure software.
Written By
Caitlin Harris is the Deputy Head of Content at Expert Insights. As an experienced content writer and editor, Caitlin helps cybersecurity leaders to cut through the noise in the cybersecurity space with expert analysis and insightful recommendations.
Prior to Expert Insights, Caitlin worked at QA Ltd, where she produced award-winning technical training materials, and she has also produced journalistic content over the course of her career.
Caitlin has 8 years of experience in the cybersecurity and technology space, helping technical teams, CISOs, and security professionals find clarity on complex, mission critical topics like security awareness training, backup and recovery, and endpoint protection.
Caitlin also hosts the Expert Insights Podcast and co-writes the weekly newsletter, Decrypted.
Technical Review
Laura Iannini is a Cybersecurity Analyst at Expert Insights. With deep cybersecurity knowledge and strong research skills, she leads Expert Insights’ product testing team, conducting thorough tests of product features and in-depth industry analysis to ensure that Expert Insights’ product reviews are definitive and insightful.
Laura also carries out wider analysis of vendor landscapes and industry trends to inform Expert Insights’ enterprise cybersecurity buyers’ guides, covering topics such as security awareness training, cloud backup and recovery, email security, and network monitoring. Prior to working at Expert Insights, Laura worked as a Senior Information Security Engineer at Constant Edge, where she tested cybersecurity solutions, carried out product demos, and provided high-quality ongoing technical support.
Laura holds a Bachelor’s degree in Cybersecurity from the University of West Florida.